CBRS vs. STM: Cerebras Systems vs. STMicroelectronics Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Cerebras Systems (CBRS) and STMicroelectronics (STM) are both classified in the Semiconductors sub-industry within the broader Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

STMicroelectronics (STM) has been public since December 8, 1994, giving it decades of market history across multiple cycles, while Cerebras Systems (CBRS) listed only on May 14, 2026 and lacks comparable through-cycle data.

Cerebras Systems (CBRS) trades as ordinary local shares, while STMicroelectronics (STM) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Both CBRS and STM need 1-year volatility and 1-year return to plot risk-return positioning.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Capital efficiency shows on one side only: STMicroelectronics (STM) earns 2.95% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Cerebras Systems (CBRS) has no ROE this period.

Cerebras Systems (CBRS) reports a negative net margin of -75.27%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile STMicroelectronics (STM) reports 3.80%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Cerebras Systems (CBRS) reports a negative operating margin of -264.97%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile STMicroelectronics (STM) reports 11.10%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Cerebras Systems (CBRS) at 75.71% delivers above-range revenue growth, while STMicroelectronics (STM) at -11.07% falls into the bottom quartile — a wide split in revenue momentum.

Only one side can be read here: STMicroelectronics (STM) reports EPS growth of -89.16%, ranked against its industry; Cerebras Systems (CBRS) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

STMicroelectronics (STM) at 3.13 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Cerebras Systems (CBRS) at 5.83 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

Both Cerebras Systems (CBRS) at 0.16 and STMicroelectronics (STM) at 0.19 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Cerebras Systems (CBRS) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile STMicroelectronics (STM) reports a yield of 0.90%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Cerebras Systems (CBRS) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile STMicroelectronics (STM) reports a payout of 63.16%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: STMicroelectronics (STM) trades at 73.19 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Cerebras Systems (CBRS) has no P/E ratio this period.

STMicroelectronics (STM) at 2.73 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Cerebras Systems (CBRS) at 31.30 prices above its industry range — a wide gap in sales valuation between them.

Relative to net asset value, both Cerebras Systems (CBRS) at 2.23 and STMicroelectronics (STM) at 2.09 look inexpensive, sitting in the lower P/B ratio quartile of their industries.

Valuation Metrics