Seek Returns

COP vs. PBA: ConocoPhillips vs. Pembina Pipeline Stock Comparison

How do ConocoPhillips (COP) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

ConocoPhillips (COP) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though COP is classified under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while PBA falls under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation.

Company profile comparison for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA)
Profile ItemCOPPBA
NameConocoPhillipsPembina Pipeline Corp.
Country/RegionUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Storage & Transportation
Market Capitalization161.12 billion USD28.08 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 31, 1981October 6, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

COP
PBA
GSPC
Loading price history…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Pembina Pipeline (PBA), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA)
MetricCOPPBA
Total Return (1Y)62.02%35.84%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)9.29%20.26%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)16.40%12.46%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

COP
PBA
GSPC
Loading price history…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Pembina Pipeline (PBA), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA)
MetricCOPPBA
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)31.63%20.43%
Beta (5Y)0.190.59
Max Drawdown (5Y)-36.30%-27.37%
Avg. Volume (3M)6.60M993.87K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
COP and PBA are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA)
MetricCOPPBA
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.831.54
Sortino Ratio (1Y)2.702.32

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 17.66% and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 12.10% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

COP

Energy industry group

17.66%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
COP
17.66%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

PBA

Energy industry group

12.10%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
PBA
12.10%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Pembina Pipeline (PBA): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 24.78% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of ConocoPhillips (COP) at 16.76%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

COP

Energy industry group

16.76%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
COP
16.76%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

PBA

Energy industry group

24.78%

Max
56.92%
PBA
24.78%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Pembina Pipeline (PBA): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 30.05% and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 32.63% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

COP

Energy industry group

30.05%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
COP
30.05%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

PBA

Energy industry group

32.63%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
PBA
32.63%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Pembina Pipeline (PBA): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA)
MetricCOPPBA
ROE (TTM)17.66%12.10%
ROA (TTM)8.98%4.65%
Net Margin (TTM)16.76%24.78%
Operating Margin (TTM)30.05%32.63%
Gross Margin (TTM)49.01%38.23%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 7.67% and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 5.34% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Pembina Pipeline (PBA): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at -18.69% and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at -11.33% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Pembina Pipeline (PBA): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA)
MetricCOPPBA
Revenue Growth (YoY)7.67%5.34%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-9.11%-12.50%
EPS Growth (YoY)-18.69%-11.33%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-24.18%-19.61%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ConocoPhillips (COP) at 1.52 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 0.75 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for PBA.

COP

Energy industry group

1.52

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
COP
1.52
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

PBA

Energy industry group

0.75

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
PBA
0.75
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Pembina Pipeline (PBA): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 0.35 and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 0.80 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

COP

Energy industry group

0.35

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
COP
0.35
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

PBA

Energy industry group

0.80

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
PBA
0.80
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Pembina Pipeline (PBA): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA)
MetricCOPPBA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.520.75
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.350.80
Net Debt / EBITDA0.453.74

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 6.13% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.48% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, PBA the richer one.

COP

Energy industry group

2.48%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
COP
2.48%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PBA

Energy industry group

6.13%

Max
8.57%
PBA
6.13%
Q3
3.58%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Pembina Pipeline (PBA): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

ConocoPhillips (COP) at 35.41% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 86.79% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

COP

Energy industry group

35.41%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
COP
35.41%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PBA

Energy industry group

86.79%

Max
133.24%
PBA
86.79%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Pembina Pipeline (PBA): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA)
MetricCOPPBA
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.48%6.13%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)35.41%86.79%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 14.36 and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 20.12 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

COP

Energy industry group

14.36

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
COP
14.36
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

PBA

Energy industry group

20.12

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
PBA
20.12
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Pembina Pipeline (PBA): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.34 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 3.36 sits in the pricier quartile — PBA costs more per dollar of sales.

COP

Energy industry group

2.34

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
COP
2.34
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

PBA

Energy industry group

3.36

Max
5.40
PBA
3.36
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Pembina Pipeline (PBA): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.44 and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 2.55 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.

COP

Energy industry group

2.44

Max
4.21
COP
2.44
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

PBA

Energy industry group

2.55

Max
4.21
PBA
2.55
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Pembina Pipeline (PBA): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA)
MetricCOPPBA
P/E Ratio (TTM)14.3620.12
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.343.36
P/B Ratio (MRQ)2.442.55
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)7.12%5.53%