CBOE vs. GPN: Cboe Global Markets vs. Global Payments Stock Comparison
How do Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) and Global Payments (GPN) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) and Global Payments (GPN) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but CBOE is classified in Capital Markets while GPN is classified in Financial Services.
| Profile Item | CBOE | GPN |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Cboe Global Markets Inc. | Global Payments Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| GICS Industry | Capital Markets | Financial Services |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Financial Exchanges & Data | Transaction & Payment Processing Services |
| Market Capitalization | 36.86 billion USD | 25.78 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Cboe | NYSE |
| Listing Date | June 15, 2010 | January 16, 2001 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CBOE | GPN |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 38.97% | 31.53% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 27.34% | -1.66% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 23.42% | -4.82% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CBOE | GPN |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 36.53% | 42.00% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.35 | 0.80 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -36.73% | -57.06% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.14M | 2.69M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CBOE | GPN |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.95 | 0.65 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.37 | 1.10 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 27.39% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Global Payments (GPN) at 0.84% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in returns on equity.
CBOE
Financial Services industry group
27.39%
- Max
- 44.78%
- CBOE
- 27.39%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
GPN
Financial Services industry group
0.84%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- GPN
- 0.84%
- Min
- -18.71%
Net Margin (TTM)
Global Payments (GPN) reports a negative net margin of -11.21%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) reports 28.05%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CBOE
Financial Services industry group
28.05%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- CBOE
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
GPN
Financial Services industry group
-11.21%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- GPN
- -11.21%
- Min
- -28.52%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 35.29% and Global Payments (GPN) at 15.73% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CBOE
Financial Services industry group
35.29%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- CBOE
- 35.29%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
GPN
Financial Services industry group
15.73%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- Median
- 30.09%
- GPN
- 15.73%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CBOE | GPN |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 27.39% | 0.84% |
| ROA (TTM) | 11.84% | 2.24% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 28.05% | -11.21% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 35.29% | 15.73% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 15.13% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Global Payments (GPN) at -0.39% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 44.52% and Global Payments (GPN) at -6.17% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CBOE | GPN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 15.13% | -0.39% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 6.00% | -4.96% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 44.52% | -6.17% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 68.19% | 143.57% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) in Financial Services and Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) in Financial Services and Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CBOE | GPN |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 0.86% and Global Payments (GPN) at 1.05% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
CBOE
Financial Services industry group
0.86%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- Median
- 1.09%
- CBOE
- 0.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
GPN
Financial Services industry group
1.05%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- Median
- 1.09%
- GPN
- 1.05%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Global Payments (GPN) reports payout ratio above 100% at 178.57%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) reports 21.49%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CBOE
Financial Services industry group
21.49%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- CBOE
- 21.49%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
GPN
Financial Services industry group
178.57%
- Max
- 241.07%
- GPN
- 178.57%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CBOE | GPN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.86% | 1.05% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 21.49% | 178.57% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both look expensive on trailing earnings: Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 25.14 sits in the richer P/E ratio quartile, and Global Payments (GPN) at 173.93 is richer still, above its industry range.
CBOE
Financial Services industry group
25.14
- Max
- 45.85
- CBOE
- 25.14
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
GPN
Financial Services industry group
173.93
- GPN
- 173.93
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Global Payments (GPN) at 2.24 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 6.98 sits in the pricier quartile — CBOE costs more per dollar of sales.
CBOE
Financial Services industry group
6.98
- Max
- 9.23
- CBOE
- 6.98
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
GPN
Financial Services industry group
2.24
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- GPN
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Global Payments (GPN) at 1.11 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 6.22 carries an above-peer premium to book — CBOE is pricier on assets.
CBOE
Financial Services industry group
6.22
- Max
- 7.79
- CBOE
- 6.22
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
GPN
Financial Services industry group
1.11
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 1.57
- GPN
- 1.11
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CBOE | GPN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 25.14 | 173.93 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 6.98 | 2.24 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 6.22 | 1.11 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |