CCK vs. MT: Crown Holdings vs. ArcelorMittal Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Crown Holdings (CCK) and ArcelorMittal (MT) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Crown Holdings (CCK) and ArcelorMittal (MT) both fall under the Materials industry group, but CCK is classified in Containers & Packaging while MT is classified in Metals & Mining.

Crown Holdings (CCK) trades as ordinary local shares, while ArcelorMittal (MT) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for Crown Holdings (CCK) and ArcelorMittal (MT)
Profile Item	CCK	MT
Name	Crown Holdings Inc.	ArcelorMittal NY Registry Shares
Country/Region	United States	Luxembourg
GICS Sector	Materials	Materials
GICS Industry Group	Materials	Materials
GICS Industry	Containers & Packaging	Metals & Mining
GICS Sub-Industry	Metal, Glass & Plastic Containers	Steel
Market Capitalization	13.11 billion USD	45.85 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	August 7, 1997
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CCK

GSPC

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. ArcelorMittal (MT), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Crown Holdings (CCK) and ArcelorMittal (MT). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Crown Holdings (CCK) and ArcelorMittal (MT). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Crown Holdings (CCK) and ArcelorMittal (MT)
Metric	CCK	MT
Total Return (1Y)	28.01%	65.49%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	17.05%	45.03%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	4.17%	16.55%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CCK

GSPC

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. ArcelorMittal (MT), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Crown Holdings (CCK) and ArcelorMittal (MT). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

ArcelorMittal (MT) has an aggressive beta of 1.49, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Crown Holdings (CCK) is defensive at 0.53 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk profile metrics for Crown Holdings (CCK) and ArcelorMittal (MT)
Metric	CCK	MT
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	25.51%	44.08%
Beta (5Y)	0.53	1.49
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-48.28%	-45.99%
Avg. Volume (3M)	877.28K	1.35M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

CCK and MT are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Crown Holdings (CCK) and ArcelorMittal (MT)
Metric	CCK	MT
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	0.93	1.39
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	1.46	2.23

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Crown Holdings (CCK) at 27.13% sits in the top ROE quartile, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.83% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CCK.

CCK

Materials industry group

27.13%

Max: 52.88%
CCK: 27.13%
Q3: 19.49%
Median: 8.76%
Q1: -3.41%
Min: -32.81%

MT

Materials industry group

1.83%

Max: 52.88%
Q3: 19.49%
Median: 8.76%
MT: 1.83%
Q1: -3.41%
Min: -32.81%

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. ArcelorMittal (MT): A comparison of their ROE against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 5.78% and ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.64% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

CCK

Materials industry group

5.78%

Max: 38.66%
Q3: 15.98%
CCK: 5.78%
Median: 5.28%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -20.40%

MT

Materials industry group

1.64%

Max: 38.66%
Q3: 15.98%
Median: 5.28%
MT: 1.64%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -20.40%

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. ArcelorMittal (MT): A comparison of their net margin against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 11.96% and ArcelorMittal (MT) at 6.16% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

CCK

Materials industry group

11.96%

Max: 66.70%
Q3: 28.92%
Median: 12.56%
CCK: 11.96%
Q1: 3.28%
Min: -14.07%

MT

Materials industry group

6.16%

Max: 66.70%
Q3: 28.92%
Median: 12.56%
MT: 6.16%
Q1: 3.28%
Min: -14.07%

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. ArcelorMittal (MT): A comparison of their operating margin against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Crown Holdings (CCK) and ArcelorMittal (MT)
Metric	CCK	MT
ROE (TTM)	27.13%	1.83%
ROA (TTM)	7.05%	1.31%
Net Margin (TTM)	5.78%	1.64%
Operating Margin (TTM)	11.96%	6.16%
Gross Margin (TTM)	20.18%	8.16%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Crown Holdings (CCK) at 4.78% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at -1.74% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. ArcelorMittal (MT): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

ArcelorMittal (MT) at 143.20% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Crown Holdings (CCK) at 79.72% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for MT.

