Seek Returns

COP vs. YPF: ConocoPhillips vs. YPF Stock Comparison

How do ConocoPhillips (COP) and YPF (YPF) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

ConocoPhillips (COP) and YPF (YPF) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though COP is classified under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while YPF falls under Integrated Oil & Gas.

ConocoPhillips (COP) trades as ordinary local shares, while YPF (YPF) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for ConocoPhillips (COP) and YPF (YPF)
Profile ItemCOPYPF
NameConocoPhillipsYPF S.A. Sponsored ADR
Country/RegionUnited StatesArgentina
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionIntegrated Oil & Gas
Market Capitalization141.29 billion USD19.28 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 31, 1981June 29, 1993
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

COP
YPF
GSPC
Loading price history…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. YPF (YPF), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for ConocoPhillips (COP) and YPF (YPF). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for ConocoPhillips (COP) and YPF (YPF). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and YPF (YPF)
MetricCOPYPF
Total Return (1Y)31.22%37.43%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)4.02%52.18%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)19.81%61.82%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

COP
YPF
GSPC
Loading price history…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. YPF (YPF), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for ConocoPhillips (COP) and YPF (YPF). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and YPF (YPF)
MetricCOPYPF
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)30.00%52.38%
Beta (5Y)0.111.23
Max Drawdown (5Y)-36.30%-48.79%
Avg. Volume (3M)7.12M1.70M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
COP and YPF are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and YPF (YPF)
MetricCOPYPF
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.910.64
Sortino Ratio (1Y)1.311.04

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

YPF (YPF) reports a negative ROE of -2.94%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile ConocoPhillips (COP) reports 14.18%, ranking against industry peers normally.

COP

Energy industry group

14.18%

Max
42.10%
Q3
19.40%
COP
14.18%
Median
10.25%
Q1
-0.11%
Min
-26.68%

YPF

Energy industry group

-2.94%

Max
42.10%
Q3
19.40%
Median
10.25%
Q1
-0.11%
YPF
-2.94%
Min
-26.68%
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. YPF (YPF): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

YPF (YPF) reports a negative net margin of -1.82%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile ConocoPhillips (COP) reports 14.50%, ranking against industry peers normally.

COP

Energy industry group

14.50%

Max
51.35%
Q3
21.52%
COP
14.50%
Median
7.66%
Q1
0.00%
Min
-24.25%

YPF

Energy industry group

-1.82%

Max
51.35%
Q3
21.52%
Median
7.66%
Q1
0.00%
YPF
-1.82%
Min
-24.25%
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. YPF (YPF): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 31.97% and YPF (YPF) at 18.99% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

COP

Energy industry group

31.97%

Max
78.18%
Q3
38.21%
COP
31.97%
Median
18.59%
Q1
8.37%
Min
-27.84%

YPF

Energy industry group

18.99%

Max
78.18%
Q3
38.21%
YPF
18.99%
Median
18.59%
Q1
8.37%
Min
-27.84%
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. YPF (YPF): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and YPF (YPF)
MetricCOPYPF
ROE (TTM)14.18%-2.94%
ROA (TTM)7.31%5.39%
Net Margin (TTM)14.50%-1.82%
Operating Margin (TTM)31.97%18.99%
Gross Margin (TTM)47.21%29.96%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 7.67% and YPF (YPF) at -4.39% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. YPF (YPF): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

ConocoPhillips (COP) at -18.69% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while YPF (YPF) at -135.23% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. YPF (YPF): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and YPF (YPF)
MetricCOPYPF
Revenue Growth (YoY)7.67%-4.39%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-9.11%-0.28%
EPS Growth (YoY)-18.69%-135.23%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-24.18%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 1.54 and YPF (YPF) at 0.94 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

COP

Energy industry group

1.54

Max
4.44
Q3
2.32
COP
1.54
Median
1.47
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

YPF

Energy industry group

0.94

Max
4.44
Q3
2.32
Median
1.47
YPF
0.94
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. YPF (YPF): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 0.36 and YPF (YPF) at 0.92 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

COP

Energy industry group

0.36

Max
2.02
Q3
1.00
Median
0.57
COP
0.36
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

YPF

Energy industry group

0.92

Max
2.02
Q3
1.00
YPF
0.92
Median
0.57
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. YPF (YPF): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and YPF (YPF)
MetricCOPYPF
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.540.94
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.360.92
Net Debt / EBITDA0.591.79

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

YPF (YPF) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile ConocoPhillips (COP) reports a yield of 2.72%, ranking against industry peers normally.

COP

Energy industry group

2.72%

Max
6.79%
Q3
2.74%
COP
2.72%
Median
1.18%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

YPF

Energy industry group

0.00%

Max
6.79%
Q3
2.74%
Median
1.18%
YPF
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. YPF (YPF): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

YPF (YPF) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile ConocoPhillips (COP) reports a payout of 43.65%, ranking against industry peers normally.

COP

Energy industry group

43.65%

Max
123.08%
Q3
54.79%
COP
43.65%
Median
27.03%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

YPF

Energy industry group

0.00%

Max
123.08%
Q3
54.79%
Median
27.03%
YPF
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. YPF (YPF): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and YPF (YPF)
MetricCOPYPF
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.72%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)43.65%0.00%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: ConocoPhillips (COP) trades at 15.45 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while YPF (YPF) has no P/E ratio this period.

COP

Energy industry group

15.45

Max
50.29
Q3
26.02
COP
15.45
Median
15.45
Q1
9.09
Min
2.22

YPF

Energy industry group

--

Max
50.29
Q3
26.02
Median
15.45
Q1
9.09
Min
2.22
YPF
--
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. YPF (YPF): YPF does not report P/E ratio, so it has no value marker; COP is benchmarked against the Energy industry group.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

YPF (YPF) at 0.00 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.21 prices around its industry’s middle — YPF costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

COP

Energy industry group

2.21

Max
5.08
Q3
2.76
COP
2.21
Median
1.75
Q1
0.96
Min
0.00

YPF

Energy industry group

0.00

Max
5.08
Q3
2.76
Median
1.75
Q1
0.96
YPF
0.00
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. YPF (YPF): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.22 and YPF (YPF) at 1.84 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

COP

Energy industry group

2.22

Max
4.78
Q3
2.75
COP
2.22
Median
1.69
Q1
1.20
Min
0.01

YPF

Energy industry group

1.84

Max
4.78
Q3
2.75
YPF
1.84
Median
1.69
Q1
1.20
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. YPF (YPF): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and YPF (YPF)
MetricCOPYPF
P/E Ratio (TTM)15.45--
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.210.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)2.221.84
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)5.25%-7,229.57%