Seek Returns

COP vs. RRC: ConocoPhillips vs. Range Resources Stock Comparison

How do ConocoPhillips (COP) and Range Resources (RRC) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

ConocoPhillips (COP) and Range Resources (RRC) are both classified in the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production sub-industry within the broader Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Company profile comparison for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Range Resources (RRC)
Profile ItemCOPRRC
NameConocoPhillipsRange Resources Corporation
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Capitalization161.12 billion USD11.39 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 31, 1981June 19, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

COP
RRC
GSPC
Loading price history…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Range Resources (RRC), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Range Resources (RRC). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Range Resources (RRC). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Range Resources (RRC)
MetricCOPRRC
Total Return (1Y)62.02%32.08%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)9.29%15.20%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)16.40%16.16%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

COP
RRC
GSPC
Loading price history…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Range Resources (RRC), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Range Resources (RRC). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Range Resources (RRC)
MetricCOPRRC
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)31.63%36.83%
Beta (5Y)0.190.65
Max Drawdown (5Y)-36.30%-37.66%
Avg. Volume (3M)6.60M3.57M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
COP and RRC are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Range Resources (RRC)
MetricCOPRRC
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.830.75
Sortino Ratio (1Y)2.701.23

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 17.66% and Range Resources (RRC) at 19.64% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

COP

Energy industry group

17.66%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
COP
17.66%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

RRC

Energy industry group

19.64%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
RRC
19.64%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Range Resources (RRC): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Range Resources (RRC) at 26.22% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of ConocoPhillips (COP) at 16.76%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

COP

Energy industry group

16.76%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
COP
16.76%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

RRC

Energy industry group

26.22%

Max
56.92%
RRC
26.22%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Range Resources (RRC): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 30.05% and Range Resources (RRC) at 31.45% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

COP

Energy industry group

30.05%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
COP
30.05%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

RRC

Energy industry group

31.45%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
RRC
31.45%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Range Resources (RRC): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Range Resources (RRC)
MetricCOPRRC
ROE (TTM)17.66%19.64%
ROA (TTM)8.98%10.60%
Net Margin (TTM)16.76%26.22%
Operating Margin (TTM)30.05%31.45%
Gross Margin (TTM)49.01%52.34%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Range Resources (RRC) at 27.32% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 7.67% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for RRC.

Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Range Resources (RRC): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Range Resources (RRC) at 151.38% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than ConocoPhillips (COP) at -18.69%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Range Resources (RRC): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Range Resources (RRC)
MetricCOPRRC
Revenue Growth (YoY)7.67%27.32%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-9.11%-17.55%
EPS Growth (YoY)-18.69%151.38%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-24.18%-16.40%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ConocoPhillips (COP) at 1.52 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Range Resources (RRC) at 0.74 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for RRC.

COP

Energy industry group

1.52

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
COP
1.52
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

RRC

Energy industry group

0.74

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
RRC
0.74
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Range Resources (RRC): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Range Resources (RRC) at 0.19 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 0.35 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

COP

Energy industry group

0.35

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
COP
0.35
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

RRC

Energy industry group

0.19

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
RRC
0.19
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Range Resources (RRC): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Range Resources (RRC)
MetricCOPRRC
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.520.74
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.350.19
Net Debt / EBITDA0.450.55

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.48% and Range Resources (RRC) at 0.78% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

COP

Energy industry group

2.48%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
COP
2.48%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RRC

Energy industry group

0.78%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
Median
1.71%
RRC
0.78%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Range Resources (RRC): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 35.41% and Range Resources (RRC) at 10.34% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

COP

Energy industry group

35.41%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
COP
35.41%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RRC

Energy industry group

10.34%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
RRC
10.34%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Range Resources (RRC): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Range Resources (RRC)
MetricCOPRRC
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.48%0.78%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)35.41%10.34%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 14.36 and Range Resources (RRC) at 12.92 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

COP

Energy industry group

14.36

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
COP
14.36
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

RRC

Energy industry group

12.92

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
RRC
12.92
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Range Resources (RRC): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.34 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Range Resources (RRC) at 3.35 sits in the pricier quartile — RRC costs more per dollar of sales.

COP

Energy industry group

2.34

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
COP
2.34
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

RRC

Energy industry group

3.35

Max
5.40
RRC
3.35
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Range Resources (RRC): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Range Resources (RRC) at 2.34 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.44 carries an above-peer premium to book — COP is pricier on assets.

COP

Energy industry group

2.44

Max
4.21
COP
2.44
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

RRC

Energy industry group

2.34

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
RRC
2.34
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Range Resources (RRC): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Range Resources (RRC)
MetricCOPRRC
P/E Ratio (TTM)14.3612.92
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.343.35
P/B Ratio (MRQ)2.442.34
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)7.12%3.61%