CLS vs. CRWV: Celestica vs. CoreWeave Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Celestica (CLS) and CoreWeave (CRWV) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Celestica (CLS) and CoreWeave (CRWV) share the Information Technology sector but sit in different industry groups — CLS in Technology Hardware & Equipment and CRWV in Software & Services.

Celestica (CLS) carries decades of public-market history since June 30, 1998, while CoreWeave (CRWV) listed on March 28, 2025 — long-window comparisons have far more historical data on the CLS side.

Company profile comparison for Celestica (CLS) and CoreWeave (CRWV)
Profile Item	CLS	CRWV
Name	Celestica Inc.	CoreWeave Inc. Class A Common Stock
Country/Region	Canada	United States
GICS Sector	Information Technology	Information Technology
GICS Industry Group	Technology Hardware & Equipment	Software & Services
GICS Industry	Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components	IT Services
GICS Sub-Industry	Electronic Manufacturing Services	Internet Services & Infrastructure
Market Capitalization	26.06 billion USD	25.59 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	Nasdaq
Listing Date	June 30, 1998	March 28, 2025
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CLS

CRWV

GSPC

Celestica (CLS) vs. CoreWeave (CRWV), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Celestica (CLS) and CoreWeave (CRWV). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Celestica (CLS) and CoreWeave (CRWV). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Celestica (CLS) and CoreWeave (CRWV)
Metric	CLS	CRWV
Total Return (1Y)	-30.98%	-52.69%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	108.72%	--
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	80.82%	--

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CLS

CRWV

GSPC

Celestica (CLS) vs. CoreWeave (CRWV), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Celestica (CLS) and CoreWeave (CRWV). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Celestica (CLS) and CoreWeave (CRWV)
Metric	CLS	CRWV
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	80.89%	98.61%
Beta (5Y)	2.16	7.43
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-56.47%	-76.22%
Avg. Volume (3M)	2.61M	40.98M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

CLS and CRWV are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. Each dashed Capital Allocation Line uses that stock's own industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Celestica (CLS) and CoreWeave (CRWV)
Metric	CLS	CRWV
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	-0.44	-0.58
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	-0.59	-0.86

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

CoreWeave (CRWV) reports a negative ROE of -43.60%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Celestica (CLS) reports 30.23%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

30.23%

Max: 42.47%
CLS: 30.23%
Q3: 19.13%
Median: 11.00%
Q1: 1.63%
Min: -20.62%

CRWV

Software & Services industry group

-43.60%

Max: 53.85%
Q3: 17.90%
Median: 6.59%
Q1: -9.59%
CRWV: -43.60%
Min: -50.52%

Celestica (CLS) vs. CoreWeave (CRWV): A comparison of their ROE against their respective Technology Hardware & Equipment and Software & Services industry group benchmarks.

Net Margin (TTM)

CoreWeave (CRWV) reports a negative net margin of -25.40%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Celestica (CLS) reports 6.83%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

6.83%

Max: 27.60%
Q3: 11.66%
CLS: 6.83%
Median: 4.08%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -11.02%

CRWV

Software & Services industry group

-25.40%

Max: 41.17%
Q3: 15.28%
Median: 4.63%
Q1: -5.42%
CRWV: -25.40%
Min: -33.17%

Celestica (CLS) vs. CoreWeave (CRWV): A comparison of their net margin against their respective Technology Hardware & Equipment and Software & Services industry group benchmarks.

Operating Margin (TTM)

CoreWeave (CRWV) reports a negative operating margin of -1.90%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Celestica (CLS) reports 7.91%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

7.91%

Max: 36.27%
Q3: 18.36%
Median: 8.84%
CLS: 7.91%
Q1: 1.46%
Min: -21.39%

CRWV

Software & Services industry group

-1.90%

Max: 46.89%
Q3: 17.64%
Median: 8.73%
CRWV: -1.90%
Q1: -2.13%
Min: -30.45%

Celestica (CLS) vs. CoreWeave (CRWV): A comparison of their operating margin against their respective Technology Hardware & Equipment and Software & Services industry group benchmarks.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Celestica (CLS) and CoreWeave (CRWV)
Metric	CLS	CRWV
ROE (TTM)	30.23%	-43.60%
ROA (TTM)	8.72%	-0.24%
Net Margin (TTM)	6.83%	-25.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)	7.91%	-1.90%
Gross Margin (TTM)	11.46%	67.42%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both companies are growing quickly, but CoreWeave (CRWV) at 167.94% is the standout with revenue growth above its industry range; Celestica (CLS) at 28.46% also sits in the top quartile.

