CNQ vs. CVE: Canadian Natural Resources vs. Cenovus Energy Stock Comparison
How do Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) and Cenovus Energy (CVE) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) and Cenovus Energy (CVE) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though CNQ is classified under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while CVE falls under Integrated Oil & Gas.
| Profile Item | CNQ | CVE |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. | Cenovus Energy Inc. |
| Country/Region | Canada | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Integrated Oil & Gas |
| Market Capitalization | 98.81 billion USD | 49.61 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | July 31, 2000 | November 17, 2009 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CNQ | CVE |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 56.47% | 60.99% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 19.27% | 19.41% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 23.01% | 18.63% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CNQ | CVE |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 32.07% | 37.47% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.48 | 0.43 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -35.85% | -53.51% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 6.32M | 6.90M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CNQ | CVE |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.63 | 1.51 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.31 | 2.20 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 32.39% and Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 27.44% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.
CNQ
Energy industry group
32.39%
- Max
- 53.85%
- CNQ
- 32.39%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
CVE
Energy industry group
27.44%
- Max
- 53.85%
- CVE
- 27.44%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 29.51% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 15.42%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
CNQ
Energy industry group
29.51%
- Max
- 56.92%
- CNQ
- 29.51%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
CVE
Energy industry group
15.42%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- CVE
- 15.42%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 32.24% and Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 26.58% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CNQ
Energy industry group
32.24%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- CNQ
- 32.24%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
CVE
Energy industry group
26.58%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- CVE
- 26.58%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CNQ | CVE |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 32.39% | 27.44% |
| ROA (TTM) | 9.97% | 12.05% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 29.51% | 15.42% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 32.24% | 26.58% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 52.92% | 33.92% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 6.40% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at -8.62% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 81.05% and Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 28.74% sit in the top peer quartile for EPS growth, so each is compounding per-share earnings faster than typical industry peers.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CNQ | CVE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 6.40% | -8.62% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -3.75% | -9.75% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 81.05% | 28.74% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 2.73% | -12.42% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 0.99 and Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.64 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
CNQ
Energy industry group
0.99
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- CNQ
- 0.99
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
CVE
Energy industry group
1.64
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- CVE
- 1.64
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 0.42 and Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.33 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
CNQ
Energy industry group
0.42
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- CNQ
- 0.42
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
CVE
Energy industry group
0.33
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- CVE
- 0.33
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CNQ | CVE |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.99 | 1.64 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.42 | 0.33 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.67 | 0.35 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 5.03% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 3.04% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, CNQ the richer one.
CNQ
Energy industry group
5.03%
- Max
- 8.57%
- CNQ
- 5.03%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
CVE
Energy industry group
3.04%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- CVE
- 3.04%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 36.37% and Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 22.84% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
CNQ
Energy industry group
36.37%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- CNQ
- 36.37%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
CVE
Energy industry group
22.84%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- CVE
- 22.84%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CNQ | CVE |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 5.03% | 3.04% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 36.37% | 22.84% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 9.95 and Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 10.56 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CNQ
Energy industry group
9.95
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- CNQ
- 9.95
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
CVE
Energy industry group
10.56
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- CVE
- 10.56
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.88 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 2.06 prices around its industry’s middle — CVE costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
CNQ
Energy industry group
2.06
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- CNQ
- 2.06
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
CVE
Energy industry group
0.88
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- CVE
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.98 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) at 2.97 carries an above-peer premium to book — CNQ is pricier on assets.
CNQ
Energy industry group
2.97
- Max
- 4.21
- CNQ
- 2.97
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
CVE
Energy industry group
1.98
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- CVE
- 1.98
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CNQ | CVE |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 9.95 | 10.56 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.06 | 0.88 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.97 | 1.98 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 12.33% | 20.71% |