CP vs. UNP: Canadian Pacific Kansas City vs. Union Pacific Stock Comparison
How do Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) and Union Pacific (UNP) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) and Union Pacific (UNP) are both classified in the Rail Transportation sub-industry within the broader Ground Transportation industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Profile Item | CP | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited | Union Pacific Corporation |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Transportation | Transportation |
| GICS Industry | Ground Transportation | Ground Transportation |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Rail Transportation | Rail Transportation |
| Market Capitalization | 82.19 billion USD | 174.47 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | December 30, 1983 | January 2, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CP | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 27.38% | 35.59% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 5.90% | 10.98% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 6.03% | 7.61% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CP | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 22.60% | 22.14% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.12 | 0.95 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -25.88% | -31.83% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.82M | 2.97M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CP | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.04 | 1.43 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.62 | 2.29 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Union Pacific (UNP) at 39.70% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) at 8.15% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for UNP.
CP
Transportation industry group
8.15%
- Max
- 42.67%
- Q3
- 21.91%
- Median
- 11.31%
- CP
- 8.15%
- Q1
- 1.69%
- Min
- -15.07%
UNP
Transportation industry group
39.70%
- Max
- 42.67%
- UNP
- 39.70%
- Q3
- 21.91%
- Median
- 11.31%
- Q1
- 1.69%
- Min
- -15.07%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) at 25.03% and Union Pacific (UNP) at 28.85% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
CP
Transportation industry group
25.03%
- Max
- 50.36%
- CP
- 25.03%
- Q3
- 20.85%
- Median
- 5.56%
- Q1
- 0.93%
- Min
- -11.37%
UNP
Transportation industry group
28.85%
- Max
- 50.36%
- UNP
- 28.85%
- Q3
- 20.85%
- Median
- 5.56%
- Q1
- 0.93%
- Min
- -11.37%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) at 38.98% and Union Pacific (UNP) at 40.98% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.
CP
Transportation industry group
38.98%
- Max
- 53.49%
- CP
- 38.98%
- Q3
- 25.45%
- Median
- 10.71%
- Q1
- 3.19%
- Min
- -11.50%
UNP
Transportation industry group
40.98%
- Max
- 53.49%
- UNP
- 40.98%
- Q3
- 25.45%
- Median
- 10.71%
- Q1
- 3.19%
- Min
- -11.50%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CP | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 8.15% | 39.70% |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.44% | 9.27% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 25.03% | 28.85% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 38.98% | 40.98% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 53.40% | 56.29% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) at 3.66% and Union Pacific (UNP) at 1.07% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) at 13.32% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Union Pacific (UNP) at 8.03% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for CP.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CP | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 3.66% | 1.07% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 19.60% | -0.49% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 13.32% | 8.03% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 6.16% | 2.24% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Union Pacific (UNP) at 0.99 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) at 0.59 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for CP.
CP
Transportation industry group
0.59
- Max
- 2.50
- Q3
- 1.59
- Median
- 1.14
- Q1
- 0.79
- CP
- 0.59
- Min
- 0.28
UNP
Transportation industry group
0.99
- Max
- 2.50
- Q3
- 1.59
- Median
- 1.14
- UNP
- 0.99
- Q1
- 0.79
- Min
- 0.28
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) at 0.53 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Union Pacific (UNP) at 1.51 uses more debt funding than most peers.
CP
Transportation industry group
0.53
- Max
- 2.94
- Q3
- 1.45
- Median
- 0.82
- CP
- 0.53
- Q1
- 0.36
- Min
- 0.00
UNP
Transportation industry group
1.51
- Max
- 2.94
- UNP
- 1.51
- Q3
- 1.45
- Median
- 0.82
- Q1
- 0.36
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CP | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.59 | 0.99 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.53 | 1.51 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.00 | 2.26 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Union Pacific (UNP) at 1.85% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) at 1.01% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, UNP the richer one.
CP
Transportation industry group
1.01%
- Max
- 3.74%
- Q3
- 1.77%
- CP
- 1.01%
- Median
- 0.67%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
UNP
Transportation industry group
1.85%
- Max
- 3.74%
- UNP
- 1.85%
- Q3
- 1.77%
- Median
- 0.67%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) at 22.14% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Union Pacific (UNP) at 44.70% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
CP
Transportation industry group
22.14%
- Max
- 100.88%
- Q3
- 44.15%
- CP
- 22.14%
- Median
- 20.14%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
UNP
Transportation industry group
44.70%
- Max
- 100.88%
- UNP
- 44.70%
- Q3
- 44.15%
- Median
- 20.14%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CP | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.01% | 1.85% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 22.14% | 44.70% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) at 30.26 and Union Pacific (UNP) at 23.76 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CP
Transportation industry group
30.26
- Max
- 62.08
- Q3
- 34.61
- CP
- 30.26
- Median
- 20.36
- Q1
- 12.48
- Min
- 2.19
UNP
Transportation industry group
23.76
- Max
- 62.08
- Q3
- 34.61
- UNP
- 23.76
- Median
- 20.36
- Q1
- 12.48
- Min
- 2.19
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Investors are paying well above the peer range per dollar of sales for both Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) at 5.32 and Union Pacific (UNP) at 6.87 — each P/S ratio clears its industry’s benchmark range.
CP
Transportation industry group
5.32
- CP
- 5.32
- Max
- 4.54
- Q3
- 2.43
- Median
- 1.30
- Q1
- 0.65
- Min
- 0.07
UNP
Transportation industry group
6.87
- UNP
- 6.87
- Max
- 4.54
- Q3
- 2.43
- Median
- 1.30
- Q1
- 0.65
- Min
- 0.07
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CP) at 2.47 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Union Pacific (UNP) at 8.98 prices above its benchmark range — UNP looks rich relative to book.
CP
Transportation industry group
2.47
- Max
- 8.71
- Q3
- 4.24
- CP
- 2.47
- Median
- 2.00
- Q1
- 1.17
- Min
- -2.47
UNP
Transportation industry group
8.98
- UNP
- 8.98
- Max
- 8.71
- Q3
- 4.24
- Median
- 2.00
- Q1
- 1.17
- Min
- -2.47
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CP | UNP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 30.26 | 23.76 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 5.32 | 6.87 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.47 | 8.98 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.65% | 2.71% |