Celestica (CLS) vs. CoreWeave (CRWV): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Only one side can be read here: Celestica (CLS) reports EPS growth of 98.34%, ranked against its industry; CoreWeave (CRWV) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Celestica (CLS) vs. CoreWeave (CRWV): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Celestica (CLS) and CoreWeave (CRWV)
Metric	CLS	CRWV
Revenue Growth (YoY)	28.46%	167.94%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	19.56%	586.92%
EPS Growth (YoY)	98.34%	--
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	82.39%	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Celestica (CLS) at 1.61 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while CoreWeave (CRWV) at 0.46 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for CRWV.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

1.61

Max: 5.34
Q3: 3.02
Median: 1.95
CLS: 1.61
Q1: 1.32
Min: 0.17

CRWV

Software & Services industry group

0.46

Max: 5.11
Q3: 2.77
Median: 1.67
Q1: 1.01
CRWV: 0.46
Min: 0.03

Celestica (CLS) vs. CoreWeave (CRWV): A comparison of their current ratio against their respective Technology Hardware & Equipment and Software & Services industry group benchmarks.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Celestica (CLS) at 0.17 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while CoreWeave (CRWV) at 10.27 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

0.17

Max: 1.76
Q3: 0.78
Median: 0.24
CLS: 0.17
Q1: 0.04
Min: 0.01

CRWV

Software & Services industry group

10.27

CRWV: 10.27
Max: 2.52
Q3: 1.13
Median: 0.40
Q1: 0.07
Min: 0.00

Celestica (CLS) vs. CoreWeave (CRWV): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against their respective Technology Hardware & Equipment and Software & Services industry group benchmarks.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Celestica (CLS) and CoreWeave (CRWV)
Metric	CLS	CRWV
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.61	0.46
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	0.17	10.27
Net Debt / EBITDA	-1.72	12.16

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Neither Celestica (CLS) nor CoreWeave (CRWV) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

0.00%

Max: 0.73%
Q3: 0.31%
CLS: 0.00%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CRWV

Software & Services industry group

0.00%

CRWV: 0.00%
Max: 0.00%
Q3: 0.00%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Celestica (CLS) vs. CoreWeave (CRWV): A comparison of their dividend yield against their respective Technology Hardware & Equipment and Software & Services industry group benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Neither Celestica (CLS) nor CoreWeave (CRWV) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

0.00%

Max: 32.27%
Q3: 14.48%
CLS: 0.00%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

CRWV

Software & Services industry group

0.00%

CRWV: 0.00%
Max: 0.00%
Q3: 0.00%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Celestica (CLS) vs. CoreWeave (CRWV): A comparison of their payout ratio against their respective Technology Hardware & Equipment and Software & Services industry group benchmarks.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Celestica (CLS) and CoreWeave (CRWV)
Metric	CLS	CRWV
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	0.00%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Celestica (CLS) trades at 19.50 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while CoreWeave (CRWV) has no P/E ratio this period.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

19.50

Max: 69.48
Q3: 41.02
Median: 26.39
CLS: 19.50
Q1: 19.36
Min: 6.07

CRWV

Software & Services industry group

Max: 112.94
Q3: 60.32
Median: 32.91
Q1: 18.77
Min: 6.69
CRWV: --

Celestica (CLS) vs. CoreWeave (CRWV): CRWV does not report P/E ratio, so it has no value marker; CLS is benchmarked against the Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both Celestica (CLS) at 1.43 and CoreWeave (CRWV) at 3.37 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

1.43

Max: 11.30
Q3: 5.82
Median: 2.56
CLS: 1.43
Q1: 1.05
Min: 0.00

CRWV

Software & Services industry group

3.37

Max: 17.91
Q3: 8.78
Median: 4.25
CRWV: 3.37
Q1: 2.23
Min: 0.02

Celestica (CLS) vs. CoreWeave (CRWV): A comparison of their P/S ratio against their respective Technology Hardware & Equipment and Software & Services industry group benchmarks.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both Celestica (CLS) at 4.19 and CoreWeave (CRWV) at 5.09 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

CLS

Technology Hardware & Equipment industry group

4.19

Max: 10.75
Q3: 5.52
CLS: 4.19
Median: 3.17
Q1: 1.79
Min: 0.33

CRWV

Software & Services industry group

5.09

Max: 16.63
Q3: 8.50
CRWV: 5.09
Median: 4.30
Q1: 1.92
Min: -3.90

Celestica (CLS) vs. CoreWeave (CRWV): A comparison of their P/B ratio against their respective Technology Hardware & Equipment and Software & Services industry group benchmarks.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Celestica (CLS) and CoreWeave (CRWV)
Metric	CLS	CRWV
P/E Ratio (TTM)	19.50	--
P/S Ratio (TTM)	1.43	3.37
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	4.19	5.09
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	3.08%	-35.51%