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. ArcelorMittal (MT): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Crown Holdings (CCK) and ArcelorMittal (MT)
Metric	CCK	MT
Revenue Growth (YoY)	4.78%	-1.74%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	-1.51%	-8.41%
EPS Growth (YoY)	79.72%	143.20%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	2.12%	-26.09%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 1.14 and ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.41 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

CCK

Materials industry group

1.14

Max: 5.96
Q3: 3.30
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.45
CCK: 1.14
Min: 0.16

MT

Materials industry group

1.41

Max: 5.96
Q3: 3.30
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.45
MT: 1.41
Min: 0.16

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. ArcelorMittal (MT): A comparison of their current ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

ArcelorMittal (MT) at 0.24 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Crown Holdings (CCK) at 1.75 uses more debt funding than most peers.

CCK

Materials industry group

1.75

Max: 1.98
CCK: 1.75
Q3: 0.89
Median: 0.47
Q1: 0.13
Min: 0.00

MT

Materials industry group

0.24

Max: 1.98
Q3: 0.89
Median: 0.47
MT: 0.24
Q1: 0.13
Min: 0.00

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. ArcelorMittal (MT): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Crown Holdings (CCK) and ArcelorMittal (MT)
Metric	CCK	MT
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.14	1.41
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	1.75	0.24
Net Debt / EBITDA	2.57	2.08

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Crown Holdings (CCK) at 1.08% and ArcelorMittal (MT) at 0.99% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

CCK

Materials industry group

1.08%

Max: 4.52%
Q3: 1.85%
CCK: 1.08%
Median: 0.38%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MT

Materials industry group

0.99%

Max: 4.52%
Q3: 1.85%
MT: 0.99%
Median: 0.38%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. ArcelorMittal (MT): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Crown Holdings (CCK) at 18.27% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at 52.92% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

CCK

Materials industry group

18.27%

Max: 83.62%
Q3: 41.37%
CCK: 18.27%
Median: 9.54%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MT

Materials industry group

52.92%

Max: 83.62%
MT: 52.92%
Q3: 41.37%
Median: 9.54%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. ArcelorMittal (MT): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Crown Holdings (CCK) and ArcelorMittal (MT)
Metric	CCK	MT
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.08%	0.99%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	18.27%	52.92%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Crown Holdings (CCK) at 16.92 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at 44.51 sits in the richer quartile — MT needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

CCK

Materials industry group

16.92

Max: 59.00
Q3: 32.93
Median: 18.82
CCK: 16.92
Q1: 11.96
Min: 3.93

MT

Materials industry group

44.51

Max: 59.00
MT: 44.51
Q3: 32.93
Median: 18.82
Q1: 11.96
Min: 3.93

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. ArcelorMittal (MT): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

ArcelorMittal (MT) at 0.72 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Crown Holdings (CCK) at 0.95 prices around its industry’s middle — MT costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

CCK

Materials industry group

0.95

Max: 9.62
Q3: 4.34
Median: 1.87
CCK: 0.95
Q1: 0.73
Min: 0.00

MT

Materials industry group

0.72

Max: 9.62
Q3: 4.34
Median: 1.87
Q1: 0.73
MT: 0.72
Min: 0.00

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. ArcelorMittal (MT): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.70 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Crown Holdings (CCK) at 4.41 carries an above-peer premium to book — CCK is pricier on assets.

CCK

Materials industry group

4.41

Max: 6.59
CCK: 4.41
Q3: 3.55
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.26
Min: -0.17

MT

Materials industry group

1.70

Max: 6.59
Q3: 3.55
Median: 2.08
MT: 1.70
Q1: 1.26
Min: -0.17

Crown Holdings (CCK) vs. ArcelorMittal (MT): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Crown Holdings (CCK) and ArcelorMittal (MT)
Metric	CCK	MT
P/E Ratio (TTM)	16.92	44.51
P/S Ratio (TTM)	0.95	0.72
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	4.41	1.70
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	5.53%	-1.75%