COP vs. ENB: ConocoPhillips vs. Enbridge Stock Comparison

June 13, 2026

This page compares ConocoPhillips (COP) with Enbridge (ENB) using performance and risk, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividends, and valuation metrics.

Performance

Cumulative Growth

COP

ENB

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Enbridge (ENB): Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Enbridge (ENB). Returns over one year are annualized.

Performance at a Glance

Performance metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Enbridge (ENB)
Metric	COP	ENB
1-Year Return	27.63%	25.66%

Risk

Drawdown

COP

ENB

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Enbridge (ENB): Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Risk at a Glance

Risk metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Enbridge (ENB)
Metric	COP	ENB
1-Year Volatility	29.36%	16.14%
Beta	0.10	0.57
3-Month Avg. Volume	8.60M	4.53M

Company Profile

ConocoPhillips (COP) and Enbridge (ENB) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though COP is classified under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while ENB falls under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation.

Company profile comparison for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Enbridge (ENB)
Profile Item	COP	ENB
Name	ConocoPhillips	Enbridge Inc.
Country/Region	United States	Canada
GICS Sector	Energy	Energy
GICS Industry Group	Energy	Energy
GICS Industry	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-Industry	Oil & Gas Exploration & Production	Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation
Market Capitalization	142.52 billion USD	123.38 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	December 31, 1981	March 15, 1984
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 19.83 and Enbridge (ENB) at 26.78 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

COP

Energy industry group

19.83

Max: 59.12
Q3: 31.56
COP: 19.83
Median: 18.65
Q1: 10.91
Min: 1.74

ENB

Energy industry group

26.78

Max: 59.12
Q3: 31.56
ENB: 26.78
Median: 18.65
Q1: 10.91
Min: 1.74

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Enbridge (ENB): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.40 and Enbridge (ENB) at 1.79 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

COP

Energy industry group

2.40

Max: 5.26
Q3: 3.09
COP: 2.40
Median: 1.90
Q1: 1.06
Min: 0.00

ENB

Energy industry group

1.79

Max: 5.26
Q3: 3.09
Median: 1.90
ENB: 1.79
Q1: 1.06
Min: 0.00

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Enbridge (ENB): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.21 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Enbridge (ENB) at 2.96 carries an above-peer premium to book — ENB is pricier on assets.

COP

Energy industry group

2.21

Max: 5.53
Q3: 2.95
COP: 2.21
Median: 1.81
Q1: 1.21
Min: -0.02

ENB

Energy industry group

2.96

Max: 5.53
ENB: 2.96
Q3: 2.95
Median: 1.81
Q1: 1.21
Min: -0.02

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Enbridge (ENB): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

Valuation metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Enbridge (ENB)
Metric	COP	ENB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	19.83	26.78
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.40	1.79
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	2.21	2.96
Free Cash Flow Yield	3.71%	-1.16%

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 11.28% and Enbridge (ENB) at 10.13% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

COP

Energy industry group

11.28%

Max: 37.23%
Q3: 16.04%
COP: 11.28%
Median: 9.26%
Q1: -0.84%
Min: -20.70%

ENB

Energy industry group

10.13%

Max: 37.23%
Q3: 16.04%
ENB: 10.13%
Median: 9.26%
Q1: -0.84%
Min: -20.70%

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Enbridge (ENB): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 12.33% and Enbridge (ENB) at 10.00% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

COP

Energy industry group

12.33%

Max: 46.37%
Q3: 18.61%
COP: 12.33%
Median: 6.23%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -27.23%

ENB

Energy industry group

10.00%

Max: 46.37%
Q3: 18.61%
ENB: 10.00%
Median: 6.23%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -27.23%

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Enbridge (ENB): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 22.05% and Enbridge (ENB) at 14.73% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

COP

Energy industry group

22.05%

Max: 68.02%
Q3: 28.39%
COP: 22.05%
Median: 11.81%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -41.46%

ENB

Energy industry group

14.73%

Max: 68.02%
Q3: 28.39%
ENB: 14.73%
Median: 11.81%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -41.46%

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Enbridge (ENB): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

Profitability metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Enbridge (ENB)
Metric	COP	ENB
Return on Equity (TTM)	11.28%	10.13%
Return on Assets (TTM)	5.87%	3.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	12.33%	10.00%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	22.05%	14.73%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	45.59%	38.86%

Growth

Revenue Growth

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Enbridge (ENB): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth at a Glance

Revenue growth metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Enbridge (ENB)
Metric	COP	ENB
1-Year Revenue Growth	7.67%	21.92%
3-Year Revenue CAGR	-9.11%	6.94%

EPS Growth

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Enbridge (ENB): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth at a Glance

EPS growth metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Enbridge (ENB)
Metric	COP	ENB
1-Year EPS Growth	-18.69%	37.61%
3-Year EPS CAGR	-24.18%	36.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ConocoPhillips (COP) at 1.29 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Enbridge (ENB) at 0.81 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for ENB.

COP

Energy industry group

1.29

Max: 3.33
Q3: 2.13
Median: 1.31
COP: 1.29
Q1: 0.83
Min: 0.08

ENB

Energy industry group

0.81

Max: 3.33
Q3: 2.13
Median: 1.31
Q1: 0.83
ENB: 0.81
Min: 0.08

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Enbridge (ENB): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

ConocoPhillips (COP) at 0.36 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Enbridge (ENB) at 1.60 uses more debt funding than most peers.

COP

Energy industry group

0.36

Max: 2.00
Q3: 0.99
Median: 0.61
COP: 0.36
Q1: 0.31
Min: 0.00

ENB

Energy industry group

1.60

Max: 2.00
ENB: 1.60
Q3: 0.99
Median: 0.61
Q1: 0.31
Min: 0.00

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Enbridge (ENB): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Financial strength metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Enbridge (ENB)
Metric	COP	ENB
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.29	0.81
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.36	1.60
Net Debt / EBITDA	0.73	6.33

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Enbridge (ENB) at 4.98% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.87% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, ENB the richer one.

COP

Energy industry group

2.87%

Max: 9.21%
Q3: 3.69%
COP: 2.87%
Median: 1.84%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

ENB

Energy industry group

4.98%

Max: 9.21%
ENB: 4.98%
Q3: 3.69%
Median: 1.84%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Enbridge (ENB): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Enbridge (ENB) reports payout ratio above 100% at 128.73%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile ConocoPhillips (COP) reports 54.92%, ranking against industry peers normally.

COP

Energy industry group

54.92%

Max: 139.86%
Q3: 61.97%
COP: 54.92%
Median: 31.01%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

ENB

Energy industry group

128.73%

Max: 139.86%
ENB: 128.73%
Q3: 61.97%
Median: 31.01%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. Enbridge (ENB): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividends at a Glance

Dividend metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and Enbridge (ENB)
Metric	COP	ENB
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.87%	4.98%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	54.92%	128.73%