CBOE vs. FIS: Cboe Global Markets vs. Fidelity Natl Information Svcs Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) and Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but CBOE is classified in Capital Markets while FIS is classified in Financial Services.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 27.39% and Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 23.04% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 28.05% and Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 26.77% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 35.29% and Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 22.93% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 15.13% and Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 5.43% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 44.52% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at -72.03% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) in Financial Services and Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) in Financial Services and Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 5.85% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 0.86% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, FIS the richer one.

Both Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 21.49% and Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 25.71% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 4.29 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 25.14 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 1.14 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 6.98 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.

Fidelity Natl Information Svcs (FIS) at 0.91 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Cboe Global Markets (CBOE) at 6.22 carries an above-peer premium to book — CBOE is pricier on assets.

Valuation Metrics