Seek Returns

BKR vs. FANG: Baker Hughes vs. Diamondback Energy Stock Comparison

How do Baker Hughes (BKR) and Diamondback Energy (FANG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Baker Hughes (BKR) and Diamondback Energy (FANG) both fall under the Energy industry group, but BKR is classified in Energy Equipment & Services while FANG is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels.

Company profile comparison for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
Profile ItemBKRFANG
NameBaker Hughes CompanyDiamondback Energy Inc.
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryEnergy Equipment & ServicesOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Capitalization47.54 billion USD49.96 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqNasdaq
Listing DateApril 6, 1987October 12, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

BKR
FANG
GSPC
Loading price history…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Diamondback Energy (FANG). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Diamondback Energy (FANG). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricBKRFANG
Total Return (1Y)3.17%26.99%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)15.12%8.52%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)16.57%14.17%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

BKR
FANG
GSPC
Loading price history…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Diamondback Energy (FANG). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricBKRFANG
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)35.34%33.77%
Beta (5Y)1.100.53
Max Drawdown (5Y)-46.53%-42.10%
Avg. Volume (3M)7.67M2.38M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
BKR and FANG are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricBKRFANG
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.030.67
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.040.97

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 15.06% and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 4.86% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

BKR

Energy industry group

15.06%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
BKR
15.06%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

FANG

Energy industry group

4.86%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
FANG
4.86%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 10.08% and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 11.62% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

BKR

Energy industry group

10.08%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
BKR
10.08%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

FANG

Energy industry group

11.62%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
FANG
11.62%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 44.95% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Baker Hughes (BKR) at 11.29%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

BKR

Energy industry group

11.29%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
BKR
11.29%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

FANG

Energy industry group

44.95%

Max
71.31%
FANG
44.95%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricBKRFANG
ROE (TTM)15.06%4.86%
ROA (TTM)4.46%2.07%
Net Margin (TTM)10.08%11.62%
Operating Margin (TTM)11.29%44.95%
Gross Margin (TTM)23.70%73.62%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 35.44% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Baker Hughes (BKR) at -0.35% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for FANG.

Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Baker Hughes (BKR) at -12.75% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at -63.10% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricBKRFANG
Revenue Growth (YoY)-0.35%35.44%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)9.44%15.99%
EPS Growth (YoY)-12.75%-63.10%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)---38.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.24 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.55 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for FANG.

BKR

Energy industry group

1.24

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
BKR
1.24
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

FANG

Energy industry group

0.55

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
FANG
0.55
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.29 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Baker Hughes (BKR) at 0.89 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

BKR

Energy industry group

0.89

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
BKR
0.89
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

FANG

Energy industry group

0.29

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
FANG
0.29
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricBKRFANG
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.240.55
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.890.29
Net Debt / EBITDA2.570.99

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.99% and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.47% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

BKR

Energy industry group

1.99%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
BKR
1.99%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FANG

Energy industry group

2.47%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
FANG
2.47%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Baker Hughes (BKR) at 31.62% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 57.20% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

BKR

Energy industry group

31.62%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
BKR
31.62%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FANG

Energy industry group

57.20%

Max
133.24%
FANG
57.20%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricBKRFANG
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.99%2.47%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)31.62%57.20%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Baker Hughes (BKR) at 16.45 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 24.09 sits in the richer quartile — FANG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

BKR

Energy industry group

16.45

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
BKR
16.45
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

FANG

Energy industry group

24.09

Max
39.54
FANG
24.09
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.65 and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.83 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

BKR

Energy industry group

1.65

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
BKR
1.65
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

FANG

Energy industry group

2.83

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
FANG
2.83
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 2.36 and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 1.28 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

BKR

Energy industry group

2.36

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
BKR
2.36
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

FANG

Energy industry group

1.28

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
FANG
1.28
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Baker Hughes (BKR) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Baker Hughes (BKR) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricBKRFANG
P/E Ratio (TTM)16.4524.09
P/S Ratio (TTM)1.652.83
P/B Ratio (MRQ)2.361.28
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)10.69%12.09%