COP vs. LNG: ConocoPhillips vs. Cheniere Energy Stock Comparison
How do ConocoPhillips (COP) and Cheniere Energy (LNG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
ConocoPhillips (COP) and Cheniere Energy (LNG) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though COP is classified under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while LNG falls under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation.
| Profile Item | COP | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Name | ConocoPhillips | Cheniere Energy Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation |
| Market Capitalization | 126.19 billion USD | 51.57 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | December 31, 1981 | April 4, 1994 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | COP | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 14.23% | 3.71% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 4.18% | 18.97% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 15.48% | 24.03% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Cheniere Energy (LNG) reports a negative beta of -0.00, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. ConocoPhillips (COP) has a non-negative beta of 0.13.
| Metric | COP | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 29.33% | 27.11% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.13 | -0.00 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -36.30% | -24.87% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 7.96M | 2.38M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | COP | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.35 | -0.01 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.50 | -0.01 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 28.92% sits in the top ROE quartile, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 11.28% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for LNG.
COP
Energy industry group
11.28%
- Max
- 37.23%
- Q3
- 16.01%
- COP
- 11.28%
- Median
- 9.18%
- Q1
- -0.83%
- Min
- -20.70%
LNG
Energy industry group
28.92%
- Max
- 37.23%
- LNG
- 28.92%
- Q3
- 16.01%
- Median
- 9.18%
- Q1
- -0.83%
- Min
- -20.70%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 12.33% and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 7.10% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
COP
Energy industry group
12.33%
- Max
- 46.37%
- Q3
- 18.86%
- COP
- 12.33%
- Median
- 6.13%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -27.23%
LNG
Energy industry group
7.10%
- Max
- 46.37%
- Q3
- 18.86%
- LNG
- 7.10%
- Median
- 6.13%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -27.23%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Cheniere Energy (LNG) reports a negative operating margin of -53.75%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile ConocoPhillips (COP) reports 22.05%, ranking against industry peers normally.
COP
Energy industry group
22.05%
- Max
- 68.02%
- Q3
- 29.13%
- COP
- 22.05%
- Median
- 12.01%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -41.46%
LNG
Energy industry group
-53.75%
- Max
- 68.02%
- Q3
- 29.13%
- Median
- 12.01%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -41.46%
- LNG
- -53.75%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | COP | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 11.28% | 28.92% |
| ROA (TTM) | 5.87% | 6.43% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 12.33% | 7.10% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 22.05% | -53.75% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 45.59% | 33.00% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Revenue Growth Metrics
| Metric | COP | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 7.67% | 27.21% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -9.11% | -15.77% |
EPS Growth
EPS Growth Metrics
| Metric | COP | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -18.69% | 69.93% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -24.18% | 62.34% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
ConocoPhillips (COP) at 1.29 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 0.57 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for LNG.
COP
Energy industry group
1.29
- Max
- 3.33
- Q3
- 2.13
- Median
- 1.31
- COP
- 1.29
- Q1
- 0.83
- Min
- 0.08
LNG
Energy industry group
0.57
- Max
- 3.33
- Q3
- 2.13
- Median
- 1.31
- Q1
- 0.83
- LNG
- 0.57
- Min
- 0.08
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
ConocoPhillips (COP) at 0.36 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 3.21 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.
COP
Energy industry group
0.36
- Max
- 2.02
- Q3
- 1.01
- Median
- 0.61
- COP
- 0.36
- Q1
- 0.32
- Min
- 0.00
LNG
Energy industry group
3.21
- LNG
- 3.21
- Max
- 2.02
- Q3
- 1.01
- Median
- 0.61
- Q1
- 0.32
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | COP | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.29 | 0.57 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.36 | 3.21 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.73 | 4.39 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 3.09% and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 0.88% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
COP
Energy industry group
3.09%
- Max
- 8.56%
- Q3
- 3.47%
- COP
- 3.09%
- Median
- 1.60%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LNG
Energy industry group
0.88%
- Max
- 8.56%
- Q3
- 3.47%
- Median
- 1.60%
- LNG
- 0.88%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 54.92% and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 35.70% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
COP
Energy industry group
54.92%
- Max
- 139.86%
- Q3
- 63.37%
- COP
- 54.92%
- Median
- 31.85%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LNG
Energy industry group
35.70%
- Max
- 139.86%
- Q3
- 63.37%
- LNG
- 35.70%
- Median
- 31.85%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | COP | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.09% | 0.88% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 54.92% | 35.70% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
ConocoPhillips (COP) at 17.56 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 41.71 sits in the richer quartile — LNG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
COP
Energy industry group
17.56
- Max
- 55.25
- Q3
- 30.38
- COP
- 17.56
- Median
- 17.01
- Q1
- 10.34
- Min
- 1.69
LNG
Energy industry group
41.71
- Max
- 55.25
- LNG
- 41.71
- Q3
- 30.38
- Median
- 17.01
- Q1
- 10.34
- Min
- 1.69
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.13 and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 2.48 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
COP
Energy industry group
2.13
- Max
- 5.83
- Q3
- 2.94
- COP
- 2.13
- Median
- 1.73
- Q1
- 0.93
- Min
- 0.00
LNG
Energy industry group
2.48
- Max
- 5.83
- Q3
- 2.94
- LNG
- 2.48
- Median
- 1.73
- Q1
- 0.93
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
ConocoPhillips (COP) at 1.96 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 13.77 prices above its benchmark range — LNG looks rich relative to book.
COP
Energy industry group
1.96
- Max
- 4.70
- Q3
- 2.61
- COP
- 1.96
- Median
- 1.61
- Q1
- 1.11
- Min
- 0.01
LNG
Energy industry group
13.77
- LNG
- 13.77
- Max
- 4.70
- Q3
- 2.61
- Median
- 1.61
- Q1
- 1.11
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | COP | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 17.56 | 41.71 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.13 | 2.48 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.96 | 13.77 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4.19% | 3.34% |