CMI vs. NOC: Cummins vs. Northrop Grumman Stock Comparison
How do Cummins (CMI) and Northrop Grumman (NOC) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Cummins (CMI) and Northrop Grumman (NOC) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but CMI is classified in Machinery while NOC is classified in Aerospace & Defense.
| Profile Item | CMI | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Cummins Inc. | Northrop Grumman Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Machinery | Aerospace & Defense |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Construction Machinery & Heavy Transportation Equipment | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Capitalization | 61.69 billion USD | 74.59 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 21, 1973 | December 31, 1981 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CMI | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -0.52% | -3.34% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 31.79% | 7.23% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 17.12% | 9.98% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Northrop Grumman (NOC) reports a negative beta of -0.12, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Cummins (CMI) has a non-negative beta of 1.26.
| Metric | CMI | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 36.83% | 28.86% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.26 | -0.12 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -38.12% | -37.80% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.14M | 902.47K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CMI | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.13 | -0.26 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.18 | -0.37 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Cummins (CMI) at 25.05% and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 26.07% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
25.05%
- Max
- 40.55%
- CMI
- 25.05%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
26.07%
- Max
- 40.55%
- NOC
- 26.07%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Cummins (CMI) at 9.26% and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 10.37% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
9.26%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- CMI
- 9.26%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
10.37%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- NOC
- 10.37%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Cummins (CMI) at 13.95% and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 12.91% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
13.95%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- CMI
- 13.95%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
12.91%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- NOC
- 12.91%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CMI | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 25.05% | 26.07% |
| ROA (TTM) | 7.60% | 7.11% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 9.26% | 10.37% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 13.95% | 12.91% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 26.32% | 20.03% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 2.24% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Cummins (CMI) at -1.27% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 2.61% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Cummins (CMI) at -27.74% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CMI | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -1.27% | 2.24% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 6.25% | 4.65% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -27.74% | 2.61% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 10.68% | -2.60% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Cummins (CMI) at 1.74 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.23 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for NOC.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
1.74
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- CMI
- 1.74
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
1.23
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- NOC
- 1.23
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Cummins (CMI) at 0.52 and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 0.93 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
0.52
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- CMI
- 0.52
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
0.93
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- NOC
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CMI | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.74 | 1.23 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.52 | 0.93 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.62 | 1.87 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Cummins (CMI) at 1.83% and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.82% offer top-quartile dividend income relative to share price within their industries.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
1.83%
- Max
- 2.66%
- CMI
- 1.83%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
1.82%
- Max
- 2.66%
- NOC
- 1.82%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Cummins (CMI) at 34.21% and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 30.18% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
34.21%
- Max
- 67.39%
- CMI
- 34.21%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
30.18%
- Max
- 67.39%
- NOC
- 30.18%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CMI | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.83% | 1.82% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 34.21% | 30.18% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Cummins (CMI) at 18.78 and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 16.57 sit in the cheaper earnings-multiple quartile for P/E ratio, with the market paying less for a dollar of trailing earnings than it pays for typical peers.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
18.78
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- CMI
- 18.78
- Min
- 3.03
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
16.57
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- NOC
- 16.57
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Cummins (CMI) at 1.72 and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.71 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
1.72
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- CMI
- 1.72
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
1.71
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- NOC
- 1.71
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Cummins (CMI) at 4.63 and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 3.99 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
CMI
Capital Goods industry group
4.63
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- CMI
- 4.63
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
3.99
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- NOC
- 3.99
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CMI | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 18.78 | 16.57 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.72 | 1.71 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 4.63 | 3.99 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4.06% | 4.21% |