CCK vs. NTR: Crown Holdings vs. Nutrien Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Crown Holdings (CCK) and Nutrien (NTR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Crown Holdings (CCK) and Nutrien (NTR) both fall under the Materials industry group, but CCK is classified in Containers & Packaging while NTR is classified in Chemicals.

Company profile comparison for Crown Holdings (CCK) and Nutrien (NTR)
Profile Item	CCK	NTR
Name	Crown Holdings Inc.	Nutrien Ltd.
Country/Region	United States	Canada
GICS Sector	Materials	Materials
GICS Industry Group	Materials	Materials
GICS Industry	Containers & Packaging	Chemicals
GICS Sub-Industry	Metal, Glass & Plastic Containers	Fertilizers & Agricultural Chemicals
Market Capitalization	13.11 billion USD	33.89 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	January 2, 2018
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CCK

NTR

GSPC

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. Nutrien (NTR), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Crown Holdings (CCK) and Nutrien (NTR). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Crown Holdings (CCK) and Nutrien (NTR). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Crown Holdings (CCK) and Nutrien (NTR)
Metric	CCK	NTR
Total Return (1Y)	28.01%	30.80%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	17.05%	13.84%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	4.17%	4.29%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CCK

NTR

GSPC

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. Nutrien (NTR), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Crown Holdings (CCK) and Nutrien (NTR). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Crown Holdings (CCK) and Nutrien (NTR)
Metric	CCK	NTR
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	25.51%	32.77%
Beta (5Y)	0.53	0.64
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-48.28%	-58.17%
Avg. Volume (3M)	877.28K	2.56M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

CCK and NTR are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Crown Holdings (CCK) and Nutrien (NTR)
Metric	CCK	NTR
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	0.93	0.81
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	1.46	1.18

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Crown Holdings (CCK) at 27.13% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Nutrien (NTR) at 8.76% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CCK.

CCK

Materials industry group

27.13%

Max: 52.88%
CCK: 27.13%
Q3: 19.49%
Median: 8.76%
Q1: -3.41%
Min: -32.81%

NTR

Materials industry group

8.76%

Max: 52.88%
Q3: 19.49%
NTR: 8.76%
Median: 8.76%
Q1: -3.41%
Min: -32.81%

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. Nutrien (NTR): A comparison of their ROE against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 5.78% and Nutrien (NTR) at 8.04% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

CCK

Materials industry group

5.78%

Max: 38.66%
Q3: 15.98%
CCK: 5.78%
Median: 5.28%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -20.40%

NTR

Materials industry group

8.04%

Max: 38.66%
Q3: 15.98%
NTR: 8.04%
Median: 5.28%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -20.40%

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. Nutrien (NTR): A comparison of their net margin against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 11.96% and Nutrien (NTR) at 10.97% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

CCK

Materials industry group

11.96%

Max: 66.70%
Q3: 28.92%
Median: 12.56%
CCK: 11.96%
Q1: 3.28%
Min: -14.07%

NTR

Materials industry group

10.97%

Max: 66.70%
Q3: 28.92%
Median: 12.56%
NTR: 10.97%
Q1: 3.28%
Min: -14.07%

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. Nutrien (NTR): A comparison of their operating margin against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Crown Holdings (CCK) and Nutrien (NTR)
Metric	CCK	NTR
ROE (TTM)	27.13%	8.76%
ROA (TTM)	7.05%	4.24%
Net Margin (TTM)	5.78%	8.04%
Operating Margin (TTM)	11.96%	10.97%
Gross Margin (TTM)	20.18%	31.60%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 4.78% and Nutrien (NTR) at 3.52% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. Nutrien (NTR): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Nutrien (NTR) at 242.65% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Crown Holdings (CCK) at 79.72% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for NTR.

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. Nutrien (NTR): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Crown Holdings (CCK) and Nutrien (NTR)
Metric	CCK	NTR
Revenue Growth (YoY)	4.78%	3.52%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	-1.51%	-10.80%
EPS Growth (YoY)	79.72%	242.65%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	2.12%	-30.99%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 1.14 and Nutrien (NTR) at 1.41 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

CCK

Materials industry group

1.14

Max: 5.96
Q3: 3.30
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.45
CCK: 1.14
Min: 0.16

NTR

Materials industry group

1.41

Max: 5.96
Q3: 3.30
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.45
NTR: 1.41
Min: 0.16

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. Nutrien (NTR): A comparison of their current ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Nutrien (NTR) at 0.55 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Crown Holdings (CCK) at 1.75 uses more debt funding than most peers.

CCK

Materials industry group

1.75

Max: 1.98
CCK: 1.75
Q3: 0.89
Median: 0.47
Q1: 0.13
Min: 0.00

NTR

Materials industry group

0.55

Max: 1.98
Q3: 0.89
NTR: 0.55
Median: 0.47
Q1: 0.13
Min: 0.00

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. Nutrien (NTR): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Crown Holdings (CCK) and Nutrien (NTR)
Metric	CCK	NTR
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.14	1.41
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	1.75	0.55
Net Debt / EBITDA	2.57	2.38

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Nutrien (NTR) at 3.03% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Crown Holdings (CCK) at 1.08% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, NTR the richer one.

CCK

Materials industry group

1.08%

Max: 4.52%
Q3: 1.85%
CCK: 1.08%
Median: 0.38%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

NTR

Materials industry group

3.03%

Max: 4.52%
NTR: 3.03%
Q3: 1.85%
Median: 0.38%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. Nutrien (NTR): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Crown Holdings (CCK) at 18.27% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Nutrien (NTR) at 47.93% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

CCK

Materials industry group

18.27%

Max: 83.62%
Q3: 41.37%
CCK: 18.27%
Median: 9.54%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

NTR

Materials industry group

47.93%

Max: 83.62%
NTR: 47.93%
Q3: 41.37%
Median: 9.54%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. Nutrien (NTR): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Crown Holdings (CCK) and Nutrien (NTR)
Metric	CCK	NTR
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.08%	3.03%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	18.27%	47.93%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 16.92 and Nutrien (NTR) at 15.61 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

CCK

Materials industry group

16.92

Max: 59.00
Q3: 32.93
Median: 18.82
CCK: 16.92
Q1: 11.96
Min: 3.93

NTR

Materials industry group

15.61

Max: 59.00
Q3: 32.93
Median: 18.82
NTR: 15.61
Q1: 11.96
Min: 3.93

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. Nutrien (NTR): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 0.95 and Nutrien (NTR) at 1.24 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

CCK

Materials industry group

0.95

Max: 9.62
Q3: 4.34
Median: 1.87
CCK: 0.95
Q1: 0.73
Min: 0.00

NTR

Materials industry group

1.24

Max: 9.62
Q3: 4.34
Median: 1.87
NTR: 1.24
Q1: 0.73
Min: 0.00

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. Nutrien (NTR): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Nutrien (NTR) at 1.32 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Crown Holdings (CCK) at 4.41 carries an above-peer premium to book — CCK is pricier on assets.

CCK

Materials industry group

4.41

Max: 6.59
CCK: 4.41
Q3: 3.55
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.26
Min: -0.17

NTR

Materials industry group

1.32

Max: 6.59
Q3: 3.55
Median: 2.08
NTR: 1.32
Q1: 1.26
Min: -0.17

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. Nutrien (NTR): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Crown Holdings (CCK) and Nutrien (NTR)
Metric	CCK	NTR
P/E Ratio (TTM)	16.92	15.61
P/S Ratio (TTM)	0.95	1.24
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	4.41	1.32
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	5.53%	5.77%