CLS vs. FN: Celestica vs. Fabrinet Stock Comparison
How do Celestica (CLS) and Fabrinet (FN) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Celestica (CLS) and Fabrinet (FN) are both classified in the Electronic Manufacturing Services sub-industry within the broader Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Profile Item | CLS | FN |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Celestica Inc. | Fabrinet |
| Country/Region | Canada | Cayman Islands |
| GICS Sector | Information Technology | Information Technology |
| GICS Industry Group | Technology Hardware & Equipment | Technology Hardware & Equipment |
| GICS Industry | Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components | Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Electronic Manufacturing Services | Electronic Manufacturing Services |
| Market Capitalization | 26.06 billion USD | 11.68 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | June 30, 1998 | June 25, 2010 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CLS | FN |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -30.98% | -18.88% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 108.72% | 29.70% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 80.82% | 25.04% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CLS | FN |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 80.89% | 81.72% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.16 | 1.33 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -56.47% | -60.75% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.61M | 999.77K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CLS | FN |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.44 | -0.28 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.59 | -0.40 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Celestica (CLS) at 30.23% and Fabrinet (FN) at 21.00% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
30.23%
- Max
- 42.47%
- CLS
- 30.23%
- Q3
- 19.13%
- Median
- 11.00%
- Q1
- 1.63%
- Min
- -20.62%
FN
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
21.00%
- Max
- 42.47%
- FN
- 21.00%
- Q3
- 19.13%
- Median
- 11.00%
- Q1
- 1.63%
- Min
- -20.62%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Celestica (CLS) at 6.83% and Fabrinet (FN) at 9.36% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
6.83%
- Max
- 27.60%
- Q3
- 11.66%
- CLS
- 6.83%
- Median
- 4.08%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -11.02%
FN
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
9.36%
- Max
- 27.60%
- Q3
- 11.66%
- FN
- 9.36%
- Median
- 4.08%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -11.02%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Celestica (CLS) at 7.91% and Fabrinet (FN) at 9.95% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
7.91%
- Max
- 36.27%
- Q3
- 18.36%
- Median
- 8.84%
- CLS
- 7.91%
- Q1
- 1.46%
- Min
- -21.39%
FN
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
9.95%
- Max
- 36.27%
- Q3
- 18.36%
- FN
- 9.95%
- Median
- 8.84%
- Q1
- 1.46%
- Min
- -21.39%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CLS | FN |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 30.23% | 21.00% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.72% | 8.80% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 6.83% | 9.36% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 7.91% | 9.95% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 11.46% | 11.95% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Celestica (CLS) at 28.46% and Fabrinet (FN) at 35.73% sit in the top peer quartile for revenue growth, so each is growing its top line faster than typical industry peers.
EPS Growth
Celestica (CLS) at 98.34% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Fabrinet (FN) at 42.31% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for CLS.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CLS | FN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 28.46% | 35.73% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 19.56% | 20.61% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 98.34% | 42.31% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 82.39% | 24.70% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Celestica (CLS) at 1.61 and Fabrinet (FN) at 2.04 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
1.61
- Max
- 5.34
- Q3
- 3.02
- Median
- 1.95
- CLS
- 1.61
- Q1
- 1.32
- Min
- 0.17
FN
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
2.04
- Max
- 5.34
- Q3
- 3.02
- FN
- 2.04
- Median
- 1.95
- Q1
- 1.32
- Min
- 0.17
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Fabrinet (FN) at 0.03 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Celestica (CLS) at 0.17 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.17
- Max
- 1.76
- Q3
- 0.78
- Median
- 0.24
- CLS
- 0.17
- Q1
- 0.04
- Min
- 0.01
FN
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.03
- Max
- 1.76
- Q3
- 0.78
- Median
- 0.24
- Q1
- 0.04
- FN
- 0.03
- Min
- 0.01
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CLS | FN |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.61 | 2.04 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.17 | 0.03 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -1.72 | -1.15 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Neither Celestica (CLS) nor Fabrinet (FN) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 0.73%
- Q3
- 0.31%
- CLS
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FN
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 0.73%
- Q3
- 0.31%
- FN
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Neither Celestica (CLS) nor Fabrinet (FN) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 32.27%
- Q3
- 14.48%
- CLS
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FN
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 32.27%
- Q3
- 14.48%
- FN
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CLS | FN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Celestica (CLS) at 19.50 and Fabrinet (FN) at 24.69 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
19.50
- Max
- 69.48
- Q3
- 41.02
- Median
- 26.39
- CLS
- 19.50
- Q1
- 19.36
- Min
- 6.07
FN
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
24.69
- Max
- 69.48
- Q3
- 41.02
- Median
- 26.39
- FN
- 24.69
- Q1
- 19.36
- Min
- 6.07
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Celestica (CLS) at 1.43 and Fabrinet (FN) at 2.27 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
1.43
- Max
- 11.30
- Q3
- 5.82
- Median
- 2.56
- CLS
- 1.43
- Q1
- 1.05
- Min
- 0.00
FN
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
2.27
- Max
- 11.30
- Q3
- 5.82
- Median
- 2.56
- FN
- 2.27
- Q1
- 1.05
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Celestica (CLS) at 4.19 and Fabrinet (FN) at 4.66 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
4.19
- Max
- 10.75
- Q3
- 5.52
- CLS
- 4.19
- Median
- 3.17
- Q1
- 1.79
- Min
- 0.33
FN
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
4.66
- Max
- 10.75
- Q3
- 5.52
- FN
- 4.66
- Median
- 3.17
- Q1
- 1.79
- Min
- 0.33
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CLS | FN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 19.50 | 24.69 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.43 | 2.27 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 4.19 | 4.66 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.08% | -2.11% |