Seek Returns logo

CIEN vs. HPE: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CIEN and HPE, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCIENHPE
Company NameCiena CorporationHewlett Packard Enterprise Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryCommunications EquipmentTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals
Market Capitalization13.38 billion USD28.29 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 7, 1997October 19, 2015
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CIEN and HPE by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CIEN vs. HPE: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCIENHPE
5-Day Price Return-0.55%5.69%
13-Week Price Return19.81%21.53%
26-Week Price Return1.65%0.94%
52-Week Price Return95.18%25.42%
Month-to-Date Return1.96%4.20%
Year-to-Date Return11.61%0.98%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.61M15.23M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.05M18.94M
3-Month Volatility40.51%34.54%
Beta1.071.45

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CIEN

3.72%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.05%
Q3
19.58%
Median
11.77%
Q1
2.23%
Min
-11.93%

CIEN’s Return on Equity of 3.72% is on par with the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

HPE

6.06%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
29.40%
Median
9.11%
Q1
6.06%
Min
-0.79%

HPE’s Return on Equity of 6.06% is on par with the norm for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CIEN vs. HPE: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CIEN

2.46%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
14.32%
Median
5.31%
Q1
1.45%
Min
-12.72%

CIEN’s Net Profit Margin of 2.46% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HPE

4.60%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.86%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.62%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.21%

HPE’s Net Profit Margin of 4.60% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CIEN vs. HPE: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CIEN

4.66%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
18.90%
Median
6.21%
Q1
2.97%
Min
-20.72%

CIEN’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.66% is around the midpoint for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HPE

4.86%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
17.80%
Q3
10.33%
Median
6.31%
Q1
4.86%
Min
2.53%

HPE’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.86% is around the midpoint for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CIEN vs. HPE: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCIENHPE
Return on Equity (TTM)3.72%6.06%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.87%2.15%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.46%4.60%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.66%4.86%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)41.94%30.05%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CIEN

3.40

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
1.72
Median
1.46
Q1
1.18
Min
0.93

CIEN’s Current Ratio of 3.40 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

HPE

1.29

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
2.47
Q3
1.98
Median
1.40
Q1
1.26
Min
0.70

HPE’s Current Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the median group of the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CIEN vs. HPE: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CIEN

0.55

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.55
Q3
0.92
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

CIEN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.55 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

HPE

0.73

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
0.93
Median
0.32
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

HPE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.73 is typical for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CIEN vs. HPE: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

3.65

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
181.73
Q3
113.63
Median
7.59
Q1
3.82
Min
-5.39

In the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, CIEN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.65 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

HPE

116.71

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
204.63
Q3
90.22
Median
21.70
Q1
6.79
Min
-23.93

HPE’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 116.71 is in the upper quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

CIEN vs. HPE: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCIENHPE
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.401.29
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.270.96
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.550.73
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.65116.71

Growth

Revenue Growth

CIEN vs. HPE: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CIEN vs. HPE: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CIEN

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.88%
Q3
2.75%
Median
0.93%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CIEN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HPE

2.61%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.50%
Q3
3.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HPE’s Dividend Yield of 2.61% is consistent with its peers in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CIEN vs. HPE: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
55.91%
Median
28.42%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CIEN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HPE

24.94%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
142.87%
Q3
66.07%
Median
42.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HPE’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 24.94% is within the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CIEN vs. HPE: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCIENHPE
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.61%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%24.94%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

131.48

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
57.30
Q3
47.92
Median
27.50
Q1
17.89
Min
13.89

At 131.48, CIEN’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

HPE

19.30

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.16
Q3
27.56
Median
17.85
Q1
12.48
Min
6.21

HPE’s P/E Ratio of 19.30 is within the middle range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CIEN vs. HPE: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CIEN

3.23

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
11.03
Q3
5.53
Median
2.20
Q1
0.99
Min
0.40

CIEN’s P/S Ratio of 3.23 aligns with the market consensus for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

HPE

0.89

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.27
Q3
1.99
Median
0.93
Q1
0.45
Min
0.04

HPE’s P/S Ratio of 0.89 aligns with the market consensus for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CIEN vs. HPE: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CIEN

3.73

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
9.66
Q3
5.60
Median
3.73
Q1
2.67
Min
0.30

CIEN’s P/B Ratio of 3.73 is within the conventional range for the Communications Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

HPE

0.89

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
12.51
Q3
6.11
Median
1.73
Q1
1.01
Min
0.31

HPE’s P/B Ratio of 0.89 is in the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

CIEN vs. HPE: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCIENHPE
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)131.4819.30
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.230.89
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.730.89
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)29.2610.94