CHYM vs. ICE: Chime Financial vs. Intercontinental Exchange Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Chime Financial (CHYM) and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but CHYM is classified in Financial Services while ICE is classified in Capital Markets.

Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) carries decades of public-market history since November 16, 2005, while Chime Financial (CHYM) listed on June 12, 2025 — long-window comparisons have far more historical data on the ICE side.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Chime Financial (CHYM) at 5.38% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 14.40% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 38.14% keeps a top-quartile share of each sales dollar as profit, while Chime Financial (CHYM) at 3.05% keeps a bottom-quartile share.

Both Chime Financial (CHYM) at 20.88% and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 52.77% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Chime Financial (CHYM) at 30.69% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 7.47% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for CHYM.

Only one side can be read here: Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) reports EPS growth of 20.71%, ranked against its industry; Chime Financial (CHYM) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Chime Financial (CHYM) in Financial Services and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Chime Financial (CHYM) in Financial Services and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Chime Financial (CHYM) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) reports a yield of 1.17%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Chime Financial (CHYM) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) reports a payout of 27.79%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 23.47 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Chime Financial (CHYM) at 27.48 sits in the richer quartile — CHYM needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

Chime Financial (CHYM) at 4.57 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 8.82 sits in the pricier quartile — ICE costs more per dollar of sales.

Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) at 3.22 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Chime Financial (CHYM) at 7.79 carries an above-peer premium to book — CHYM is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics