CLS vs. P: Celestica vs. Everpure Stock Comparison
How do Celestica (CLS) and Everpure (P) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Celestica (CLS) and Everpure (P) both fall under the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group, but CLS is classified in Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components while P is classified in Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals.
| Profile Item | CLS | P |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Celestica Inc. | Everpure Inc. Class A Common Stock |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Information Technology | Information Technology |
| GICS Industry Group | Technology Hardware & Equipment | Technology Hardware & Equipment |
| GICS Industry | Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components | Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Electronic Manufacturing Services | Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals |
| Market Capitalization | 26.06 billion USD | 32.24 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | June 30, 1998 | October 6, 2015 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CLS | P |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -30.98% | 15.92% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 108.72% | 43.41% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 80.82% | 29.33% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CLS | P |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 80.89% | 74.05% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.16 | 1.50 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -56.47% | -48.63% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.61M | 4.91M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CLS | P |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.44 | 0.16 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.59 | 0.21 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Celestica (CLS) at 30.23% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Everpure (P) at 17.71% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CLS.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
30.23%
- Max
- 42.47%
- CLS
- 30.23%
- Q3
- 19.13%
- Median
- 11.00%
- Q1
- 1.63%
- Min
- -20.62%
P
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
17.71%
- Max
- 42.47%
- Q3
- 19.13%
- P
- 17.71%
- Median
- 11.00%
- Q1
- 1.63%
- Min
- -20.62%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Celestica (CLS) at 6.83% and Everpure (P) at 5.94% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
6.83%
- Max
- 27.60%
- Q3
- 11.66%
- CLS
- 6.83%
- Median
- 4.08%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -11.02%
P
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
5.94%
- Max
- 27.60%
- Q3
- 11.66%
- P
- 5.94%
- Median
- 4.08%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -11.02%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Celestica (CLS) at 7.91% and Everpure (P) at 5.33% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
7.91%
- Max
- 36.27%
- Q3
- 18.36%
- Median
- 8.84%
- CLS
- 7.91%
- Q1
- 1.46%
- Min
- -21.39%
P
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
5.33%
- Max
- 36.27%
- Q3
- 18.36%
- Median
- 8.84%
- P
- 5.33%
- Q1
- 1.46%
- Min
- -21.39%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CLS | P |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 30.23% | 17.71% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.72% | 3.03% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 6.83% | 5.94% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 7.91% | 5.33% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 11.46% | 69.73% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Celestica (CLS) at 28.46% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Everpure (P) at 15.61% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for CLS.
EPS Growth
Both Celestica (CLS) at 98.34% and Everpure (P) at 77.42% sit in the top peer quartile for EPS growth, so each is compounding per-share earnings faster than typical industry peers.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CLS | P |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 28.46% | 15.61% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 19.56% | 9.98% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 98.34% | 77.42% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 82.39% | 33.72% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Celestica (CLS) at 1.61 and Everpure (P) at 1.51 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
1.61
- Max
- 5.34
- Q3
- 3.02
- Median
- 1.95
- CLS
- 1.61
- Q1
- 1.32
- Min
- 0.17
P
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
1.51
- Max
- 5.34
- Q3
- 3.02
- Median
- 1.95
- P
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.32
- Min
- 0.17
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Celestica (CLS) at 0.17 and Everpure (P) at 0.15 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.17
- Max
- 1.76
- Q3
- 0.78
- Median
- 0.24
- CLS
- 0.17
- Q1
- 0.04
- Min
- 0.01
P
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.15
- Max
- 1.76
- Q3
- 0.78
- Median
- 0.24
- P
- 0.15
- Q1
- 0.04
- Min
- 0.01
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CLS | P |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.61 | 1.51 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.17 | 0.15 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -1.72 | -2.04 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Neither Celestica (CLS) nor Everpure (P) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 0.73%
- Q3
- 0.31%
- CLS
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
P
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 0.73%
- Q3
- 0.31%
- P
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Neither Celestica (CLS) nor Everpure (P) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 32.27%
- Q3
- 14.48%
- CLS
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
P
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 32.27%
- Q3
- 14.48%
- P
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CLS | P |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Celestica (CLS) at 19.50 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Everpure (P) at 132.53 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for P’s trailing earnings.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
19.50
- Max
- 69.48
- Q3
- 41.02
- Median
- 26.39
- CLS
- 19.50
- Q1
- 19.36
- Min
- 6.07
P
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
132.53
- P
- 132.53
- Max
- 69.48
- Q3
- 41.02
- Median
- 26.39
- Q1
- 19.36
- Min
- 6.07
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Celestica (CLS) at 1.43 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Everpure (P) at 7.56 sits in the pricier quartile — P costs more per dollar of sales.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
1.43
- Max
- 11.30
- Q3
- 5.82
- Median
- 2.56
- CLS
- 1.43
- Q1
- 1.05
- Min
- 0.00
P
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
7.56
- Max
- 11.30
- P
- 7.56
- Q3
- 5.82
- Median
- 2.56
- Q1
- 1.05
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Celestica (CLS) at 4.19 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Everpure (P) at 20.93 prices above its benchmark range — P looks rich relative to book.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
4.19
- Max
- 10.75
- Q3
- 5.52
- CLS
- 4.19
- Median
- 3.17
- Q1
- 1.79
- Min
- 0.33
P
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
20.93
- P
- 20.93
- Max
- 10.75
- Q3
- 5.52
- Median
- 3.17
- Q1
- 1.79
- Min
- 0.33
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CLS | P |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 19.50 | 132.53 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.43 | 7.56 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 4.19 | 20.93 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.08% | -0.35% |