Seek Returns

CLS vs. HPQ: Celestica vs. HP Stock Comparison

How do Celestica (CLS) and HP (HPQ) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Celestica (CLS) and HP (HPQ) both fall under the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group, but CLS is classified in Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components while HPQ is classified in Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals.

Company profile comparison for Celestica (CLS) and HP (HPQ)
Profile ItemCLSHPQ
NameCelestica Inc.HP Inc.
Country/RegionCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS Industry GroupTechnology Hardware & EquipmentTechnology Hardware & Equipment
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals
GICS Sub-IndustryElectronic Manufacturing ServicesTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals
Market Capitalization26.06 billion USD25.66 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 30, 1998January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CLS
HPQ
GSPC
Loading price history…
Celestica (CLS) vs. HP (HPQ), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Celestica (CLS) and HP (HPQ). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Celestica (CLS) and HP (HPQ). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Celestica (CLS) and HP (HPQ)
MetricCLSHPQ
Total Return (1Y)-30.98%15.35%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)108.72%6.50%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)80.82%1.86%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CLS
HPQ
GSPC
Loading price history…
Celestica (CLS) vs. HP (HPQ), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Celestica (CLS) and HP (HPQ). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Celestica (CLS) carries a highly aggressive beta of 2.16, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas HP (HPQ) is closer to market-like at 1.18 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Risk profile metrics for Celestica (CLS) and HP (HPQ)
MetricCLSHPQ
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)80.89%47.36%
Beta (5Y)2.161.18
Max Drawdown (5Y)-56.47%-51.23%
Avg. Volume (3M)2.61M14.43M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
CLS and HPQ are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Celestica (CLS) and HP (HPQ)
MetricCLSHPQ
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.440.23
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.590.38

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Celestica (CLS) earns 30.23% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; HP (HPQ) has no ROE this period.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

30.23%

Max
42.47%
CLS
30.23%
Q3
19.13%
Median
11.00%
Q1
1.63%
Min
-20.62%

HPQ

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

--

Max
42.47%
Q3
19.13%
Median
11.00%
Q1
1.63%
Min
-20.62%
HPQ
--
Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. HP (HPQ): HPQ does not report ROE, so it has no value marker; CLS is benchmarked against the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Celestica (CLS) at 6.83% and HP (HPQ) at 4.14% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

6.83%

Max
27.60%
Q3
11.66%
CLS
6.83%
Median
4.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
-11.02%

HPQ

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

4.14%

Max
27.60%
Q3
11.66%
HPQ
4.14%
Median
4.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
-11.02%
Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. HP (HPQ): A comparison of their net margin against the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Celestica (CLS) at 7.91% and HP (HPQ) at 5.40% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

7.91%

Max
36.27%
Q3
18.36%
Median
8.84%
CLS
7.91%
Q1
1.46%
Min
-21.39%

HPQ

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

5.40%

Max
36.27%
Q3
18.36%
Median
8.84%
HPQ
5.40%
Q1
1.46%
Min
-21.39%
Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. HP (HPQ): A comparison of their operating margin against the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Celestica (CLS) and HP (HPQ)
MetricCLSHPQ
ROE (TTM)30.23%--
ROA (TTM)8.72%5.63%
Net Margin (TTM)6.83%4.14%
Operating Margin (TTM)7.91%5.40%
Gross Margin (TTM)11.46%19.66%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Celestica (CLS) at 28.46% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while HP (HPQ) at 3.24% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.

Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. HP (HPQ): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Celestica (CLS) at 98.34% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while HP (HPQ) at -5.69% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for CLS.

Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. HP (HPQ): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Celestica (CLS) and HP (HPQ)
MetricCLSHPQ
Revenue Growth (YoY)28.46%3.24%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)19.56%-4.21%
EPS Growth (YoY)98.34%-5.69%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)82.39%-4.58%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Celestica (CLS) at 1.61 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while HP (HPQ) at 0.79 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for HPQ.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

1.61

Max
5.34
Q3
3.02
Median
1.95
CLS
1.61
Q1
1.32
Min
0.17

HPQ

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

0.79

Max
5.34
Q3
3.02
Median
1.95
Q1
1.32
HPQ
0.79
Min
0.17
Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. HP (HPQ): A comparison of their current ratio against the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Celestica (CLS) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 0.17 against its industry range, while HP (HPQ) reports no figure this period.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

0.17

Max
1.76
Q3
0.78
Median
0.24
CLS
0.17
Q1
0.04
Min
0.01

HPQ

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

--

Max
1.76
Q3
0.78
Median
0.24
Q1
0.04
Min
0.01
HPQ
--
Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. HP (HPQ): HPQ does not report debt-to-equity ratio, so it has no value marker; CLS is benchmarked against the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Celestica (CLS) and HP (HPQ)
MetricCLSHPQ
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.610.79
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.17--
Net Debt / EBITDA-1.721.33

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Celestica (CLS) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile HP (HPQ) reports a yield of 4.04%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

0.00%

Max
0.73%
Q3
0.31%
CLS
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HPQ

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

4.04%

HPQ
4.04%
Max
0.73%
Q3
0.31%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. HP (HPQ): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Celestica (CLS) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile HP (HPQ) reports a payout of 45.40%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

0.00%

Max
32.27%
Q3
14.48%
CLS
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HPQ

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

45.40%

HPQ
45.40%
Max
32.27%
Q3
14.48%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. HP (HPQ): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Celestica (CLS) and HP (HPQ)
MetricCLSHPQ
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%4.04%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%45.40%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

HP (HPQ) at 10.86 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Celestica (CLS) at 19.50 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for HPQ, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

19.50

Max
69.48
Q3
41.02
Median
26.39
CLS
19.50
Q1
19.36
Min
6.07

HPQ

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

10.86

Max
69.48
Q3
41.02
Median
26.39
Q1
19.36
HPQ
10.86
Min
6.07
Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. HP (HPQ): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

HP (HPQ) at 0.43 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Celestica (CLS) at 1.43 prices around its industry’s middle — HPQ costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

1.43

Max
11.30
Q3
5.82
Median
2.56
CLS
1.43
Q1
1.05
Min
0.00

HPQ

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

0.43

Max
11.30
Q3
5.82
Median
2.56
Q1
1.05
HPQ
0.43
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. HP (HPQ): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

HP (HPQ) reports a negative P/B ratio of -279.02, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile Celestica (CLS) reports 4.19, ranking against industry peers normally.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

4.19

Max
10.75
Q3
5.52
CLS
4.19
Median
3.17
Q1
1.79
Min
0.33

HPQ

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

-279.02

Max
10.75
Q3
5.52
Median
3.17
Q1
1.79
Min
0.33
HPQ
-279.02
Loading chart…
Celestica (CLS) vs. HP (HPQ): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Celestica (CLS) and HP (HPQ)
MetricCLSHPQ
P/E Ratio (TTM)19.5010.86
P/S Ratio (TTM)1.430.43
P/B Ratio (MRQ)4.19-279.02
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)3.08%13.21%