Seek Returns

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) vs. AT&T (T)

This page compares Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) with AT&T (T) using historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation metrics.

Company Profile

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) and AT&T (T) are both classified in the Integrated Telecommunication Services sub-industry within the broader Diversified Telecommunication Services industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

AT&T (T) trades as a standard ordinary-equity line, while Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) is an ADR tied to a foreign-share or depositary-receipt structure — compare with FX exposure, program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

SymbolCHTT
Company NameChunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.AT&T Inc.
Country/RegionTaiwanUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesCommunication Services
GICS Industry GroupTelecommunication ServicesTelecommunication Services
GICS IndustryDiversified Telecommunication ServicesDiversified Telecommunication Services
GICS Sub-IndustryIntegrated Telecommunication ServicesIntegrated Telecommunication Services
Market Capitalization34.95 billion USD173.57 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 18, 2003November 21, 1983
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) reports a negative beta of -0.00, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. AT&T (T) has a more conventional positive beta of 0.21.

CHT
T
Loading price history…
Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) vs. AT&T (T): Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCHTT
5-Day Price Return3.64%0.97%
13-Week Price Return6.74%-12.90%
26-Week Price Return8.78%-0.79%
52-Week Price Return8.26%-10.85%
Month-to-Date Return4.78%-4.40%
Year-to-Date Return9.20%0.56%
10-Day Avg. Volume15.45M37.41M
3-Month Avg. Volume11.18M42.37M
3-Month Volatility14.11%24.73%
Beta-0.000.21

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AT&T (T) at 19.65% ranks in the top quartile for Return on Equity (TTM), ahead of Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) at 10.15%, which sits closer to the industry mid-range.

CHT

Telecommunication Services industry group

10.15%

Max
44.15%
Q3
17.92%
Median
9.28%
Q1
-8.75%
Min
-48.58%

T

Telecommunication Services industry group

19.65%

Max
44.15%
Q3
17.92%
Median
9.28%
Q1
-8.75%
Min
-48.58%
Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) vs. AT&T (T): A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Telecommunication Services industry group benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

Both Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) at 16.24% and AT&T (T) at 16.94% rank in the top quartile for Net Profit Margin (TTM) among industry peers, indicating both companies convert revenue into net income more strongly than typical competitors.

CHT

Telecommunication Services industry group

16.24%

Max
31.74%
Q3
12.37%
Median
5.80%
Q1
-9.49%
Min
-17.53%

T

Telecommunication Services industry group

16.94%

Max
31.74%
Q3
12.37%
Median
5.80%
Q1
-9.49%
Min
-17.53%
Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) vs. AT&T (T): A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Telecommunication Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

Both Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) at 20.45% and AT&T (T) at 19.81% post Operating Profit Margin (TTM) near their industry mid-ranges, so neither company stands out strongly from peers on operating profitability.

CHT

Telecommunication Services industry group

20.45%

Max
51.92%
Q3
21.92%
Median
10.91%
Q1
0.52%
Min
-8.98%

T

Telecommunication Services industry group

19.81%

Max
51.92%
Q3
21.92%
Median
10.91%
Q1
0.52%
Min
-8.98%
Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) vs. AT&T (T): A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Telecommunication Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCHTT
Return on Equity (TTM)10.15%19.65%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.27%5.13%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.24%16.94%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)20.45%19.81%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.67%59.41%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) at 1.49 and AT&T (T) at 0.92 carry Current Ratio (MRQ) within their industry mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

CHT

Telecommunication Services industry group

1.49

Max
2.14
Q3
1.55
Median
1.09
Q1
0.76
Min
0.25

T

Telecommunication Services industry group

0.92

Max
2.14
Q3
1.55
Median
1.09
Q1
0.76
Min
0.25
Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) vs. AT&T (T): A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Telecommunication Services industry group benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) at 0.10 maintains Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) in the lower-leverage quartile of industry peers, ahead of AT&T (T) at 1.26, which sits around the industry mid-range.

