Seek Returns logo

CL vs. MDLZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CL and MDLZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCLMDLZ
Company NameColgate-Palmolive CompanyMondelez International, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryHousehold ProductsFood Products
Market Capitalization69.78 billion USD80.47 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 2, 1973June 13, 2001
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CL and MDLZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CL vs. MDLZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCLMDLZ
5-Day Price Return1.92%-0.34%
13-Week Price Return-3.14%-5.53%
26-Week Price Return0.77%7.54%
52-Week Price Return-14.75%-10.23%
Month-to-Date Return2.97%-3.86%
Year-to-Date Return-5.03%4.12%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.71M8.87M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.30M7.87M
3-Month Volatility17.38%22.56%
Beta0.350.46

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CL

679.67%

Household Products Industry

Max
226.04%
Q3
106.83%
Median
17.55%
Q1
9.51%
Min
-8.31%

CL’s Return on Equity of 679.67% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MDLZ

13.64%

Food Products Industry

Max
27.15%
Q3
15.66%
Median
10.47%
Q1
7.82%
Min
-2.46%

MDLZ’s Return on Equity of 13.64% is on par with the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CL vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CL

14.55%

Household Products Industry

Max
12.48%
Q3
10.54%
Median
9.15%
Q1
8.81%
Min
8.58%

CL’s Net Profit Margin of 14.55% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Products industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

MDLZ

9.81%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
9.92%
Median
6.38%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-0.92%

MDLZ’s Net Profit Margin of 9.81% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Food Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CL vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CL

21.17%

Household Products Industry

Max
21.54%
Q3
16.06%
Median
13.28%
Q1
12.03%
Min
6.49%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.17% places CL in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MDLZ

12.44%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.27%
Median
9.73%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.10%

MDLZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.44% is around the midpoint for the Food Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CL vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCLMDLZ
Return on Equity (TTM)679.67%13.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)17.38%5.19%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.55%9.81%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.17%12.44%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)60.57%32.55%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CL

0.89

Household Products Industry

Max
3.31
Q3
2.04
Median
1.21
Q1
0.76
Min
0.55

CL’s Current Ratio of 0.89 aligns with the median group of the Household Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MDLZ

0.64

Food Products Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.40
Median
1.61
Q1
1.28
Min
0.55

MDLZ’s Current Ratio of 0.64 falls into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CL vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CL

12.48

Household Products Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
1.47
Median
0.49
Q1
0.16
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 12.48, CL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Household Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

MDLZ

0.80

Food Products Industry

Max
1.87
Q3
0.90
Median
0.48
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

MDLZ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.80 is typical for the Food Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CL vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CL

20.49

Household Products Industry

Max
83.52
Q3
68.49
Median
13.94
Q1
9.41
Min
4.76

CL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.49 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MDLZ

13.32

Food Products Industry

Max
70.39
Q3
32.08
Median
9.51
Q1
4.55
Min
-1.69

MDLZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.32 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CL vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCLMDLZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.890.64
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.570.39
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)12.480.80
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)20.4913.32

Growth

Revenue Growth

CL vs. MDLZ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CL vs. MDLZ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CL

2.57%

Household Products Industry

Max
5.40%
Q3
3.85%
Median
2.82%
Q1
1.83%
Min
0.00%

CL’s Dividend Yield of 2.57% is consistent with its peers in the Household Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MDLZ

3.06%

Food Products Industry

Max
7.43%
Q3
4.12%
Median
2.67%
Q1
1.57%
Min
0.00%

MDLZ’s Dividend Yield of 3.06% is consistent with its peers in the Food Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CL vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CL

61.95%

Household Products Industry

Max
191.34%
Q3
102.63%
Median
70.63%
Q1
34.62%
Min
0.00%

CL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 61.95% is within the typical range for the Household Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MDLZ

66.77%

Food Products Industry

Max
202.50%
Q3
109.53%
Median
67.28%
Q1
39.33%
Min
0.00%

MDLZ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 66.77% is within the typical range for the Food Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CL vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCLMDLZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.57%3.06%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)61.95%66.77%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CL

24.08

Household Products Industry

Max
33.84
Q3
22.61
Median
18.73
Q1
14.08
Min
13.61

A P/E Ratio of 24.08 places CL in the upper quartile for the Household Products industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MDLZ

21.82

Food Products Industry

Max
35.81
Q3
22.88
Median
17.13
Q1
13.91
Min
2.77

MDLZ’s P/E Ratio of 21.82 is within the middle range for the Food Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CL vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CL

3.50

Household Products Industry

Max
4.78
Q3
2.70
Median
1.93
Q1
1.27
Min
0.73

CL’s P/S Ratio of 3.50 is in the upper echelon for the Household Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MDLZ

2.14

Food Products Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
1.86
Median
1.14
Q1
0.68
Min
0.12

MDLZ’s P/S Ratio of 2.14 is in the upper echelon for the Food Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CL vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CL

104.94

Household Products Industry

Max
14.28
Q3
14.28
Median
4.13
Q1
1.75
Min
1.42

At 104.94, CL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MDLZ

3.33

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.76
Median
1.98
Q1
1.26
Min
0.52

MDLZ’s P/B Ratio of 3.33 is in the upper tier for the Food Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CL vs. MDLZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Products and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCLMDLZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.0821.82
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.502.14
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)104.943.33
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.7927.77