CLS vs. ZBRA: Celestica vs. Zebra Stock Comparison
How do Celestica (CLS) and Zebra (ZBRA) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Celestica (CLS) and Zebra (ZBRA) both belong to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, though CLS is classified under Electronic Manufacturing Services while ZBRA falls under Electronic Equipment & Instruments.
| Profile Item | CLS | ZBRA |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Celestica Inc. | Zebra Technologies Corp. Class A Common Stock |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Information Technology | Information Technology |
| GICS Industry Group | Technology Hardware & Equipment | Technology Hardware & Equipment |
| GICS Industry | Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components | Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Electronic Manufacturing Services | Electronic Equipment & Instruments |
| Market Capitalization | 26.06 billion USD | 15.16 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | June 30, 1998 | August 15, 1991 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CLS | ZBRA |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -30.98% | 26.64% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 108.72% | 17.52% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 80.82% | -11.21% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CLS | ZBRA |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 80.89% | 47.91% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.16 | 1.64 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -56.47% | -67.78% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.61M | 596.00K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CLS | ZBRA |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.44 | 0.47 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.59 | 0.82 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Celestica (CLS) at 30.23% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Zebra (ZBRA) at 16.46% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CLS.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
30.23%
- Max
- 42.47%
- CLS
- 30.23%
- Q3
- 19.13%
- Median
- 11.00%
- Q1
- 1.63%
- Min
- -20.62%
ZBRA
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
16.46%
- Max
- 42.47%
- Q3
- 19.13%
- ZBRA
- 16.46%
- Median
- 11.00%
- Q1
- 1.63%
- Min
- -20.62%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Celestica (CLS) at 6.83% and Zebra (ZBRA) at 9.80% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
6.83%
- Max
- 27.60%
- Q3
- 11.66%
- CLS
- 6.83%
- Median
- 4.08%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -11.02%
ZBRA
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
9.80%
- Max
- 27.60%
- Q3
- 11.66%
- ZBRA
- 9.80%
- Median
- 4.08%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -11.02%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Celestica (CLS) at 7.91% and Zebra (ZBRA) at 14.75% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
7.91%
- Max
- 36.27%
- Q3
- 18.36%
- Median
- 8.84%
- CLS
- 7.91%
- Q1
- 1.46%
- Min
- -21.39%
ZBRA
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
14.75%
- Max
- 36.27%
- Q3
- 18.36%
- ZBRA
- 14.75%
- Median
- 8.84%
- Q1
- 1.46%
- Min
- -21.39%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CLS | ZBRA |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 30.23% | 16.46% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.72% | 7.51% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 6.83% | 9.80% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 7.91% | 14.75% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 11.46% | 48.90% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Celestica (CLS) at 28.46% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Zebra (ZBRA) at 8.33% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for CLS.
EPS Growth
Celestica (CLS) at 98.34% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Zebra (ZBRA) at -19.65% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for CLS.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CLS | ZBRA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 28.46% | 8.33% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 19.56% | -2.27% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 98.34% | -19.65% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 82.39% | -2.41% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Celestica (CLS) at 1.61 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Zebra (ZBRA) at 0.57 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for ZBRA.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
1.61
- Max
- 5.34
- Q3
- 3.02
- Median
- 1.95
- CLS
- 1.61
- Q1
- 1.32
- Min
- 0.17
ZBRA
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.57
- Max
- 5.34
- Q3
- 3.02
- Median
- 1.95
- Q1
- 1.32
- ZBRA
- 0.57
- Min
- 0.17
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Celestica (CLS) at 0.17 and Zebra (ZBRA) at 0.78 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.17
- Max
- 1.76
- Q3
- 0.78
- Median
- 0.24
- CLS
- 0.17
- Q1
- 0.04
- Min
- 0.01
ZBRA
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.78
- Max
- 1.76
- ZBRA
- 0.78
- Q3
- 0.78
- Median
- 0.24
- Q1
- 0.04
- Min
- 0.01
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CLS | ZBRA |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.61 | 0.57 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.17 | 0.78 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -1.72 | 2.09 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Neither Celestica (CLS) nor Zebra (ZBRA) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 0.73%
- Q3
- 0.31%
- CLS
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ZBRA
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 0.73%
- Q3
- 0.31%
- ZBRA
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Neither Celestica (CLS) nor Zebra (ZBRA) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 32.27%
- Q3
- 14.48%
- CLS
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ZBRA
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 32.27%
- Q3
- 14.48%
- ZBRA
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CLS | ZBRA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Celestica (CLS) at 19.50 and Zebra (ZBRA) at 26.03 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
19.50
- Max
- 69.48
- Q3
- 41.02
- Median
- 26.39
- CLS
- 19.50
- Q1
- 19.36
- Min
- 6.07
ZBRA
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
26.03
- Max
- 69.48
- Q3
- 41.02
- Median
- 26.39
- ZBRA
- 26.03
- Q1
- 19.36
- Min
- 6.07
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Celestica (CLS) at 1.43 and Zebra (ZBRA) at 2.47 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
1.43
- Max
- 11.30
- Q3
- 5.82
- Median
- 2.56
- CLS
- 1.43
- Q1
- 1.05
- Min
- 0.00
ZBRA
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
2.47
- Max
- 11.30
- Q3
- 5.82
- Median
- 2.56
- ZBRA
- 2.47
- Q1
- 1.05
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Celestica (CLS) at 4.19 and Zebra (ZBRA) at 4.26 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
4.19
- Max
- 10.75
- Q3
- 5.52
- CLS
- 4.19
- Median
- 3.17
- Q1
- 1.79
- Min
- 0.33
ZBRA
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
4.26
- Max
- 10.75
- Q3
- 5.52
- ZBRA
- 4.26
- Median
- 3.17
- Q1
- 1.79
- Min
- 0.33
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CLS | ZBRA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 19.50 | 26.03 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.43 | 2.47 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 4.19 | 4.26 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.08% | 4.61% |