CCL vs. IHG: Carnival vs. InterContinental Hotels Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Carnival (CCL) and InterContinental Hotels (IHG) are both classified in the Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines sub-industry within the broader Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Carnival (CCL) trades as ordinary local shares, while InterContinental Hotels (IHG) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Carnival (CCL) carries a highly aggressive beta of 2.42, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas InterContinental Hotels (IHG) is closer to market-like at 1.09 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Carnival (CCL) is heavily traded at around 21.48M shares per day, whereas InterContinental Hotels (IHG) sees a more moderate 213.26K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Carnival (CCL) earns 24.00% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; InterContinental Hotels (IHG) has no ROE this period.

InterContinental Hotels (IHG) at 13.40% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Carnival (CCL) at 11.37%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Both Carnival (CCL) at 26.43% and InterContinental Hotels (IHG) at 25.12% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Carnival (CCL) at 6.39% and InterContinental Hotels (IHG) at 5.40% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Only one side can be read here: Carnival (CCL) reports EPS growth of 40.28%, ranked against its industry; InterContinental Hotels (IHG) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Both Carnival (CCL) at 0.27 and InterContinental Hotels (IHG) at 0.66 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Carnival (CCL) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 1.77 against its industry range, while InterContinental Hotels (IHG) reports no figure this period.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Carnival (CCL) at 1.53% and InterContinental Hotels (IHG) at 1.08% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

Carnival (CCL) at 19.82% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while InterContinental Hotels (IHG) at 39.21% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Carnival (CCL) at 13.03 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while InterContinental Hotels (IHG) at 37.95 sits in the richer quartile — IHG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

Carnival (CCL) at 1.44 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while InterContinental Hotels (IHG) at 4.89 sits in the pricier quartile — IHG costs more per dollar of sales.

InterContinental Hotels (IHG) reports a negative P/B ratio of -53.91, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile Carnival (CCL) reports 2.82, ranking against industry peers normally.

Valuation Metrics