COP vs. YPF: ConocoPhillips vs. YPF Stock Comparison
How do ConocoPhillips (COP) and YPF (YPF) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
ConocoPhillips (COP) and YPF (YPF) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though COP is classified under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while YPF falls under Integrated Oil & Gas.
ConocoPhillips (COP) trades as ordinary local shares, while YPF (YPF) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | COP | YPF |
|---|---|---|
| Name | ConocoPhillips | YPF Sociedad Anónima Sponsored ADR |
| Country/Region | United States | Argentina |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Integrated Oil & Gas |
| Market Capitalization | 161.12 billion USD | 15.16 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | December 31, 1981 | June 29, 1993 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | COP | YPF |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 62.02% | 4.12% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 9.29% | 55.92% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 16.40% | 52.62% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
YPF (YPF) has an aggressive beta of 1.38, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while ConocoPhillips (COP) is defensive at 0.19 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | COP | YPF |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 31.63% | 39.02% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.19 | 1.38 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -36.30% | -48.79% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 6.60M | 1.23M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | COP | YPF |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.83 | -0.00 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.70 | -0.01 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 17.66% and YPF (YPF) at 17.41% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
COP
Energy industry group
17.66%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- COP
- 17.66%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
YPF
Energy industry group
17.41%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- YPF
- 17.41%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 16.76% and YPF (YPF) at 9.76% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
COP
Energy industry group
16.76%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- COP
- 16.76%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
YPF
Energy industry group
9.76%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- YPF
- 9.76%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 30.05% and YPF (YPF) at 29.16% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
COP
Energy industry group
30.05%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- COP
- 30.05%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
YPF
Energy industry group
29.16%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- YPF
- 29.16%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | COP | YPF |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 17.66% | 17.41% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.98% | 9.92% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 16.76% | 9.76% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 30.05% | 29.16% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 49.01% | 38.74% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 7.67% and YPF (YPF) at -4.39% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
ConocoPhillips (COP) at -18.69% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while YPF (YPF) at -135.23% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | COP | YPF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 7.67% | -4.39% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -9.11% | -0.28% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -18.69% | -135.23% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -24.18% | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 1.52 and YPF (YPF) at 1.24 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
COP
Energy industry group
1.52
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- COP
- 1.52
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
YPF
Energy industry group
1.24
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- YPF
- 1.24
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 0.35 and YPF (YPF) at 0.79 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
COP
Energy industry group
0.35
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- COP
- 0.35
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
YPF
Energy industry group
0.79
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- YPF
- 0.79
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | COP | YPF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.52 | 1.24 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.35 | 0.79 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.45 | 0.96 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
YPF (YPF) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile ConocoPhillips (COP) reports a yield of 2.48%, ranking against industry peers normally.
COP
Energy industry group
2.48%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- COP
- 2.48%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
YPF
Energy industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- YPF
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
YPF (YPF) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile ConocoPhillips (COP) reports a payout of 35.41%, ranking against industry peers normally.
COP
Energy industry group
35.41%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- COP
- 35.41%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
YPF
Energy industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- YPF
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | COP | YPF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.48% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 35.41% | 0.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
YPF (YPF) at 7.12 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 14.36 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for YPF, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
COP
Energy industry group
14.36
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- COP
- 14.36
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
YPF
Energy industry group
7.12
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- YPF
- 7.12
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
YPF (YPF) at 0.00 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.34 prices around its industry’s middle — YPF costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
COP
Energy industry group
2.34
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- COP
- 2.34
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
YPF
Energy industry group
0.00
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- YPF
- 0.00
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
YPF (YPF) at 1.12 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.44 carries an above-peer premium to book — COP is pricier on assets.
COP
Energy industry group
2.44
- Max
- 4.21
- COP
- 2.44
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
YPF
Energy industry group
1.12
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- YPF
- 1.12
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | COP | YPF |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 14.36 | 7.12 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.34 | 0.00 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.44 | 1.12 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 7.12% | 5,553.69% |