Seek Returns

CCJ vs. FANG: Cameco vs. Diamondback Energy Stock Comparison

How do Cameco (CCJ) and Diamondback Energy (FANG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Cameco (CCJ) and Diamondback Energy (FANG) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though CCJ is classified under Coal & Consumable Fuels while FANG falls under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production.

Company profile comparison for Cameco (CCJ) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
Profile ItemCCJFANG
NameCameco CorporationDiamondback Energy Inc.
Country/RegionCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryCoal & Consumable FuelsOil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Capitalization31.05 billion USD49.96 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENasdaq
Listing DateMarch 14, 1996October 12, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CCJ
FANG
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Cameco (CCJ) and Diamondback Energy (FANG). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Cameco (CCJ) and Diamondback Energy (FANG). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricCCJFANG
Total Return (1Y)-18.97%26.99%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)21.14%8.52%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)22.20%14.17%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CCJ
FANG
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Cameco (CCJ) and Diamondback Energy (FANG). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricCCJFANG
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)51.10%33.77%
Beta (5Y)1.180.53
Max Drawdown (5Y)-49.04%-42.10%
Avg. Volume (3M)3.27M2.38M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
CCJ and FANG are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricCCJFANG
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.460.67
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.640.97

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 5.68% and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 4.86% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

CCJ

Energy industry group

5.68%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
CCJ
5.68%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

FANG

Energy industry group

4.86%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
FANG
4.86%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 11.43% and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 11.62% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

CCJ

Energy industry group

11.43%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
CCJ
11.43%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

FANG

Energy industry group

11.62%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
FANG
11.62%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 44.95% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Cameco (CCJ) at 9.23%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

CCJ

Energy industry group

9.23%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
CCJ
9.23%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

FANG

Energy industry group

44.95%

Max
71.31%
FANG
44.95%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricCCJFANG
ROE (TTM)5.68%4.86%
ROA (TTM)2.79%2.07%
Net Margin (TTM)11.43%11.62%
Operating Margin (TTM)9.23%44.95%
Gross Margin (TTM)33.83%73.62%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 35.44% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Cameco (CCJ) at 11.04% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for FANG.

Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Cameco (CCJ) at 246.15% delivers above-range EPS growth, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at -63.10% falls into the bottom quartile — a wide split in earnings momentum.

Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricCCJFANG
Revenue Growth (YoY)11.04%35.44%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)23.07%15.99%
EPS Growth (YoY)246.15%-63.10%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)83.08%-38.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Cameco (CCJ) at 2.55 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.55 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.

CCJ

Energy industry group

2.55

Max
3.64
CCJ
2.55
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

FANG

Energy industry group

0.55

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
FANG
0.55
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 0.14 and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.29 keep leverage in the lower quartile of their industries, with less balance-sheet debt relative to equity than most peers.

CCJ

Energy industry group

0.14

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
CCJ
0.14
Min
0.00

FANG

Energy industry group

0.29

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
FANG
0.29
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricCCJFANG
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.550.55
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.140.29
Net Debt / EBITDA0.190.99

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 0.35% and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.47% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

CCJ

Energy industry group

0.35%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
Median
1.71%
CCJ
0.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FANG

Energy industry group

2.47%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
FANG
2.47%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Cameco (CCJ) at 26.37% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 57.20% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

CCJ

Energy industry group

26.37%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
CCJ
26.37%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FANG

Energy industry group

57.20%

Max
133.24%
FANG
57.20%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricCCJFANG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.35%2.47%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)26.37%57.20%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both look expensive on trailing earnings: Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 24.09 sits in the richer P/E ratio quartile, and Cameco (CCJ) at 108.03 is richer still, above its industry range.

CCJ

Energy industry group

108.03

CCJ
108.03
Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

FANG

Energy industry group

24.09

Max
39.54
FANG
24.09
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.83 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Cameco (CCJ) at 8.93 clears its benchmark range — CCJ looks notably rich on sales.

CCJ

Energy industry group

8.93

CCJ
8.93
Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

FANG

Energy industry group

2.83

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
FANG
2.83
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 1.28 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Cameco (CCJ) at 6.03 prices above its benchmark range — CCJ looks rich relative to book.

CCJ

Energy industry group

6.03

CCJ
6.03
Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

FANG

Energy industry group

1.28

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
FANG
1.28
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricCCJFANG
P/E Ratio (TTM)108.0324.09
P/S Ratio (TTM)8.932.83
P/B Ratio (MRQ)6.031.28
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)0.63%12.09%