COP vs. TPL: ConocoPhillips vs. Texas Pacific Land Stock Comparison
How do ConocoPhillips (COP) and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
ConocoPhillips (COP) and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) are both classified in the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production sub-industry within the broader Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Profile Item | COP | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Name | ConocoPhillips | Texas Pacific Land Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Capitalization | 161.12 billion USD | 18.79 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | December 31, 1981 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | COP | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 62.02% | -14.10% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 9.29% | 16.13% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 16.40% | 13.42% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | COP | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 31.63% | 49.74% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.19 | 0.62 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -36.30% | -52.50% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 6.60M | 380.93K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | COP | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.83 | -0.37 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.70 | -0.50 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 37.07% sits in the top ROE quartile, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 17.66% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for TPL.
COP
Energy industry group
17.66%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- COP
- 17.66%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
TPL
Energy industry group
37.07%
- Max
- 53.85%
- TPL
- 37.07%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 60.71% converts revenue to bottom-line profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 16.76% keeps roughly the typical share for its industry.
COP
Energy industry group
16.76%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- COP
- 16.76%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
TPL
Energy industry group
60.71%
- TPL
- 60.71%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 76.20% turns sales into operating profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 30.05% operates around its industry’s norm.
COP
Energy industry group
30.05%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- COP
- 30.05%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
TPL
Energy industry group
76.20%
- TPL
- 76.20%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | COP | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 17.66% | 37.07% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.98% | 26.08% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 16.76% | 60.71% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 30.05% | 76.20% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 49.01% | 94.09% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 7.67% and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 13.09% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at -18.69% and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 6.04% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | COP | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 7.67% | 13.09% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -9.11% | 6.15% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -18.69% | 6.04% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -24.18% | 2.78% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
ConocoPhillips (COP) at 1.52 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 5.41 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.
COP
Energy industry group
1.52
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- COP
- 1.52
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
TPL
Energy industry group
5.41
- TPL
- 5.41
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 0.01 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 0.35 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
COP
Energy industry group
0.35
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- COP
- 0.35
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
TPL
Energy industry group
0.01
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- TPL
- 0.01
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | COP | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.52 | 5.41 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.35 | 0.01 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.45 | -0.44 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.48% and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 0.86% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
COP
Energy industry group
2.48%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- COP
- 2.48%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
TPL
Energy industry group
0.86%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- TPL
- 0.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 35.41% and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 27.42% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
COP
Energy industry group
35.41%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- COP
- 35.41%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
TPL
Energy industry group
27.42%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- TPL
- 27.42%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | COP | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.48% | 0.86% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 35.41% | 27.42% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
ConocoPhillips (COP) at 14.36 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 32.00 sits in the richer quartile — TPL needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
COP
Energy industry group
14.36
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- COP
- 14.36
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
TPL
Energy industry group
32.00
- Max
- 39.54
- TPL
- 32.00
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.34 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 19.41 clears its benchmark range — TPL looks notably rich on sales.
COP
Energy industry group
2.34
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- COP
- 2.34
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
TPL
Energy industry group
19.41
- TPL
- 19.41
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both look rich against book: ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.44 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 10.42 prices even higher, above its industry range.
COP
Energy industry group
2.44
- Max
- 4.21
- COP
- 2.44
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
TPL
Energy industry group
10.42
- TPL
- 10.42
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | COP | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 14.36 | 32.00 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.34 | 19.41 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.44 | 10.42 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 7.12% | 0.43% |