CLS vs. FFIV: Celestica vs. F5 Stock Comparison
How do Celestica (CLS) and F5 (FFIV) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Celestica (CLS) and F5 (FFIV) both fall under the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group, but CLS is classified in Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components while FFIV is classified in Communications Equipment.
| Profile Item | CLS | FFIV |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Celestica Inc. | F5, Inc. |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Information Technology | Information Technology |
| GICS Industry Group | Technology Hardware & Equipment | Technology Hardware & Equipment |
| GICS Industry | Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components | Communications Equipment |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Electronic Manufacturing Services | Communications Equipment |
| Market Capitalization | 26.06 billion USD | 17.66 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | June 30, 1998 | June 4, 1999 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CLS | FFIV |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -30.98% | 30.07% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 108.72% | 27.03% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 80.82% | 7.22% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Celestica (CLS) carries a highly aggressive beta of 2.16, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas F5 (FFIV) is closer to market-like at 1.09 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.
| Metric | CLS | FFIV |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 80.89% | 40.81% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.16 | 1.09 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -56.47% | -47.42% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.61M | 692.80K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CLS | FFIV |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.44 | 0.63 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.59 | 0.84 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Celestica (CLS) at 30.23% sits in the top ROE quartile, while F5 (FFIV) at 19.01% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CLS.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
30.23%
- Max
- 42.47%
- CLS
- 30.23%
- Q3
- 19.13%
- Median
- 11.00%
- Q1
- 1.63%
- Min
- -20.62%
FFIV
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
19.01%
- Max
- 42.47%
- Q3
- 19.13%
- FFIV
- 19.01%
- Median
- 11.00%
- Q1
- 1.63%
- Min
- -20.62%
Net Margin (TTM)
F5 (FFIV) at 21.14% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Celestica (CLS) at 6.83%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
6.83%
- Max
- 27.60%
- Q3
- 11.66%
- CLS
- 6.83%
- Median
- 4.08%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -11.02%
FFIV
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
21.14%
- Max
- 27.60%
- FFIV
- 21.14%
- Q3
- 11.66%
- Median
- 4.08%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -11.02%
Operating Margin (TTM)
F5 (FFIV) at 23.99% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Celestica (CLS) at 7.91%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
7.91%
- Max
- 36.27%
- Q3
- 18.36%
- Median
- 8.84%
- CLS
- 7.91%
- Q1
- 1.46%
- Min
- -21.39%
FFIV
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
23.99%
- Max
- 36.27%
- FFIV
- 23.99%
- Q3
- 18.36%
- Median
- 8.84%
- Q1
- 1.46%
- Min
- -21.39%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CLS | FFIV |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 30.23% | 19.01% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.72% | 7.74% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 6.83% | 21.14% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 7.91% | 23.99% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 11.46% | 81.98% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Only one side can be read here: Celestica (CLS) reports revenue growth of 28.46%, ranked against its industry; F5 (FFIV) has no revenue growth figure this period.
EPS Growth
Celestica (CLS) at 98.34% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while F5 (FFIV) at 6.10% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for CLS.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CLS | FFIV |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 28.46% | -- |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 19.56% | -- |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 98.34% | 6.10% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 82.39% | 24.10% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Celestica (CLS) at 1.61 and F5 (FFIV) at 1.73 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
1.61
- Max
- 5.34
- Q3
- 3.02
- Median
- 1.95
- CLS
- 1.61
- Q1
- 1.32
- Min
- 0.17
FFIV
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
1.73
- Max
- 5.34
- Q3
- 3.02
- Median
- 1.95
- FFIV
- 1.73
- Q1
- 1.32
- Min
- 0.17
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Celestica (CLS) at 0.17 and F5 (FFIV) at 0.05 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.17
- Max
- 1.76
- Q3
- 0.78
- Median
- 0.24
- CLS
- 0.17
- Q1
- 0.04
- Min
- 0.01
FFIV
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.05
- Max
- 1.76
- Q3
- 0.78
- Median
- 0.24
- FFIV
- 0.05
- Q1
- 0.04
- Min
- 0.01
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CLS | FFIV |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.61 | 1.73 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.17 | 0.05 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -1.72 | -1.49 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Neither Celestica (CLS) nor F5 (FFIV) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 0.73%
- Q3
- 0.31%
- CLS
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FFIV
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 0.73%
- Q3
- 0.31%
- FFIV
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Neither Celestica (CLS) nor F5 (FFIV) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 32.27%
- Q3
- 14.48%
- CLS
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FFIV
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 32.27%
- Q3
- 14.48%
- FFIV
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CLS | FFIV |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Celestica (CLS) at 19.50 and F5 (FFIV) at 24.83 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
19.50
- Max
- 69.48
- Q3
- 41.02
- Median
- 26.39
- CLS
- 19.50
- Q1
- 19.36
- Min
- 6.07
FFIV
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
24.83
- Max
- 69.48
- Q3
- 41.02
- Median
- 26.39
- FFIV
- 24.83
- Q1
- 19.36
- Min
- 6.07
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Celestica (CLS) at 1.43 and F5 (FFIV) at 5.17 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
1.43
- Max
- 11.30
- Q3
- 5.82
- Median
- 2.56
- CLS
- 1.43
- Q1
- 1.05
- Min
- 0.00
FFIV
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
5.17
- Max
- 11.30
- Q3
- 5.82
- FFIV
- 5.17
- Median
- 2.56
- Q1
- 1.05
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Celestica (CLS) at 4.19 and F5 (FFIV) at 4.41 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
CLS
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
4.19
- Max
- 10.75
- Q3
- 5.52
- CLS
- 4.19
- Median
- 3.17
- Q1
- 1.79
- Min
- 0.33
FFIV
Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group
4.41
- Max
- 10.75
- Q3
- 5.52
- FFIV
- 4.41
- Median
- 3.17
- Q1
- 1.79
- Min
- 0.33
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CLS | FFIV |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 19.50 | 24.83 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.43 | 5.17 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 4.19 | 4.41 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 3.08% | 3.63% |