Seek Returns logo

CDW vs. UI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CDW and UI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCDWUI
Company NameCDW CorporationUbiquiti Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsCommunications Equipment
Market Capitalization20.87 billion USD40.07 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 27, 2013October 14, 2011
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CDW and UI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CDW vs. UI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCDWUI
5-Day Price Return-1.84%0.63%
13-Week Price Return-12.55%56.23%
26-Week Price Return-0.62%113.57%
52-Week Price Return-27.39%190.21%
Month-to-Date Return-0.01%0.27%
Year-to-Date Return-8.49%99.55%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.40M0.20M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.21M0.15M
3-Month Volatility26.25%74.53%
Beta1.061.35

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CDW

45.37%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
21.57%
Q3
13.27%
Median
8.55%
Q1
4.42%
Min
-4.21%

CDW’s Return on Equity of 45.37% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

UI

179.90%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.30%
Q3
20.90%
Median
9.10%
Q1
4.29%
Min
-13.50%

UI’s Return on Equity of 179.90% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CDW vs. UI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CDW

4.92%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
17.31%
Q3
10.85%
Median
7.26%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-3.00%

CDW’s Net Profit Margin of 4.92% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UI

27.66%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
12.56%
Median
5.62%
Q1
2.50%
Min
-3.09%

UI’s Net Profit Margin of 27.66% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CDW vs. UI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CDW

7.64%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
15.08%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-3.83%

CDW’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.64% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UI

32.50%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
25.23%
Q3
13.72%
Median
6.44%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-10.95%

UI’s Operating Profit Margin of 32.50% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

CDW vs. UI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCDWUI
Return on Equity (TTM)45.37%179.90%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.26%55.77%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.92%27.66%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.64%32.50%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)21.57%43.42%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CDW

1.35

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.85
Median
2.03
Q1
1.51
Min
0.62

CDW’s Current Ratio of 1.35 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UI

1.65

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.33
Q3
2.13
Median
1.55
Q1
1.15
Min
0.91

UI’s Current Ratio of 1.65 aligns with the median group of the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CDW vs. UI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CDW

2.28

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.30
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.28, CDW operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

UI

0.37

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.86
Median
0.53
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

UI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.37 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CDW vs. UI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CDW

7.69

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
79.05
Q3
36.62
Median
12.51
Q1
3.72
Min
-18.73

CDW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.69 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UI

27.30

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
34.19
Median
7.59
Q1
3.73
Min
-9.94

UI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 27.30 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CDW vs. UI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCDWUI
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.351.65
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.170.62
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.280.37
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.6927.30

Growth

Revenue Growth

CDW vs. UI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CDW vs. UI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CDW

1.58%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.36%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

CDW’s Dividend Yield of 1.58% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UI

0.36%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
8.13%
Q3
3.29%
Median
0.94%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UI’s Dividend Yield of 0.36% is consistent with its peers in the Communications Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CDW vs. UI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CDW

30.73%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
218.94%
Q3
90.25%
Median
38.81%
Q1
3.69%
Min
0.00%

CDW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 30.73% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UI

20.39%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
70.91%
Median
30.78%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 20.39% is within the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CDW vs. UI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCDWUI
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.58%0.36%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)30.73%20.39%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CDW

19.41

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
74.74
Q3
42.40
Median
26.55
Q1
20.05
Min
10.12

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, CDW’s P/E Ratio of 19.41 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

UI

56.27

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
103.74
Q3
61.65
Median
26.20
Q1
18.12
Min
4.19

UI’s P/E Ratio of 56.27 is within the middle range for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CDW vs. UI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CDW

0.96

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.79
Q3
3.58
Median
2.05
Q1
1.29
Min
0.20

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, CDW’s P/S Ratio of 0.96 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

UI

15.57

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.86
Q3
6.24
Median
2.44
Q1
1.02
Min
0.48

With a P/S Ratio of 15.57, UI trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Communications Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CDW vs. UI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CDW

9.53

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.92
Q3
3.80
Median
2.23
Q1
1.42
Min
0.44

At 9.53, CDW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UI

37.26

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.28
Q3
5.73
Median
3.32
Q1
2.02
Min
0.42

At 37.26, UI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Communications Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CDW vs. UI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCDWUI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)19.4156.27
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.9615.57
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)9.5337.26
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.5163.84