Seek Returns

CG vs. NMR: Carlyle vs. Nomura Stock Comparison

How do Carlyle (CG) and Nomura (NMR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Carlyle (CG) and Nomura (NMR) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though CG is classified under Asset Management & Custody Banks while NMR falls under Investment Banking & Brokerage.

Carlyle (CG) trades as ordinary local shares, while Nomura (NMR) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for Carlyle (CG) and Nomura (NMR)
Profile ItemCGNMR
NameThe Carlyle Group Inc.Nomura Holdings, Inc. Sponsored ADR
Country/RegionUnited StatesJapan
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS Industry GroupFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
GICS IndustryCapital MarketsCapital Markets
GICS Sub-IndustryAsset Management & Custody BanksInvestment Banking & Brokerage
Market Capitalization14.04 billion USD27.53 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqNYSE
Listing DateMay 3, 2012December 17, 2001
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CG
NMR
GSPC
Loading price history…
Carlyle (CG) vs. Nomura (NMR), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Carlyle (CG) and Nomura (NMR). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Carlyle (CG) and Nomura (NMR). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Carlyle (CG) and Nomura (NMR)
MetricCGNMR
Total Return (1Y)-17.79%35.42%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)15.29%37.86%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)-3.77%18.78%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CG
NMR
GSPC
Loading price history…
Carlyle (CG) vs. Nomura (NMR), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Carlyle (CG) and Nomura (NMR). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Carlyle (CG) and Nomura (NMR)
MetricCGNMR
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)37.89%29.52%
Beta (5Y)1.820.79
Max Drawdown (5Y)-56.75%-38.40%
Avg. Volume (3M)3.48M789.26K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
CG and NMR are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Carlyle (CG) and Nomura (NMR)
MetricCGNMR
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.581.06
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.811.55

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Carlyle (CG) at 5.23% and Nomura (NMR) at 11.51% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

CG

Financial Services industry group

5.23%

Max
44.78%
Q3
21.85%
Median
12.91%
CG
5.23%
Q1
4.48%
Min
-18.71%

NMR

Financial Services industry group

11.51%

Max
44.78%
Q3
21.85%
Median
12.91%
NMR
11.51%
Q1
4.48%
Min
-18.71%
Loading chart…
Carlyle (CG) vs. Nomura (NMR): A comparison of their ROE against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Carlyle (CG) at 12.81% and Nomura (NMR) at 17.12% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

CG

Financial Services industry group

12.81%

Max
62.84%
Q3
28.05%
Median
15.36%
CG
12.81%
Q1
4.82%
Min
-28.52%

NMR

Financial Services industry group

17.12%

Max
62.84%
Q3
28.05%
NMR
17.12%
Median
15.36%
Q1
4.82%
Min
-28.52%
Loading chart…
Carlyle (CG) vs. Nomura (NMR): A comparison of their net margin against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Carlyle (CG) reports a negative operating margin of -52.93%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Nomura (NMR) reports 24.36%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CG

Financial Services industry group

-52.93%

Max
107.33%
Q3
55.90%
Median
30.09%
Q1
14.60%
Min
-44.34%
CG
-52.93%

NMR

Financial Services industry group

24.36%

Max
107.33%
Q3
55.90%
Median
30.09%
NMR
24.36%
Q1
14.60%
Min
-44.34%
Loading chart…
Carlyle (CG) vs. Nomura (NMR): A comparison of their operating margin against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Carlyle (CG) and Nomura (NMR)
MetricCGNMR
ROE (TTM)5.23%11.51%
ROA (TTM)1.27%0.68%
Net Margin (TTM)12.81%17.12%
Operating Margin (TTM)-52.93%24.36%
Gross Margin (TTM)----

Growth

Revenue Growth

Nomura (NMR) at 10.80% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Carlyle (CG) at -5.56% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
Carlyle (CG) vs. Nomura (NMR): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Carlyle (CG) at -21.30% and Nomura (NMR) at 7.17% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Carlyle (CG) vs. Nomura (NMR): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Carlyle (CG) and Nomura (NMR)
MetricCGNMR
Revenue Growth (YoY)-5.56%10.80%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-1.43%17.17%
EPS Growth (YoY)-21.30%7.17%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-13.34%58.75%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Carlyle (CG) in Financial Services and Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Carlyle (CG) in Financial Services and Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Carlyle (CG) and Nomura (NMR)
MetricCGNMR
Current Ratio (MRQ)----
Debt / Equity (MRQ)----
Net Debt / EBITDA----

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Carlyle (CG) at 3.50% pays an industry-typical yield; Nomura (NMR) at 620.40% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.

CG

Financial Services industry group

3.50%

Max
9.77%
Q3
3.92%
CG
3.50%
Median
1.09%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NMR

Financial Services industry group

620.40%

NMR
620.40%
Max
9.77%
Q3
3.92%
Median
1.09%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Carlyle (CG) vs. Nomura (NMR): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Carlyle (CG) reports payout ratio above 100% at 147.37%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Nomura (NMR) reports 16.85%, ranking against industry peers normally.

CG

Financial Services industry group

147.37%

Max
241.07%
CG
147.37%
Q3
97.36%
Median
25.77%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NMR

Financial Services industry group

16.85%

Max
241.07%
Q3
97.36%
Median
25.77%
NMR
16.85%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Carlyle (CG) vs. Nomura (NMR): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Carlyle (CG) and Nomura (NMR)
MetricCGNMR
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.50%620.40%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)147.37%16.85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Nomura (NMR) at 10.83 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Carlyle (CG) at 40.93 sits in the richer quartile — CG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

CG

Financial Services industry group

40.93

Max
45.85
CG
40.93
Q3
24.64
Median
15.37
Q1
9.68
Min
0.16

NMR

Financial Services industry group

10.83

Max
45.85
Q3
24.64
Median
15.37
NMR
10.83
Q1
9.68
Min
0.16
Loading chart…
Carlyle (CG) vs. Nomura (NMR): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Nomura (NMR) at 0.01 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Carlyle (CG) at 5.06 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.

CG

Financial Services industry group

5.06

Max
9.23
CG
5.06
Q3
4.57
Median
2.72
Q1
1.28
Min
-0.55

NMR

Financial Services industry group

0.01

Max
9.23
Q3
4.57
Median
2.72
Q1
1.28
NMR
0.01
Min
-0.55
Loading chart…
Carlyle (CG) vs. Nomura (NMR): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both Carlyle (CG) at 2.81 and Nomura (NMR) at 1.15 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

CG

Financial Services industry group

2.81

Max
7.79
Q3
3.63
CG
2.81
Median
1.57
Q1
0.81
Min
-0.39

NMR

Financial Services industry group

1.15

Max
7.79
Q3
3.63
Median
1.57
NMR
1.15
Q1
0.81
Min
-0.39
Loading chart…
Carlyle (CG) vs. Nomura (NMR): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Carlyle (CG) and Nomura (NMR)
MetricCGNMR
P/E Ratio (TTM)40.9310.83
P/S Ratio (TTM)5.060.01
P/B Ratio (MRQ)2.811.15
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)----