CG vs. MS: Carlyle vs. Morgan Stanley Stock Comparison
How do Carlyle (CG) and Morgan Stanley (MS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Carlyle (CG) and Morgan Stanley (MS) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though CG is classified under Asset Management & Custody Banks while MS falls under Investment Banking & Brokerage.
| Profile Item | CG | MS |
|---|---|---|
| Name | The Carlyle Group Inc. | Morgan Stanley Common Stock |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| GICS Industry | Capital Markets | Capital Markets |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Asset Management & Custody Banks | Investment Banking & Brokerage |
| Market Capitalization | 14.04 billion USD | 283.60 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | May 3, 2012 | February 23, 1993 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CG | MS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -17.79% | 19.44% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 15.29% | 40.69% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | -3.77% | 17.38% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CG | MS |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 37.89% | 29.73% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.82 | 1.21 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -56.75% | -32.38% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 3.48M | 5.37M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CG | MS |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.58 | 0.51 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.81 | 0.73 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Carlyle (CG) at 5.23% and Morgan Stanley (MS) at 18.04% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
CG
Financial Services industry group
5.23%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- CG
- 5.23%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
MS
Financial Services industry group
18.04%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- MS
- 18.04%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Carlyle (CG) at 12.81% and Morgan Stanley (MS) at 25.63% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CG
Financial Services industry group
12.81%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- CG
- 12.81%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
MS
Financial Services industry group
25.63%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- MS
- 25.63%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Carlyle (CG) reports a negative operating margin of -52.93%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Morgan Stanley (MS) reports 39.00%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CG
Financial Services industry group
-52.93%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
- CG
- -52.93%
MS
Financial Services industry group
39.00%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- MS
- 39.00%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CG | MS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 5.23% | 18.04% |
| ROA (TTM) | 1.27% | 1.35% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 12.81% | 25.63% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -52.93% | 39.00% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Morgan Stanley (MS) at 14.48% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Carlyle (CG) at -5.56% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Carlyle (CG) at -21.30% and Morgan Stanley (MS) at 28.43% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CG | MS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -5.56% | 14.48% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -1.43% | 9.52% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -21.30% | 28.43% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -13.34% | 18.41% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Carlyle (CG) in Financial Services and Morgan Stanley (MS) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Carlyle (CG) in Financial Services and Morgan Stanley (MS) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CG | MS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Carlyle (CG) at 3.50% and Morgan Stanley (MS) at 2.40% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
CG
Financial Services industry group
3.50%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- CG
- 3.50%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MS
Financial Services industry group
2.40%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- MS
- 2.40%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Carlyle (CG) reports payout ratio above 100% at 147.37%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Morgan Stanley (MS) reports 32.91%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CG
Financial Services industry group
147.37%
- Max
- 241.07%
- CG
- 147.37%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MS
Financial Services industry group
32.91%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- MS
- 32.91%
- Median
- 25.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CG | MS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.50% | 2.40% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 147.37% | 32.91% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Morgan Stanley (MS) at 14.39 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Carlyle (CG) at 40.93 sits in the richer quartile — CG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
CG
Financial Services industry group
40.93
- Max
- 45.85
- CG
- 40.93
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
MS
Financial Services industry group
14.39
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- MS
- 14.39
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Morgan Stanley (MS) at 3.55 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Carlyle (CG) at 5.06 sits in the pricier quartile — CG costs more per dollar of sales.
CG
Financial Services industry group
5.06
- Max
- 9.23
- CG
- 5.06
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
MS
Financial Services industry group
3.55
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- MS
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Carlyle (CG) at 2.81 and Morgan Stanley (MS) at 2.65 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
CG
Financial Services industry group
2.81
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- CG
- 2.81
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
MS
Financial Services industry group
2.65
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- MS
- 2.65
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CG | MS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 40.93 | 14.39 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 5.06 | 3.55 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.81 | 2.65 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |