CHYM vs. KKR: Chime Financial vs. KKR Stock Comparison
How do Chime Financial (CHYM) and KKR (KKR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Chime Financial (CHYM) and KKR (KKR) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but CHYM is classified in Financial Services while KKR is classified in Capital Markets.
KKR (KKR) has been public since July 15, 2010, giving it a longer listed trading history, while Chime Financial (CHYM) listed on June 12, 2025 and still has a shorter public-market record.
| Profile Item | CHYM | KKR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Chime Financial Inc. Class A | Korro Bio, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| GICS Industry | Financial Services | Capital Markets |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Transaction & Payment Processing Services | Asset Management & Custody Banks |
| Market Capitalization | 12.02 billion USD | 89.11 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | June 12, 2025 | July 15, 2010 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CHYM | KKR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 63.03% | -18.61% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | -- | 17.09% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -- | 5.12% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
KKR (KKR) has an aggressive beta of 1.69, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Chime Financial (CHYM) is defensive at 0.31 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | CHYM | KKR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 61.33% | 38.71% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.31 | 1.69 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -55.70% | -49.42% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 6.12M | 4.77M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CHYM | KKR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.96 | -0.59 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.48 | -0.81 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Chime Financial (CHYM) at 5.38% and KKR (KKR) at 7.28% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
CHYM
Financial Services industry group
5.38%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- CHYM
- 5.38%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
KKR
Financial Services industry group
7.28%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- KKR
- 7.28%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
Net Margin (TTM)
KKR (KKR) at 12.20% keeps about the industry-typical share of revenue as profit, while Chime Financial (CHYM) at 3.05% retains only a bottom-quartile share.
CHYM
Financial Services industry group
3.05%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- CHYM
- 3.05%
- Min
- -28.52%
KKR
Financial Services industry group
12.20%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- KKR
- 12.20%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Chime Financial (CHYM) at 20.88% and KKR (KKR) at 20.65% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CHYM
Financial Services industry group
20.88%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- Median
- 30.09%
- CHYM
- 20.88%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
KKR
Financial Services industry group
20.65%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- Median
- 30.09%
- KKR
- 20.65%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CHYM | KKR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 5.38% | 7.28% |
| ROA (TTM) | 14.73% | 1.39% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 3.05% | 12.20% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 20.88% | 20.65% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Chime Financial (CHYM) at 30.69% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while KKR (KKR) at -11.24% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: KKR (KKR) reports EPS growth of -28.66%, ranked against its industry; Chime Financial (CHYM) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CHYM | KKR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 30.69% | -11.24% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 29.42% | 51.12% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | -28.66% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Chime Financial (CHYM) in Financial Services and KKR (KKR) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Chime Financial (CHYM) in Financial Services and KKR (KKR) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CHYM | KKR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Chime Financial (CHYM) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile KKR (KKR) reports a yield of 0.77%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CHYM
Financial Services industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- Median
- 1.09%
- CHYM
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
KKR
Financial Services industry group
0.77%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- Median
- 1.09%
- KKR
- 0.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Chime Financial (CHYM) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile KKR (KKR) reports a payout of 23.96%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CHYM
Financial Services industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- CHYM
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
KKR
Financial Services industry group
23.96%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- KKR
- 23.96%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CHYM | KKR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.77% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 23.96% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Chime Financial (CHYM) at 27.48 and KKR (KKR) at 30.82 sit in the richer earnings-multiple quartile for P/E ratio, so investors are paying more for TTM earnings than they pay for typical peers.
CHYM
Financial Services industry group
27.48
- Max
- 45.85
- CHYM
- 27.48
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
KKR
Financial Services industry group
30.82
- Max
- 45.85
- KKR
- 30.82
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Chime Financial (CHYM) at 4.57 and KKR (KKR) at 3.45 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
CHYM
Financial Services industry group
4.57
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- CHYM
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
KKR
Financial Services industry group
3.45
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- KKR
- 3.45
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
KKR (KKR) at 3.04 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Chime Financial (CHYM) at 7.79 carries an above-peer premium to book — CHYM is pricier on assets.
CHYM
Financial Services industry group
7.79
- CHYM
- 7.79
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
KKR
Financial Services industry group
3.04
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- KKR
- 3.04
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CHYM | KKR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 27.48 | 30.82 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 4.57 | 3.45 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 7.79 | 3.04 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |