CDNS vs. FIG: Cadence Design Systems vs. Figma Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) and Figma (FIG) are both classified in the Application Software sub-industry within the broader Software industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) carries decades of public-market history since June 10, 1987, while Figma (FIG) listed on July 31, 2025 — long-window comparisons have far more historical data on the CDNS side.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Figma (FIG) reports a negative ROE of -38.36%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) reports 22.87%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Figma (FIG) reports a negative net margin of -40.21%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) reports 22.52%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Figma (FIG) reports a negative operating margin of -30.45%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) reports 28.93%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Figma (FIG) at 40.96% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) at 14.12% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for FIG.

Only one side can be read here: Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) reports EPS growth of 5.45%, ranked against its industry; Figma (FIG) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Both Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) at 1.36 and Figma (FIG) at 2.45 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.

Figma (FIG) at 0.07 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) at 0.41 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Neither Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) nor Figma (FIG) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Neither Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) nor Figma (FIG) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) trades at 63.60 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Figma (FIG) has no P/E ratio this period.

Figma (FIG) at 7.20 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) at 14.31 sits in the pricier quartile — CDNS costs more per dollar of sales.

Figma (FIG) at 6.52 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) at 12.77 carries an above-peer premium to book — CDNS is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics