Seek Returns

Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) vs. Uber (UBER)

This page compares Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) with Uber (UBER) using historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation metrics.

Company Profile

Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) and Uber (UBER) both belong to the Ground Transportation industry, though CP is classified under Rail Transportation while UBER falls under Passenger Ground Transportation.

SymbolCPUBER
Company NameCanadian Pacific Kansas City LimitedUber Technologies, Inc.
Country/RegionCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS Industry GroupTransportationTransportation
GICS IndustryGround TransportationGround Transportation
GICS Sub-IndustryRail TransportationPassenger Ground Transportation
Market Capitalization76.46 billion USD150.82 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 30, 1983May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

CP
UBER
Loading price history…
Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) vs. Uber (UBER): Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCPUBER
5-Day Price Return0.91%-0.82%
13-Week Price Return2.78%5.05%
26-Week Price Return17.58%-20.84%
52-Week Price Return2.83%-19.87%
Month-to-Date Return-0.96%-0.70%
Year-to-Date Return15.78%-9.33%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.22M19.82M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.53M18.77M
3-Month Volatility23.74%35.14%
Beta0.911.16

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

Uber (UBER) at 33.32% ranks in the top quartile for Return on Equity (TTM), ahead of Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) at 8.85%, which sits closer to the industry mid-range.

CP

Transportation industry group

8.85%

Max
49.96%
Q3
24.84%
Median
14.64%
Q1
3.88%
Min
-6.75%

UBER

Transportation industry group

33.32%

Max
49.96%
Q3
24.84%
Median
14.64%
Q1
3.88%
Min
-6.75%
Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) vs. Uber (UBER): A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) at 27.21% ranks in the top quartile for Net Profit Margin (TTM), ahead of Uber (UBER) at 15.91%, which sits closer to the industry mid-range.

CP

Transportation industry group

27.21%

Max
43.82%
Q3
19.90%
Median
6.87%
Q1
1.71%
Min
-9.62%

UBER

Transportation industry group

15.91%

Max
43.82%
Q3
19.90%
Median
6.87%
Q1
1.71%
Min
-9.62%
Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) vs. Uber (UBER): A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) at 37.04% ranks in the top quartile for Operating Profit Margin (TTM), ahead of Uber (UBER) at 11.66%, which sits closer to the industry mid-range.

CP

Transportation industry group

37.04%

Max
47.61%
Q3
23.60%
Median
8.44%
Q1
3.22%
Min
-10.15%

UBER

Transportation industry group

11.66%

Max
47.61%
Q3
23.60%
Median
8.44%
Q1
3.22%
Min
-10.15%
Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) vs. Uber (UBER): A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCPUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)8.85%33.32%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.72%14.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)27.21%15.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)37.04%11.66%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)85.42%35.54%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Uber (UBER) at 1.07 keeps Current Ratio (MRQ) within its industry mid-range, while Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) at 0.67 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for CP.

CP

Transportation industry group

0.67

Max
2.08
Q3
1.57
Median
1.10
Q1
0.70
Min
0.36

UBER

Transportation industry group

1.07

Max
2.08
Q3
1.57
Median
1.10
Q1
0.70
Min
0.36
Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) vs. Uber (UBER): A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

Both Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) at 0.52 and Uber (UBER) at 0.42 post Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) near their industry mid-ranges, so neither company stands out strongly from peers on leverage.

CP

Transportation industry group

0.52

Max
2.69
Q3
1.41
Median
0.73
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

UBER

Transportation industry group

0.42

Max
2.69
Q3
1.41
Median
0.73
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00
Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) vs. Uber (UBER): A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

Uber (UBER) reports a problematic Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) of -0.24; operating income or EBIT does not fully cover interest expense, so the ratio points to interest-payment strain. Meanwhile Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) reports 11.36, ranking against industry peers normally.

CP

Transportation industry group

11.36

Max
21.71
Q3
11.36
Median
5.75
Q1
1.63
Min
-4.33

UBER

Transportation industry group

-0.24

Max
21.71
Q3
11.36
Median
5.75
Q1
1.63
Min
-4.33
Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) vs. Uber (UBER): A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCPUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.671.07
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.571.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.520.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.36-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) vs. Uber (UBER): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth at a Glance

SymbolCPUBER
Revenue Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)-2.48%14.48%
Revenue Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)1.10%18.31%
3-Year Revenue CAGR19.60%17.73%
5-Year Revenue CAGR14.36%36.10%

EPS Growth

Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) vs. Uber (UBER): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth at a Glance

SymbolCPUBER
EPS Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)-3.20%-84.82%
EPS Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)8.79%-29.82%
3-Year EPS CAGR6.20%--
5-Year EPS CAGR4.67%--

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Uber (UBER) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — often a deliberate choice to reinvest earnings rather than return cash. Meanwhile Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) reports a yield of 0.79%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CP

Transportation industry group

0.79%

Max
4.01%
Q3
1.77%
Median
0.81%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UBER

Transportation industry group

0.00%

Max
4.01%
Q3
1.77%
Median
0.81%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) vs. Uber (UBER): A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Uber (UBER) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) reports a payout of 20.19%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CP

Transportation industry group

20.19%

Max
112.14%
Q3
47.86%
Median
15.73%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UBER

Transportation industry group

0.00%

Max
112.14%
Q3
47.86%
Median
15.73%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) vs. Uber (UBER): A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCPUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.79%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)20.19%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

Both Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) at 25.48 and Uber (UBER) at 17.66 post Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) near the typical industry midpoint — neither company stands out strongly from peers on trailing earnings multiple.

CP

Transportation industry group

25.48

Max
68.67
Q3
39.12
Median
22.03
Q1
12.85
Min
1.75

UBER

Transportation industry group

17.66

Max
68.67
Q3
39.12
Median
22.03
Q1
12.85
Min
1.75
Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) vs. Uber (UBER): A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

Uber (UBER) at 2.81 hovers around the typical industry Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM), while Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) at 6.93 sits above its industry benchmark range — an elevated trailing revenue multiple for CP relative to peers.

CP

Transportation industry group

6.93

Max
5.87
Q3
2.82
Median
1.48
Q1
0.70
Min
0.14

UBER

Transportation industry group

2.81

Max
5.87
Q3
2.82
Median
1.48
Q1
0.70
Min
0.14
Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) vs. Uber (UBER): A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) at 2.11 carries typical industry Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ), while Uber (UBER) at 5.92 sits in the higher-multiple quartile — UBER carries a higher book-value multiple relative to peers.

CP

Transportation industry group

2.11

Max
9.25
Q3
4.77
Median
2.14
Q1
1.36
Min
0.45

UBER

Transportation industry group

5.92

Max
9.25
Q3
4.77
Median
2.14
Q1
1.36
Min
0.45
Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) vs. Uber (UBER): A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Transportation industry group benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCPUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)25.4817.66
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.932.81
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.115.92
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)50.8415.39