Seek Returns logo

CNH vs. SNA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CNH and SNA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCNHSNA
Company NameCNH Industrial N.V.Snap-on Incorporated
CountryUnited KingdomUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryMachinery
Market Capitalization16.05 billion USD17.41 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 30, 2013February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CNH and SNA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CNH vs. SNA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCNHSNA
5-Day Price Return3.13%4.00%
13-Week Price Return-3.53%2.09%
26-Week Price Return5.34%-1.77%
52-Week Price Return35.77%24.64%
Month-to-Date Return-1.00%3.93%
Year-to-Date Return13.24%-1.67%
10-Day Avg. Volume12.88M0.25M
3-Month Avg. Volume18.37M0.37M
3-Month Volatility28.28%23.78%
Beta1.550.79

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CNH

10.67%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

CNH’s Return on Equity of 10.67% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SNA

18.10%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

SNA’s Return on Equity of 18.10% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CNH vs. SNA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CNH

4.55%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CNH’s Net Profit Margin of 4.55% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

SNA

19.72%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.72% places SNA in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CNH vs. SNA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CNH

17.85%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.85% places CNH in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SNA

25.57%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.57% places SNA in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CNH vs. SNA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCNHSNA
Return on Equity (TTM)10.67%18.10%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.91%12.45%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.55%19.72%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.85%25.57%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)32.40%51.96%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CNH

1.24

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

CNH’s Current Ratio of 1.24 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SNA

4.48

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

SNA’s Current Ratio of 4.48 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Machinery industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

CNH vs. SNA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CNH

3.55

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.55, CNH operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Machinery industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

SNA

0.21

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, SNA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CNH vs. SNA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CNH

1.93

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CNH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.93 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

SNA

65.15

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

SNA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 65.15 is in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

CNH vs. SNA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCNHSNA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.244.48
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.453.23
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.550.21
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.9365.15

Growth

Revenue Growth

CNH vs. SNA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CNH vs. SNA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CNH

2.08%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

CNH’s Dividend Yield of 2.08% is consistent with its peers in the Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SNA

2.55%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

SNA’s Dividend Yield of 2.55% is consistent with its peers in the Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CNH vs. SNA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CNH

40.58%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

CNH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.58% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SNA

43.42%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

SNA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 43.42% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CNH vs. SNA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCNHSNA
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.08%2.55%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)40.58%43.42%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CNH

19.51

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

CNH’s P/E Ratio of 19.51 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SNA

17.06

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

SNA’s P/E Ratio of 17.06 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CNH vs. SNA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CNH

0.89

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CNH’s P/S Ratio of 0.89 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

SNA

3.36

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

SNA’s P/S Ratio of 3.36 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CNH vs. SNA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CNH

2.10

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

CNH’s P/B Ratio of 2.10 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SNA

2.85

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

SNA’s P/B Ratio of 2.85 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CNH vs. SNA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Machinery industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCNHSNA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)19.5117.06
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.893.36
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.102.85
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)7.1816.69