CHT vs. SPCX: Chunghwa Telecom vs. Space Exploration Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) and Space Exploration (SPCX) both belong to the Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, though CHT is classified under Integrated Telecommunication Services while SPCX falls under Alternative Carriers.

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) has been public since July 18, 2003, giving it decades of market history across multiple cycles, while Space Exploration (SPCX) listed only on June 12, 2026 and lacks comparable through-cycle data.

Space Exploration (SPCX) trades as ordinary local shares, while Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Space Exploration (SPCX) has a highly aggressive beta of 16.03, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) is defensive at 0.28 and tends to be less market-sensitive — a wide gap in beta profiles.

Space Exploration (SPCX) is heavily traded at around 120.78M shares per day, whereas Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) sees a more moderate 159.19K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both CHT and SPCX need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) earns 10.84% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Space Exploration (SPCX) has no ROE this period.

Space Exploration (SPCX) reports a negative net margin of -35.66%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) reports 16.12%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Space Exploration (SPCX) reports a negative operating margin of -1.80%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) reports 21.61%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Space Exploration (SPCX) at 33.24% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) at 2.70%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) at 3.97% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Space Exploration (SPCX) at -25,600.00% falls below its industry range, a notably weak earnings reading.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) at 1.41 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Space Exploration (SPCX) at 5.12 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

Both Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) at 0.07 and Space Exploration (SPCX) at 0.31 keep leverage in the lower quartile of their industries, with less balance-sheet debt relative to equity than most peers.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Neither Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) nor Space Exploration (SPCX) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Space Exploration (SPCX) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) reports a payout of 96.91%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) trades at 27.26 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Space Exploration (SPCX) has no P/E ratio this period.

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) at 0.13 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Space Exploration (SPCX) at 76.14 prices above its industry range — a wide gap in sales valuation between them.

Measured against book value, both Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) at 11.08 and Space Exploration (SPCX) at 13.79 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.

Valuation Metrics