Seek Returns logo

AAPL vs. CIEN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AAPL and CIEN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAAPLCIEN
Company NameApple Inc.Ciena Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryTechnology Hardware, Storage & PeripheralsCommunications Equipment
Market Capitalization3,354.08 billion USD12.25 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateDecember 12, 1980February 7, 1997
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AAPL and CIEN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AAPL vs. CIEN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAAPLCIEN
5-Day Price Return-2.91%-5.23%
13-Week Price Return8.25%6.98%
26-Week Price Return-6.43%-2.49%
52-Week Price Return0.05%60.62%
Month-to-Date Return8.88%-6.68%
Year-to-Date Return-9.75%2.16%
10-Day Avg. Volume61.85M1.63M
3-Month Avg. Volume56.06M1.96M
3-Month Volatility23.04%40.43%
Beta1.081.07

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AAPL

154.92%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
29.40%
Median
9.11%
Q1
6.06%
Min
-0.79%

AAPL’s Return on Equity of 154.92% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CIEN

3.72%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.05%
Q3
19.58%
Median
11.77%
Q1
2.23%
Min
-11.93%

CIEN’s Return on Equity of 3.72% is on par with the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

AAPL vs. CIEN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AAPL

24.30%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.86%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.62%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.21%

AAPL’s Net Profit Margin of 24.30% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CIEN

2.46%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
14.32%
Median
5.31%
Q1
1.45%
Min
-12.72%

CIEN’s Net Profit Margin of 2.46% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AAPL vs. CIEN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AAPL

31.87%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
17.80%
Q3
10.33%
Median
6.31%
Q1
4.86%
Min
2.53%

AAPL’s Operating Profit Margin of 31.87% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

CIEN

4.67%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
18.90%
Median
6.21%
Q1
2.97%
Min
-20.72%

CIEN’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.67% is around the midpoint for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AAPL vs. CIEN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAAPLCIEN
Return on Equity (TTM)154.92%3.72%
Return on Assets (TTM)28.95%1.87%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)24.30%2.46%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)31.87%4.67%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)46.68%41.94%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AAPL

0.87

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
2.47
Q3
1.98
Median
1.40
Q1
1.26
Min
0.70

AAPL’s Current Ratio of 0.87 falls into the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CIEN

3.40

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
1.72
Median
1.46
Q1
1.18
Min
0.93

CIEN’s Current Ratio of 3.40 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

AAPL vs. CIEN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AAPL

1.54

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
0.93
Median
0.32
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.54, AAPL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CIEN

0.55

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.55
Q3
0.92
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

CIEN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.55 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

AAPL vs. CIEN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AAPL

622.51

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
204.63
Q3
90.22
Median
21.70
Q1
6.79
Min
-23.93

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 622.51, AAPL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CIEN

3.66

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
181.73
Q3
113.63
Median
7.59
Q1
3.82
Min
-5.39

In the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, CIEN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.66 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

AAPL vs. CIEN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAAPLCIEN
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.873.40
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.832.27
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.540.55
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)622.513.66

Growth

Revenue Growth

AAPL vs. CIEN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AAPL vs. CIEN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AAPL

0.46%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.50%
Q3
3.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AAPL’s Dividend Yield of 0.46% is consistent with its peers in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CIEN

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.88%
Q3
2.75%
Median
0.93%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CIEN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

AAPL vs. CIEN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AAPL

15.47%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
142.87%
Q3
66.07%
Median
42.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

AAPL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 15.47% is within the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CIEN

0.00%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
55.91%
Median
28.42%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CIEN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

AAPL vs. CIEN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAAPLCIEN
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.46%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)15.47%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AAPL

33.94

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.16
Q3
27.56
Median
17.85
Q1
12.48
Min
6.21

A P/E Ratio of 33.94 places AAPL in the upper quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CIEN

118.08

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
57.30
Q3
47.92
Median
27.50
Q1
17.89
Min
13.89

At 118.08, CIEN’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

AAPL vs. CIEN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AAPL

8.25

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.27
Q3
1.99
Median
0.93
Q1
0.45
Min
0.04

With a P/S Ratio of 8.25, AAPL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CIEN

2.91

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
11.03
Q3
5.53
Median
2.20
Q1
0.99
Min
0.40

CIEN’s P/S Ratio of 2.91 aligns with the market consensus for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

AAPL vs. CIEN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AAPL

46.55

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
12.51
Q3
6.11
Median
1.73
Q1
1.01
Min
0.31

At 46.55, AAPL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CIEN

3.73

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
9.66
Q3
5.60
Median
3.73
Q1
2.67
Min
0.30

CIEN’s P/B Ratio of 3.73 is within the conventional range for the Communications Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

AAPL vs. CIEN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAAPLCIEN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)33.94118.08
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.252.91
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)46.553.73
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)35.0326.32