CBOE vs. TROW: Cboe Global Markets vs. T. Rowe Price Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) and T. Rowe Price (TROW) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though CBOE is classified under Financial Exchanges & Data while TROW falls under Asset Management & Custody Banks.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

T. Rowe Price (TROW) has an aggressive beta of 1.39, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) is defensive at 0.35 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 27.39% sits in the top ROE quartile, while T. Rowe Price (TROW) at 18.20% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CBOE.

T. Rowe Price (TROW) at 28.40% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 28.05%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 35.29% and T. Rowe Price (TROW) at 38.60% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 15.13% and T. Rowe Price (TROW) at 3.12% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 44.52% and T. Rowe Price (TROW) at 0.98% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) in Financial Services and T. Rowe Price (TROW) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) in Financial Services and T. Rowe Price (TROW) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

T. Rowe Price (TROW) at 4.76% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 0.86% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, TROW the richer one.

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 21.49% and T. Rowe Price (TROW) at 52.33% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

T. Rowe Price (TROW) at 10.97 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 25.14 sits in the richer quartile — CBOE needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

T. Rowe Price (TROW) at 3.00 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 6.98 sits in the pricier quartile — CBOE costs more per dollar of sales.

T. Rowe Price (TROW) at 2.03 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 6.22 carries an above-peer premium to book — CBOE is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics