COP vs. EXE: ConocoPhillips vs. Expand Energy Stock Comparison
How do ConocoPhillips (COP) and Expand Energy (EXE) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
ConocoPhillips (COP) and Expand Energy (EXE) are both classified in the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production sub-industry within the broader Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
ConocoPhillips (COP) has more than two decades of public-market history since December 31, 1981, whereas Expand Energy (EXE) listed on February 10, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.
| Profile Item | COP | EXE |
|---|---|---|
| Name | ConocoPhillips | Expand Energy Corp |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Capitalization | 161.12 billion USD | 19.54 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | December 31, 1981 | February 10, 2021 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | COP | EXE |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 62.02% | -22.30% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 9.29% | 4.93% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 16.40% | 9.88% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | COP | EXE |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 31.63% | 29.72% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.19 | 0.40 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -36.30% | -30.37% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 6.60M | 3.10M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | COP | EXE |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.83 | -0.89 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.70 | -1.27 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 17.66% and Expand Energy (EXE) at 14.62% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
COP
Energy industry group
17.66%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- COP
- 17.66%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
EXE
Energy industry group
14.62%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- EXE
- 14.62%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 16.76% and Expand Energy (EXE) at 21.26% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
COP
Energy industry group
16.76%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- COP
- 16.76%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
EXE
Energy industry group
21.26%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- EXE
- 21.26%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 30.05% and Expand Energy (EXE) at 23.18% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
COP
Energy industry group
30.05%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- COP
- 30.05%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
EXE
Energy industry group
23.18%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- EXE
- 23.18%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | COP | EXE |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 17.66% | 14.62% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.98% | 8.17% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 16.76% | 21.26% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 30.05% | 23.18% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 49.01% | 45.86% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Expand Energy (EXE) at 188.77% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than ConocoPhillips (COP) at 7.67%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: ConocoPhillips (COP) reports EPS growth of -18.69%, ranked against its industry; Expand Energy (EXE) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | COP | EXE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 7.67% | 188.77% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -9.11% | 2.13% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -18.69% | -- |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -24.18% | -39.01% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 1.52 and Expand Energy (EXE) at 0.90 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
COP
Energy industry group
1.52
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- COP
- 1.52
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
EXE
Energy industry group
0.90
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- EXE
- 0.90
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Expand Energy (EXE) at 0.24 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 0.35 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
COP
Energy industry group
0.35
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- COP
- 0.35
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
EXE
Energy industry group
0.24
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- EXE
- 0.24
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | COP | EXE |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.52 | 0.90 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.35 | 0.24 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.45 | 0.68 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.48% and Expand Energy (EXE) at 2.70% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
COP
Energy industry group
2.48%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- COP
- 2.48%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EXE
Energy industry group
2.70%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- EXE
- 2.70%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 35.41% and Expand Energy (EXE) at 19.84% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
COP
Energy industry group
35.41%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- COP
- 35.41%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EXE
Energy industry group
19.84%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- EXE
- 19.84%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | COP | EXE |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.48% | 2.70% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 35.41% | 19.84% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Expand Energy (EXE) at 7.30 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 14.36 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for EXE, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
COP
Energy industry group
14.36
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- COP
- 14.36
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
EXE
Energy industry group
7.30
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- EXE
- 7.30
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.34 and Expand Energy (EXE) at 1.51 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
COP
Energy industry group
2.34
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- COP
- 2.34
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
EXE
Energy industry group
1.51
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- EXE
- 1.51
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Expand Energy (EXE) at 1.00 looks cheap against book in the lower P/B ratio quartile, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.44 carries a premium in the upper quartile — a clear price-to-book gap.
COP
Energy industry group
2.44
- Max
- 4.21
- COP
- 2.44
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
EXE
Energy industry group
1.00
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- EXE
- 1.00
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | COP | EXE |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 14.36 | 7.30 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.34 | 1.51 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.44 | 1.00 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 7.12% | 7.00% |