CCK vs. PKX: Crown Holdings vs. POSCO Stock Comparison
How do Crown Holdings (CCK) and POSCO (PKX) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Crown Holdings (CCK) and POSCO (PKX) both fall under the Materials industry group, but CCK is classified in Containers & Packaging while PKX is classified in Metals & Mining.
Crown Holdings (CCK) trades as ordinary local shares, while POSCO (PKX) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | CCK | PKX |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Crown Holdings Inc. | POSCO Holdings Inc. American Depositary Receipt |
| Country/Region | United States | South Korea |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Containers & Packaging | Metals & Mining |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Metal, Glass & Plastic Containers | Steel |
| Market Capitalization | 13.11 billion USD | 14.79 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | October 14, 1994 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CCK | PKX |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 28.01% | -4.84% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 17.05% | -15.65% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 4.17% | -1.81% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
POSCO (PKX) has an aggressive beta of 1.71, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Crown Holdings (CCK) is defensive at 0.53 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | CCK | PKX |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 25.51% | 46.00% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.53 | 1.71 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -48.28% | -68.71% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 877.28K | 216.95K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CCK | PKX |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.93 | -0.20 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.46 | -0.30 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Crown Holdings (CCK) at 27.13% sits in the top ROE quartile, while POSCO (PKX) at 2.21% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CCK.
CCK
Materials industry group
27.13%
- Max
- 52.88%
- CCK
- 27.13%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
PKX
Materials industry group
2.21%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- PKX
- 2.21%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 5.78% and POSCO (PKX) at 1.89% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CCK
Materials industry group
5.78%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- CCK
- 5.78%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
PKX
Materials industry group
1.89%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- PKX
- 1.89%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 11.96% and POSCO (PKX) at 4.26% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CCK
Materials industry group
11.96%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- CCK
- 11.96%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
PKX
Materials industry group
4.26%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- PKX
- 4.26%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CCK | PKX |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 27.13% | 2.21% |
| ROA (TTM) | 7.05% | 1.31% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 5.78% | 1.89% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.96% | 4.26% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 20.18% | 7.87% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Crown Holdings (CCK) at 4.78% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while POSCO (PKX) at -6.09% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 79.72% and POSCO (PKX) at -29.00% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CCK | PKX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 4.78% | -6.09% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -1.51% | -6.72% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 79.72% | -29.00% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 2.12% | -39.42% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
POSCO (PKX) at 1.98 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Crown Holdings (CCK) at 1.14 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for CCK.
CCK
Materials industry group
1.14
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- CCK
- 1.14
- Min
- 0.16
PKX
Materials industry group
1.98
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- PKX
- 1.98
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
POSCO (PKX) at 0.50 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Crown Holdings (CCK) at 1.75 uses more debt funding than most peers.
CCK
Materials industry group
1.75
- Max
- 1.98
- CCK
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
PKX
Materials industry group
0.50
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- PKX
- 0.50
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CCK | PKX |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.14 | 1.98 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.75 | 0.50 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.57 | 2.81 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Crown Holdings (CCK) at 1.08% pays an industry-typical yield; POSCO (PKX) at 18,518.52% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.
CCK
Materials industry group
1.08%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- CCK
- 1.08%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PKX
Materials industry group
18,518.52%
- PKX
- 18,518.52%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Crown Holdings (CCK) at 18.27% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while POSCO (PKX) at 51.60% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
CCK
Materials industry group
18.27%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- CCK
- 18.27%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PKX
Materials industry group
51.60%
- Max
- 83.62%
- PKX
- 51.60%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CCK | PKX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.08% | 18,518.52% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 18.27% | 51.60% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 16.92 and POSCO (PKX) at 15.57 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CCK
Materials industry group
16.92
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- CCK
- 16.92
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
PKX
Materials industry group
15.57
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- PKX
- 15.57
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
POSCO (PKX) at 0.00 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Crown Holdings (CCK) at 0.95 prices around its industry’s middle — PKX costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
CCK
Materials industry group
0.95
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- CCK
- 0.95
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
PKX
Materials industry group
0.00
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- PKX
- 0.00
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
POSCO (PKX) at 1.36 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Crown Holdings (CCK) at 4.41 carries an above-peer premium to book — CCK is pricier on assets.
CCK
Materials industry group
4.41
- Max
- 6.59
- CCK
- 4.41
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
PKX
Materials industry group
1.36
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- PKX
- 1.36
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CCK | PKX |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 16.92 | 15.57 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.95 | 0.00 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 4.41 | 1.36 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 5.53% | -23,410.34% |