COIN vs. GPN: Coinbase Global vs. Global Payments Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Coinbase Global (COIN) and Global Payments (GPN) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but COIN is classified in Capital Markets while GPN is classified in Financial Services.

Global Payments (GPN) has more than two decades of public-market history since January 16, 2001, whereas Coinbase Global (COIN) listed on April 14, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Coinbase Global (COIN) carries a highly aggressive beta of 3.33, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Global Payments (GPN) is closer to market-like at 0.80 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Coinbase Global (COIN) reports a negative ROE of -4.68%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Global Payments (GPN) reports 0.84%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Both Coinbase Global (COIN) at -12.89% and Global Payments (GPN) at -11.21% report negative net margin values, usually indicating net losses over the period.

Coinbase Global (COIN) reports a negative operating margin of -1.42%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Global Payments (GPN) reports 15.73%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Coinbase Global (COIN) at 9.40% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Global Payments (GPN) at -0.39% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Global Payments (GPN) at -6.17% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Coinbase Global (COIN) at -53.06% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Coinbase Global (COIN) in Financial Services and Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Coinbase Global (COIN) in Financial Services and Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Coinbase Global (COIN) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Global Payments (GPN) reports a yield of 1.05%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Global Payments (GPN) reports payout ratio above 100% at 178.57%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings; Coinbase Global (COIN) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%).

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Global Payments (GPN) trades at 173.93 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Coinbase Global (COIN) has no P/E ratio this period.

Global Payments (GPN) at 2.24 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Coinbase Global (COIN) at 6.56 sits in the pricier quartile — COIN costs more per dollar of sales.

On P/B ratio, both Coinbase Global (COIN) at 2.56 and Global Payments (GPN) at 1.11 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics