CNH vs. IR: CNH Industrial vs. Ingersoll Rand Stock Comparison
How do CNH Industrial (CNH) and Ingersoll Rand (IR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
CNH Industrial (CNH) and Ingersoll Rand (IR) both belong to the Machinery industry, though CNH is classified under Agricultural & Farm Machinery while IR falls under Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components.
| Profile Item | CNH | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | CNH Industrial N.V. | Ingersoll Rand Inc. |
| Country/Region | United Kingdom | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Machinery | Machinery |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Agricultural & Farm Machinery | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components |
| Market Capitalization | 18.59 billion USD | 31.87 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | September 30, 2013 | May 12, 2017 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CNH | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 38.02% | 12.39% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 11.70% | 9.19% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -0.45% | 8.02% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CNH | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 45.52% | 34.08% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.19 | 1.12 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -43.80% | -36.62% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 18.71M | 4.27M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CNH | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.74 | 0.24 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.25 | 0.37 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 13.41% is around its peer norm for ROE, while CNH Industrial (CNH) at 3.91% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.
CNH
Capital Goods industry group
3.91%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- CNH
- 3.91%
- Min
- -17.12%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
13.41%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- IR
- 13.41%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 17.20% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of CNH Industrial (CNH) at 1.71%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
CNH
Capital Goods industry group
1.71%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- CNH
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
17.20%
- Max
- 27.47%
- IR
- 17.20%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 18.79% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of CNH Industrial (CNH) at 5.54%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
CNH
Capital Goods industry group
5.54%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- CNH
- 5.54%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
18.79%
- Max
- 36.60%
- IR
- 18.79%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CNH | IR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 3.91% | 13.41% |
| ROA (TTM) | 0.87% | 4.98% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 1.71% | 17.20% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 5.54% | 18.79% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 17.76% | 42.57% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 5.75% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while CNH Industrial (CNH) at -8.78% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both CNH Industrial (CNH) at -58.59% and Ingersoll Rand (IR) at -29.61% post bottom-quartile EPS growth versus peers, pointing to weaker earnings momentum than typical rivals.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CNH | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -8.78% | 5.75% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -8.41% | 8.95% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -58.59% | -29.61% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -34.96% | -0.46% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 1.69 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while CNH Industrial (CNH) at 4.88 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.
CNH
Capital Goods industry group
4.88
- Max
- 5.22
- CNH
- 4.88
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
IR
Capital Goods industry group
1.69
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- IR
- 1.69
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.46 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while CNH Industrial (CNH) at 3.35 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.
CNH
Capital Goods industry group
3.35
- CNH
- 3.35
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.46
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- IR
- 0.46
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CNH | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 4.88 | 1.69 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 3.35 | 0.46 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 23.62 | 1.76 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both CNH Industrial (CNH) at 0.89% and Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 0.10% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
CNH
Capital Goods industry group
0.89%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- CNH
- 0.89%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
0.10%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- IR
- 0.10%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 2.27% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while CNH Industrial (CNH) at 40.00% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
CNH
Capital Goods industry group
40.00%
- Max
- 67.39%
- CNH
- 40.00%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
IR
Capital Goods industry group
2.27%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- IR
- 2.27%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CNH | IR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.89% | 0.10% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 40.00% | 2.27% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 23.51 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while CNH Industrial (CNH) at 46.24 sits in the richer quartile — CNH needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
CNH
Capital Goods industry group
46.24
- Max
- 59.38
- CNH
- 46.24
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
IR
Capital Goods industry group
23.51
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- IR
- 23.51
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
CNH Industrial (CNH) at 1.02 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.96 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.
CNH
Capital Goods industry group
1.02
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- CNH
- 1.02
- Min
- 0.03
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.96
- Max
- 7.54
- IR
- 3.96
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both CNH Industrial (CNH) at 1.84 and Ingersoll Rand (IR) at 3.03 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
CNH
Capital Goods industry group
1.84
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- CNH
- 1.84
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
IR
Capital Goods industry group
3.03
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- IR
- 3.03
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CNH | IR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 46.24 | 23.51 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.02 | 3.96 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.84 | 3.03 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.03% | 3.19% |