COP vs. ENB: ConocoPhillips vs. Enbridge Stock Comparison
How do ConocoPhillips (COP) and Enbridge (ENB) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
ConocoPhillips (COP) and Enbridge (ENB) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though COP is classified under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while ENB falls under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation.
| Profile Item | COP | ENB |
|---|---|---|
| Name | ConocoPhillips | Enbridge Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation |
| Market Capitalization | 161.12 billion USD | 104.51 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | December 31, 1981 | March 15, 1984 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | COP | ENB |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 62.02% | 3.49% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 9.29% | 19.14% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 16.40% | 8.72% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | COP | ENB |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 31.63% | 18.30% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.19 | 0.59 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -36.30% | -28.31% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 6.60M | 5.05M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | COP | ENB |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.83 | -0.04 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.70 | -0.06 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 17.66% and Enbridge (ENB) at 9.22% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
COP
Energy industry group
17.66%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- COP
- 17.66%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
ENB
Energy industry group
9.22%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- ENB
- 9.22%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 16.76% and Enbridge (ENB) at 7.34% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
COP
Energy industry group
16.76%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- COP
- 16.76%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
ENB
Energy industry group
7.34%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- ENB
- 7.34%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 30.05% and Enbridge (ENB) at 10.16% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
COP
Energy industry group
30.05%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- COP
- 30.05%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
ENB
Energy industry group
10.16%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- ENB
- 10.16%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | COP | ENB |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 17.66% | 9.22% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.98% | 3.29% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 16.76% | 7.34% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 30.05% | 10.16% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 49.01% | 32.59% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Enbridge (ENB) at 21.92% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 7.67% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for ENB.
EPS Growth
Enbridge (ENB) at 37.61% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at -18.69% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for ENB.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | COP | ENB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 7.67% | 21.92% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -9.11% | 6.94% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -18.69% | 37.61% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -24.18% | 36.00% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
ConocoPhillips (COP) at 1.52 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Enbridge (ENB) at 0.72 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for ENB.
COP
Energy industry group
1.52
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- COP
- 1.52
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
ENB
Energy industry group
0.72
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- ENB
- 0.72
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
ConocoPhillips (COP) at 0.35 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Enbridge (ENB) at 1.63 uses more debt funding than most peers.
COP
Energy industry group
0.35
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- COP
- 0.35
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
ENB
Energy industry group
1.63
- Max
- 1.75
- ENB
- 1.63
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | COP | ENB |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.52 | 0.72 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.35 | 1.63 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.45 | 6.33 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Enbridge (ENB) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile ConocoPhillips (COP) reports a yield of 2.48%, ranking against industry peers normally.
COP
Energy industry group
2.48%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- COP
- 2.48%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ENB
Energy industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- ENB
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Enbridge (ENB) reports payout ratio above 100% at 147.68%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile ConocoPhillips (COP) reports 35.41%, ranking against industry peers normally.
COP
Energy industry group
35.41%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- COP
- 35.41%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ENB
Energy industry group
147.68%
- ENB
- 147.68%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | COP | ENB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.48% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 35.41% | 147.68% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
ConocoPhillips (COP) at 14.36 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Enbridge (ENB) at 22.65 sits in the richer quartile — ENB needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
COP
Energy industry group
14.36
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- COP
- 14.36
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
ENB
Energy industry group
22.65
- Max
- 39.54
- ENB
- 22.65
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.34 and Enbridge (ENB) at 1.25 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
COP
Energy industry group
2.34
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- COP
- 2.34
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
ENB
Energy industry group
1.25
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- ENB
- 1.25
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.44 and Enbridge (ENB) at 2.59 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.
COP
Energy industry group
2.44
- Max
- 4.21
- COP
- 2.44
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
ENB
Energy industry group
2.59
- Max
- 4.21
- ENB
- 2.59
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | COP | ENB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 14.36 | 22.65 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.34 | 1.25 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.44 | 2.59 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 7.12% | -1.01% |