Seek Returns logo

AAPL vs. CDW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at AAPL and CDW, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolAAPLCDW
Company NameApple Inc.CDW Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryTechnology Hardware, Storage & PeripheralsElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
Market Capitalization3,994.44 billion USD18.62 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateDecember 12, 1980June 27, 2013
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of AAPL and CDW by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

AAPL vs. CDW: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolAAPLCDW
5-Day Price Return1.11%1.24%
13-Week Price Return17.63%-11.41%
26-Week Price Return27.93%-23.91%
52-Week Price Return21.01%-22.00%
Month-to-Date Return0.75%-8.97%
Year-to-Date Return8.78%-16.64%
10-Day Avg. Volume47.55M2.07M
3-Month Avg. Volume52.98M1.35M
3-Month Volatility22.37%32.22%
Beta1.091.08

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

AAPL

164.05%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
56.93%
Q3
29.31%
Median
7.95%
Q1
5.02%
Min
-7.45%

AAPL’s Return on Equity of 164.05% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CDW

43.43%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
25.62%
Q3
13.32%
Median
9.23%
Q1
4.70%
Min
-3.60%

CDW’s Return on Equity of 43.43% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

AAPL vs. CDW: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

AAPL

26.92%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
17.92%
Q3
8.33%
Median
4.15%
Q1
1.88%
Min
-3.36%

AAPL’s Net Profit Margin of 26.92% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CDW

4.76%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
18.22%
Q3
10.34%
Median
7.81%
Q1
3.28%
Min
-4.57%

CDW’s Net Profit Margin of 4.76% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

AAPL vs. CDW: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

AAPL

31.97%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
20.70%
Q3
10.85%
Median
6.05%
Q1
3.54%
Min
-4.90%

AAPL’s Operating Profit Margin of 31.97% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

CDW

7.39%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
26.64%
Q3
15.10%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.57%
Min
-7.07%

CDW’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.39% is around the midpoint for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

AAPL vs. CDW: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolAAPLCDW
Return on Equity (TTM)164.05%43.43%
Return on Assets (TTM)32.80%6.99%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)26.92%4.76%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)31.97%7.39%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)46.91%21.60%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

AAPL

0.89

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.90
Median
1.38
Q1
0.97
Min
0.11

AAPL’s Current Ratio of 0.89 falls into the lower quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CDW

1.39

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.52
Q3
3.20
Median
2.02
Q1
1.51
Min
0.33

CDW’s Current Ratio of 1.39 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

AAPL vs. CDW: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

AAPL

1.34

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.34
Q3
0.82
Median
0.42
Q1
0.16
Min
0.00

AAPL’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.34. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CDW

2.22

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.12
Q3
0.55
Median
0.33
Q1
0.10
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.22, CDW operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

AAPL vs. CDW: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

AAPL

622.51

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
143.63
Q3
62.44
Median
17.59
Q1
5.32
Min
-23.93

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 622.51, AAPL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CDW

7.69

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
114.40
Q3
51.32
Median
14.03
Q1
3.74
Min
-61.15

CDW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.69 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

AAPL vs. CDW: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolAAPLCDW
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.891.39
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.861.24
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.342.22
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)622.517.69

Growth

Revenue Growth

AAPL vs. CDW: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

AAPL vs. CDW: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

AAPL

0.39%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.93%
Q3
3.31%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.01%
Min
0.00%

AAPL’s Dividend Yield of 0.39% is consistent with its peers in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CDW

1.75%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.16%
Q3
2.39%
Median
1.18%
Q1
0.12%
Min
0.00%

CDW’s Dividend Yield of 1.75% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

AAPL vs. CDW: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

AAPL

13.77%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
136.56%
Q3
76.58%
Median
35.95%
Q1
0.01%
Min
0.00%

AAPL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 13.77% is within the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CDW

31.39%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
197.57%
Q3
87.33%
Median
36.23%
Q1
3.99%
Min
0.00%

CDW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.39% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

AAPL vs. CDW: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolAAPLCDW
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.39%1.75%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)13.77%31.39%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

AAPL

35.42

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.58
Q3
27.14
Median
21.23
Q1
15.28
Min
8.31

A P/E Ratio of 35.42 places AAPL in the upper quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CDW

17.97

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
71.05
Q3
42.87
Median
27.84
Q1
19.17
Min
7.73

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, CDW’s P/E Ratio of 17.97 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

AAPL vs. CDW: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

AAPL

9.53

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
6.35
Q3
3.45
Median
0.96
Q1
0.46
Min
0.04

With a P/S Ratio of 9.53, AAPL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CDW

0.85

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
7.81
Q3
4.01
Median
2.09
Q1
1.25
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, CDW’s P/S Ratio of 0.85 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

AAPL vs. CDW: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

AAPL

51.21

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.94
Q3
8.15
Median
1.85
Q1
0.94
Min
0.32

At 51.21, AAPL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CDW

8.22

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
7.49
Q3
4.09
Median
2.35
Q1
1.55
Min
0.44

At 8.22, CDW’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

AAPL vs. CDW: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolAAPLCDW
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)35.4217.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.530.85
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)51.218.22
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)40.1618.72