COP vs. DINO: ConocoPhillips vs. HF Sinclair Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do ConocoPhillips (COP) and HF Sinclair (DINO) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

ConocoPhillips (COP) and HF Sinclair (DINO) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though COP is classified under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while DINO falls under Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing.

Company profile comparison for ConocoPhillips (COP) and HF Sinclair (DINO)
Profile Item	COP	DINO
Name	ConocoPhillips	HF Sinclair Corporation
Country/Region	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Energy	Energy
GICS Industry Group	Energy	Energy
GICS Industry	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-Industry	Oil & Gas Exploration & Production	Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Market Capitalization	161.12 billion USD	16.45 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	December 31, 1981	March 17, 1980
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

COP

DINO

GSPC

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. HF Sinclair (DINO), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for ConocoPhillips (COP) and HF Sinclair (DINO). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for ConocoPhillips (COP) and HF Sinclair (DINO). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and HF Sinclair (DINO)
Metric	COP	DINO
Total Return (1Y)	62.02%	90.18%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	9.29%	29.39%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	16.40%	28.64%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

COP

DINO

GSPC

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. HF Sinclair (DINO), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for ConocoPhillips (COP) and HF Sinclair (DINO). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and HF Sinclair (DINO)
Metric	COP	DINO
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	31.63%	41.52%
Beta (5Y)	0.19	0.76
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-36.30%	-57.35%
Avg. Volume (3M)	6.60M	2.52M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

COP and DINO are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and HF Sinclair (DINO)
Metric	COP	DINO
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	1.83	2.07
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	2.70	3.06

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

HF Sinclair (DINO) at 33.21% sits in the top ROE quartile, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 17.66% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for DINO.

COP

Energy industry group

17.66%

Max: 53.85%
Q3: 24.79%
COP: 17.66%
Median: 12.85%
Q1: 2.03%
Min: -29.09%

DINO

Energy industry group

33.21%

Max: 53.85%
DINO: 33.21%
Q3: 24.79%
Median: 12.85%
Q1: 2.03%
Min: -29.09%

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. HF Sinclair (DINO): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 16.76% and HF Sinclair (DINO) at 10.13% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

COP

Energy industry group

16.76%

Max: 56.92%
Q3: 22.92%
COP: 16.76%
Median: 10.10%
Q1: 0.07%
Min: -27.38%

DINO

Energy industry group

10.13%

Max: 56.92%
Q3: 22.92%
DINO: 10.13%
Median: 10.10%
Q1: 0.07%
Min: -27.38%

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. HF Sinclair (DINO): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 30.05% and HF Sinclair (DINO) at 25.13% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

COP

Energy industry group

30.05%

Max: 71.31%
Q3: 33.75%
COP: 30.05%
Median: 18.73%
Q1: 6.94%
Min: -24.52%

DINO

Energy industry group

25.13%

Max: 71.31%
Q3: 33.75%
DINO: 25.13%
Median: 18.73%
Q1: 6.94%
Min: -24.52%

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. HF Sinclair (DINO): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and HF Sinclair (DINO)
Metric	COP	DINO
ROE (TTM)	17.66%	33.21%
ROA (TTM)	8.98%	15.77%
Net Margin (TTM)	16.76%	10.13%
Operating Margin (TTM)	30.05%	25.13%
Gross Margin (TTM)	49.01%	18.01%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 7.67% and HF Sinclair (DINO) at -5.99% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. HF Sinclair (DINO): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

HF Sinclair (DINO) at 238.46% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than ConocoPhillips (COP) at -18.69%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. HF Sinclair (DINO): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and HF Sinclair (DINO)
Metric	COP	DINO
Revenue Growth (YoY)	7.67%	-5.99%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	-9.11%	-11.07%
EPS Growth (YoY)	-18.69%	238.46%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	-24.18%	-40.03%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

ConocoPhillips (COP) at 1.52 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while HF Sinclair (DINO) at 2.27 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

COP

Energy industry group

1.52

Max: 3.64
Q3: 2.21
COP: 1.52
Median: 1.41
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.24

DINO

Energy industry group

2.27

Max: 3.64
DINO: 2.27
Q3: 2.21
Median: 1.41
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.24

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. HF Sinclair (DINO): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

HF Sinclair (DINO) at 0.29 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 0.35 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

COP

Energy industry group

0.35

Max: 1.75
Q3: 0.93
Median: 0.54
COP: 0.35
Q1: 0.30
Min: 0.00

DINO

Energy industry group

0.29

Max: 1.75
Q3: 0.93
Median: 0.54
Q1: 0.30
DINO: 0.29
Min: 0.00

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. HF Sinclair (DINO): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and HF Sinclair (DINO)
Metric	COP	DINO
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.52	2.27
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	0.35	0.29
Net Debt / EBITDA	0.45	0.01

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.48% and HF Sinclair (DINO) at 2.07% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

COP

Energy industry group

2.48%

Max: 8.57%
Q3: 3.58%
COP: 2.48%
Median: 1.71%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

DINO

Energy industry group

2.07%

Max: 8.57%
Q3: 3.58%
DINO: 2.07%
Median: 1.71%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. HF Sinclair (DINO): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both ConocoPhillips (COP) at 35.41% and HF Sinclair (DINO) at 10.32% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

COP

Energy industry group

35.41%

Max: 133.24%
Q3: 53.31%
COP: 35.41%
Median: 25.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

DINO

Energy industry group

10.32%

Max: 133.24%
Q3: 53.31%
Median: 25.24%
DINO: 10.32%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. HF Sinclair (DINO): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and HF Sinclair (DINO)
Metric	COP	DINO
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.48%	2.07%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	35.41%	10.32%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

HF Sinclair (DINO) at 4.95 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 14.36 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for DINO, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

COP

Energy industry group

14.36

Max: 39.54
Q3: 21.72
COP: 14.36
Median: 12.19
Q1: 7.71
Min: 2.99

DINO

Energy industry group

4.95

Max: 39.54
Q3: 21.72
Median: 12.19
Q1: 7.71
DINO: 4.95
Min: 2.99

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. HF Sinclair (DINO): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

HF Sinclair (DINO) at 0.47 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.34 prices around its industry’s middle — DINO costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

COP

Energy industry group

2.34

Max: 5.40
Q3: 2.85
COP: 2.34
Median: 1.69
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.00

DINO

Energy industry group

0.47

Max: 5.40
Q3: 2.85
Median: 1.69
Q1: 0.88
DINO: 0.47
Min: 0.00

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. HF Sinclair (DINO): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

HF Sinclair (DINO) at 1.43 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while ConocoPhillips (COP) at 2.44 carries an above-peer premium to book — COP is pricier on assets.

COP

Energy industry group

2.44

Max: 4.21
COP: 2.44
Q3: 2.38
Median: 1.51
Q1: 1.08
Min: 0.01

DINO

Energy industry group

1.43

Max: 4.21
Q3: 2.38
Median: 1.51
DINO: 1.43
Q1: 1.08
Min: 0.01

ConocoPhillips (COP) vs. HF Sinclair (DINO): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for ConocoPhillips (COP) and HF Sinclair (DINO)
Metric	COP	DINO
P/E Ratio (TTM)	14.36	4.95
P/S Ratio (TTM)	2.34	0.47
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	2.44	1.43
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	7.12%	18.17%