Seek Returns logo

BIIB vs. MTD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BIIB and MTD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBIIBMTD
Company NameBiogen Inc.Mettler-Toledo International Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryBiotechnologyLife Sciences Tools & Services
Market Capitalization22.61 billion USD26.57 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateSeptember 17, 1991November 14, 1997
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BIIB and MTD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BIIB vs. MTD: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBIIBMTD
5-Day Price Return13.67%-1.18%
13-Week Price Return18.57%4.50%
26-Week Price Return9.90%3.07%
52-Week Price Return-20.44%-16.99%
Month-to-Date Return10.09%-5.64%
Year-to-Date Return0.85%0.32%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.88M0.15M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.50M0.15M
3-Month Volatility37.29%27.94%
Beta0.111.41

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BIIB

9.04%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
97.92%
Q3
11.99%
Median
-19.30%
Q1
-51.29%
Min
-132.03%

BIIB’s Return on Equity of 9.04% is on par with the norm for the Biotechnology industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MTD

1,675.84%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
19.96%
Q3
11.51%
Median
6.47%
Q1
3.86%
Min
-6.95%

MTD’s Return on Equity of 1,675.84% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

BIIB vs. MTD: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BIIB

15.31%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
73.34%
Q3
18.98%
Median
-12.96%
Q1
-105.72%
Min
-259.82%

BIIB’s Net Profit Margin of 15.31% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Biotechnology industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MTD

21.46%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
32.18%
Q3
18.30%
Median
10.19%
Q1
4.20%
Min
-2.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.46% places MTD in the upper quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BIIB vs. MTD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BIIB

20.80%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
78.85%
Q3
21.90%
Median
-13.30%
Q1
-109.94%
Min
-278.10%

BIIB’s Operating Profit Margin of 20.80% is around the midpoint for the Biotechnology industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MTD

26.49%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
38.39%
Q3
21.40%
Median
13.57%
Q1
8.38%
Min
-3.51%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.49% places MTD in the upper quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BIIB vs. MTD: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBIIBMTD
Return on Equity (TTM)9.04%1,675.84%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.43%25.15%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.31%21.46%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)20.80%26.49%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)75.43%59.94%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BIIB

2.50

Biotechnology Industry

Max
16.97
Q3
8.39
Median
4.11
Q1
2.64
Min
0.74

BIIB’s Current Ratio of 2.50 falls into the lower quartile for the Biotechnology industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MTD

1.12

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
3.46
Q3
2.78
Median
1.91
Q1
1.53
Min
0.43

MTD’s Current Ratio of 1.12 falls into the lower quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

BIIB vs. MTD: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Biotechnology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BIIB

0.36

Biotechnology Industry

Max
1.92
Q3
0.79
Median
0.12
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

BIIB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.36 is typical for the Biotechnology industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MTD

81.23

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.35
Q3
0.74
Median
0.41
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 81.23, MTD operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

BIIB vs. MTD: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Biotechnology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BIIB

4.35

Biotechnology Industry

Max
72.37
Q3
1.03
Median
-9.59
Q1
-65.05
Min
-163.11

BIIB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.35 is in the upper quartile for the Biotechnology industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MTD

15.60

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
45.00
Q3
27.84
Median
7.16
Q1
2.12
Min
-14.08

MTD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.60 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BIIB vs. MTD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBIIBMTD
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.501.12
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.790.67
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.3681.23
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.3515.60

Growth

Revenue Growth

BIIB vs. MTD: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BIIB vs. MTD: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BIIB

0.00%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BIIB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MTD

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.41%
Q3
0.65%
Median
0.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MTD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

BIIB vs. MTD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BIIB

0.00%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BIIB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MTD

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
113.14%
Q3
61.34%
Median
17.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MTD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

BIIB vs. MTD: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBIIBMTD
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BIIB

14.44

Biotechnology Industry

Max
40.44
Q3
39.37
Median
22.12
Q1
15.76
Min
3.48

In the lower quartile for the Biotechnology industry, BIIB’s P/E Ratio of 14.44 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MTD

31.62

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
75.35
Q3
51.00
Median
32.93
Q1
25.27
Min
1.43

MTD’s P/E Ratio of 31.62 is within the middle range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BIIB vs. MTD: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BIIB

2.21

Biotechnology Industry

Max
92.67
Q3
41.36
Median
8.45
Q1
4.46
Min
0.97

In the lower quartile for the Biotechnology industry, BIIB’s P/S Ratio of 2.21 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

MTD

6.78

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
10.49
Q3
6.43
Median
4.66
Q1
2.88
Min
1.08

MTD’s P/S Ratio of 6.78 is in the upper echelon for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BIIB vs. MTD: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BIIB

1.04

Biotechnology Industry

Max
22.72
Q3
10.68
Median
4.55
Q1
2.44
Min
0.59

BIIB’s P/B Ratio of 1.04 is in the lower quartile for the Biotechnology industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

MTD

1,299.40

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
6.69
Q3
5.00
Median
3.46
Q1
2.38
Min
0.93

At 1,299.40, MTD’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BIIB vs. MTD: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Biotechnology and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBIIBMTD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)14.4431.62
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.216.78
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.041,299.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.9730.94