COP vs. TTE: ConocoPhillips vs. TotalEnergies Stock Comparison

July 7, 2026

How do ConocoPhillips (COP) and TotalEnergies (TTE) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

ConocoPhillips (COP) and TotalEnergies (TTE) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though COP is classified under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while TTE falls under Integrated Oil & Gas.

Company profile comparison for ConocoPhillips (COP) and TotalEnergies (TTE)
Profile Item	COP	TTE
Name	ConocoPhillips	TotalEnergies SE
Country/Region	United States	France
GICS Sector	Energy	Energy
GICS Industry Group	Energy	Energy
GICS Industry	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-Industry	Oil & Gas Exploration & Production	Integrated Oil & Gas
Market Capitalization	126.19 billion USD	169.78 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	December 31, 1981	October 25, 1991
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

COP

TTE

GSPC

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. TotalEnergies (TTE), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for ConocoPhillips (COP) and TotalEnergies (TTE). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for ConocoPhillips (COP) and TotalEnergies (TTE). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and TotalEnergies (TTE)
Metric	COP	TTE
Total Return (1Y)	14.23%	26.90%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	4.18%	16.91%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	15.48%	17.54%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

COP

TTE

GSPC

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. TotalEnergies (TTE), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for ConocoPhillips (COP) and TotalEnergies (TTE). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and TotalEnergies (TTE)
Metric	COP	TTE
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	29.33%	23.51%
Beta (5Y)	0.13	0.13
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-36.30%	-26.16%
Avg. Volume (3M)	7.96M	1.62M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

COP and TTE are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and TotalEnergies (TTE)
Metric	COP	TTE
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	0.35	0.98
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	0.50	1.40

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 11.28% and TotalEnergies (TTE) at 12.51% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

COP

Energy industry group

11.28%

Max: 37.23%
Q3: 16.01%
COP: 11.28%
Median: 9.18%
Q1: -0.83%
Min: -20.70%

TTE

Energy industry group

12.51%

Max: 37.23%
Q3: 16.01%
TTE: 12.51%
Median: 9.18%
Q1: -0.83%
Min: -20.70%

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. TotalEnergies (TTE): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 12.33% and TotalEnergies (TTE) at 8.20% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

COP

Energy industry group

12.33%

Max: 46.37%
Q3: 18.86%
COP: 12.33%
Median: 6.13%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -27.23%

TTE

Energy industry group

8.20%

Max: 46.37%
Q3: 18.86%
TTE: 8.20%
Median: 6.13%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -27.23%

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. TotalEnergies (TTE): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 22.05% and TotalEnergies (TTE) at 20.35% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

COP

Energy industry group

22.05%

Max: 68.02%
Q3: 29.13%
COP: 22.05%
Median: 12.01%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -41.46%

TTE

Energy industry group

20.35%

Max: 68.02%
Q3: 29.13%
TTE: 20.35%
Median: 12.01%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -41.46%

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. TotalEnergies (TTE): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and TotalEnergies (TTE)
Metric	COP	TTE
ROE (TTM)	11.28%	12.51%
ROA (TTM)	5.87%	4.89%
Net Margin (TTM)	12.33%	8.20%
Operating Margin (TTM)	22.05%	20.35%
Gross Margin (TTM)	45.59%	38.45%

Growth

Revenue Growth

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. TotalEnergies (TTE): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth Metrics

Revenue growth metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and TotalEnergies (TTE)
Metric	COP	TTE
Revenue Growth (YoY)	7.67%	-6.78%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	-9.11%	-11.53%

EPS Growth

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. TotalEnergies (TTE): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth Metrics

EPS growth metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and TotalEnergies (TTE)
Metric	COP	TTE
EPS Growth (YoY)	-18.69%	-13.60%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	-24.18%	-9.70%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 1.29 and TotalEnergies (TTE) at 1.08 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

COP

Energy industry group

1.29

Max: 3.33
Q3: 2.13
Median: 1.31
COP: 1.29
Q1: 0.83
Min: 0.08

TTE

Energy industry group

1.08

Max: 3.33
Q3: 2.13
Median: 1.31
TTE: 1.08
Q1: 0.83
Min: 0.08

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. TotalEnergies (TTE): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 0.36 and TotalEnergies (TTE) at 0.51 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

COP

Energy industry group

0.36

Max: 2.02
Q3: 1.01
Median: 0.61
COP: 0.36
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

TTE

Energy industry group

0.51

Max: 2.02
Q3: 1.01
Median: 0.61
TTE: 0.51
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. TotalEnergies (TTE): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and TotalEnergies (TTE)
Metric	COP	TTE
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.29	1.08
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	0.36	0.51
Net Debt / EBITDA	0.73	0.94

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TotalEnergies (TTE) at 5.36% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 3.09% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, TTE the richer one.

COP

Energy industry group

3.09%

Max: 8.56%
Q3: 3.47%
COP: 3.09%
Median: 1.60%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TTE

Energy industry group

5.36%

Max: 8.56%
TTE: 5.36%
Q3: 3.47%
Median: 1.60%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. TotalEnergies (TTE): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 54.92% and TotalEnergies (TTE) at 58.84% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

COP

Energy industry group

54.92%

Max: 139.86%
Q3: 63.37%
COP: 54.92%
Median: 31.85%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TTE

Energy industry group

58.84%

Max: 139.86%
Q3: 63.37%
TTE: 58.84%
Median: 31.85%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. TotalEnergies (TTE): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and TotalEnergies (TTE)
Metric	COP	TTE
Dividend Yield (TTM)	3.09%	5.36%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	54.92%	58.84%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 17.56 and TotalEnergies (TTE) at 11.32 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

COP

Energy industry group

17.56

Max: 55.25
Q3: 30.38
COP: 17.56
Median: 17.01
Q1: 10.34
Min: 1.69

TTE

Energy industry group

11.32

Max: 55.25
Q3: 30.38
Median: 17.01
TTE: 11.32
Q1: 10.34
Min: 1.69

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. TotalEnergies (TTE): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

TotalEnergies (TTE) at 0.92 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.13 prices around its industry’s middle — TTE costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

COP

Energy industry group

2.13

Max: 5.83
Q3: 2.94
COP: 2.13
Median: 1.73
Q1: 0.93
Min: 0.00

TTE

Energy industry group

0.92

Max: 5.83
Q3: 2.94
Median: 1.73
Q1: 0.93
TTE: 0.92
Min: 0.00

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. TotalEnergies (TTE): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 1.96 and TotalEnergies (TTE) at 1.33 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

COP

Energy industry group

1.96

Max: 4.70
Q3: 2.61
COP: 1.96
Median: 1.61
Q1: 1.11
Min: 0.01

TTE

Energy industry group

1.33

Max: 4.70
Q3: 2.61
Median: 1.61
TTE: 1.33
Q1: 1.11
Min: 0.01

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. TotalEnergies (TTE): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and TotalEnergies (TTE)
Metric	COP	TTE
P/E Ratio (TTM)	17.56	11.32
P/S Ratio (TTM)	2.13	0.92
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	1.96	1.33
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	4.19%	5.92%