CBOE vs. NMR: Cboe Global Markets vs. Nomura Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) and Nomura (NMR) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though CBOE is classified under Financial Exchanges & Data while NMR falls under Investment Banking & Brokerage.

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) trades as ordinary local shares, while Nomura (NMR) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 27.39% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Nomura (NMR) at 11.51% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CBOE.

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 28.05% and Nomura (NMR) at 17.12% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 35.29% and Nomura (NMR) at 24.36% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 15.13% and Nomura (NMR) at 10.80% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 44.52% and Nomura (NMR) at 7.17% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) in Financial Services and Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) in Financial Services and Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 0.86% pays an industry-typical yield; Nomura (NMR) at 620.40% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 21.49% and Nomura (NMR) at 16.85% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Nomura (NMR) at 10.83 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 25.14 sits in the richer quartile — CBOE needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

Nomura (NMR) at 0.01 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 6.98 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.

Nomura (NMR) at 1.15 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 6.22 carries an above-peer premium to book — CBOE is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics