CDNS vs. SNOW: Cadence Design Systems vs. Snowflake Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) and Snowflake (SNOW) both fall under the Software & Services industry group, but CDNS is classified in Software while SNOW is classified in IT Services.

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) has more than two decades of public-market history since June 10, 1987, whereas Snowflake (SNOW) listed on September 16, 2020 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Snowflake (SNOW) reports a negative ROE of -48.06%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) reports 22.87%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Snowflake (SNOW) reports a negative net margin of -20.07%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) reports 22.52%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Snowflake (SNOW) reports a negative operating margin of -17.00%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) reports 28.93%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Snowflake (SNOW) at 29.16% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) at 14.12% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for SNOW.

Only one side can be read here: Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) reports EPS growth of 5.45%, ranked against its industry; Snowflake (SNOW) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) at 1.36 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Snowflake (SNOW) at 0.94 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for SNOW.

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) at 0.41 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Snowflake (SNOW) at 1.29 uses more debt funding than most peers.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Neither Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) nor Snowflake (SNOW) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Neither Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) nor Snowflake (SNOW) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) trades at 63.60 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Snowflake (SNOW) has no P/E ratio this period.

Both Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) at 14.31 and Snowflake (SNOW) at 17.91 command a richer price per dollar of sales than most peers, sitting in the upper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.

Both look rich against book: Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) at 12.77 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Snowflake (SNOW) at 45.23 prices even higher, above its industry range.

Valuation Metrics