CHT

Telecommunication Services industry group

0.10

Max
4.51
Q3
2.72
Median
1.26
Q1
0.69
Min
0.00

T

Telecommunication Services industry group

1.26

Max
4.51
Q3
2.72
Median
1.26
Q1
0.69
Min
0.00
Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) vs. AT&T (T): A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Telecommunication Services industry group benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) leads with Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) of 166.33, above its industry benchmark range, while AT&T (T) at 6.60 also ranks strongly in the top quartile.

CHT

Telecommunication Services industry group

166.33

Max
12.14
Q3
5.32
Median
2.64
Q1
0.21
Min
-7.18

T

Telecommunication Services industry group

6.60

Max
12.14
Q3
5.32
Median
2.64
Q1
0.21
Min
-7.18
Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) vs. AT&T (T): A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Telecommunication Services industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCHTT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.490.92
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.270.40
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.101.26
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)166.336.60

Growth

Revenue Growth

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) vs. AT&T (T): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth at a Glance

SymbolCHTT
Revenue Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)7.49%2.87%
Revenue Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)4.10%2.92%
3-Year Revenue CAGR2.90%1.34%
5-Year Revenue CAGR2.61%-2.56%

EPS Growth

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) vs. AT&T (T): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth at a Glance

SymbolCHTT
EPS Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)3.09%-9.55%
EPS Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)3.68%82.59%
3-Year EPS CAGR1.96%--
5-Year EPS CAGR2.96%--

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AT&T (T) at 4.69% reports Dividend Yield (TTM) in the top quartile of industry peers, ahead of Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) at 3.65%, which sits around the industry mid-range.

CHT

Telecommunication Services industry group

3.65%

Max
9.79%
Q3
4.45%
Median
2.36%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

T

Telecommunication Services industry group

4.69%

Max
9.79%
Q3
4.45%
Median
2.36%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) vs. AT&T (T): A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Telecommunication Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) reports an unusual Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) of 410.88% — outside the typical 0–100% range, indicating either negative earnings (negative ratio) or dividends above current-period earnings (above 100%), both signaling sustainability concerns. Meanwhile AT&T (T) reports 37.73%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CHT

Telecommunication Services industry group

410.88%

Max
146.27%
Q3
66.92%
Median
30.73%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

T

Telecommunication Services industry group

37.73%

Max
146.27%
Q3
66.92%
Median
30.73%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) vs. AT&T (T): A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Telecommunication Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCHTT
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.65%4.69%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)410.88%37.73%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AT&T (T) at 8.05 trades in the lower-multiple quartile for Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM), while Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) at 27.23 sits in the higher-multiple quartile — a clear gap in trailing earnings multiples.

CHT

Telecommunication Services industry group

27.23

Max
43.58
Q3
23.93
Median
15.04
Q1
8.65
Min
2.01

T

Telecommunication Services industry group

8.05

Max
43.58
Q3
23.93
Median
15.04
Q1
8.65
Min
2.01
Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) vs. AT&T (T): A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Telecommunication Services industry group benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AT&T (T) at 1.36 hovers around the typical industry Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM), while Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) at 4.42 sits above its industry benchmark range — an elevated trailing revenue multiple for CHT relative to peers.

CHT

Telecommunication Services industry group

4.42

Max
2.72
Q3
2.18
Median
1.26
Q1
0.83
Min
0.19

T

Telecommunication Services industry group

1.36

Max
2.72
Q3
2.18
Median
1.26
Q1
0.83
Min
0.19
Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) vs. AT&T (T): A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Telecommunication Services industry group benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

Both Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) at 2.63 and AT&T (T) at 1.84 post Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) near the typical industry midpoint — neither company stands out strongly from peers on book-value multiple.

CHT

Telecommunication Services industry group

2.63

Max
6.26
Q3
4.25
Median
2.15
Q1
0.90
Min
0.28

T

Telecommunication Services industry group

1.84

Max
6.26
Q3
4.25
Median
2.15
Q1
0.90
Min
0.28
Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) vs. AT&T (T): A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Telecommunication Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCHTT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)27.238.05
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.421.36
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.631.84
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)21.439.94