Seek Returns logo

BIIB vs. LLY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BIIB and LLY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBIIBLLY
Company NameBiogen Inc.Eli Lilly and Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryBiotechnologyPharmaceuticals
Market Capitalization24.51 billion USD916.61 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateSeptember 17, 1991June 1, 1972
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BIIB and LLY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BIIB vs. LLY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBIIBLLY
5-Day Price Return7.23%6.07%
13-Week Price Return20.89%46.21%
26-Week Price Return36.04%37.43%
52-Week Price Return1.06%26.30%
Month-to-Date Return8.61%18.82%
Year-to-Date Return9.57%32.81%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.95M5.24M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.62M4.43M
3-Month Volatility33.63%32.04%
Beta0.100.32

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BIIB

9.26%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
96.19%
Q3
12.45%
Median
-16.39%
Q1
-47.43%
Min
-131.19%

BIIB’s Return on Equity of 9.26% is on par with the norm for the Biotechnology industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LLY

102.26%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.95%
Q3
20.34%
Median
11.59%
Q1
3.32%
Min
-10.91%

LLY’s Return on Equity of 102.26% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

BIIB vs. LLY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BIIB

15.99%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
84.13%
Q3
19.34%
Median
-1.39%
Q1
-117.64%
Min
-296.77%

BIIB’s Net Profit Margin of 15.99% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Biotechnology industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LLY

30.99%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
39.07%
Q3
19.28%
Median
13.48%
Q1
5.73%
Min
-8.86%

A Net Profit Margin of 30.99% places LLY in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BIIB vs. LLY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BIIB

21.91%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
78.85%
Q3
20.86%
Median
0.51%
Q1
-128.29%
Min
-315.84%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.91% places BIIB in the upper quartile for the Biotechnology industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LLY

38.84%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
45.58%
Q3
24.35%
Median
18.05%
Q1
7.58%
Min
-11.88%

An Operating Profit Margin of 38.84% places LLY in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BIIB vs. LLY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBIIBLLY
Return on Equity (TTM)9.26%102.26%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.67%19.18%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.99%30.99%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.91%38.84%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)75.24%83.03%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BIIB

2.72

Biotechnology Industry

Max
15.83
Q3
7.97
Median
4.06
Q1
2.64
Min
0.72

BIIB’s Current Ratio of 2.72 aligns with the median group of the Biotechnology industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LLY

1.55

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
5.45
Q3
2.99
Median
1.98
Q1
1.29
Min
0.78

LLY’s Current Ratio of 1.55 aligns with the median group of the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BIIB vs. LLY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BIIB

0.35

Biotechnology Industry

Max
1.27
Q3
0.62
Median
0.13
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

BIIB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.35 is typical for the Biotechnology industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LLY

1.79

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
1.79
Q3
0.78
Median
0.31
Q1
0.08
Min
0.00

LLY’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Pharmaceuticals industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.79. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

BIIB vs. LLY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BIIB

4.35

Biotechnology Industry

Max
72.37
Q3
1.71
Median
-15.18
Q1
-65.75
Min
-166.46

BIIB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.35 is in the upper quartile for the Biotechnology industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

LLY

20.36

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
43.60
Median
10.15
Q1
2.37
Min
-42.71

LLY’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BIIB vs. LLY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBIIBLLY
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.721.55
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.050.74
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.351.79
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.3520.36

Growth

Revenue Growth

BIIB vs. LLY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BIIB vs. LLY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BIIB

0.00%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BIIB currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LLY

0.54%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
6.72%
Q3
3.48%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LLY’s Dividend Yield of 0.54% is consistent with its peers in the Pharmaceuticals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BIIB vs. LLY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BIIB

0.00%

Biotechnology Industry

Max
0.00%
Q3
0.00%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BIIB has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LLY

28.28%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
199.58%
Q3
85.87%
Median
49.36%
Q1
1.12%
Min
0.00%

LLY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.28% is within the typical range for the Pharmaceuticals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BIIB vs. LLY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBIIBLLY
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.54%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%28.28%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BIIB

15.20

Biotechnology Industry

Max
115.91
Q3
56.76
Median
21.80
Q1
15.79
Min
4.51

In the lower quartile for the Biotechnology industry, BIIB’s P/E Ratio of 15.20 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

LLY

52.64

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
52.64
Q3
29.89
Median
20.77
Q1
13.37
Min
5.71

A P/E Ratio of 52.64 places LLY in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

BIIB vs. LLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BIIB

2.43

Biotechnology Industry

Max
58.56
Q3
29.31
Median
8.30
Q1
4.89
Min
0.86

In the lower quartile for the Biotechnology industry, BIIB’s P/S Ratio of 2.43 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

LLY

16.31

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
8.74
Q3
4.66
Median
2.37
Q1
1.67
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 16.31, LLY trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Pharmaceuticals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

BIIB vs. LLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BIIB

1.13

Biotechnology Industry

Max
17.92
Q3
10.38
Median
4.78
Q1
2.85
Min
0.78

BIIB’s P/B Ratio of 1.13 is in the lower quartile for the Biotechnology industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

LLY

30.35

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.86
Q3
5.28
Median
2.48
Q1
1.57
Min
0.59

At 30.35, LLY’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Pharmaceuticals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BIIB vs. LLY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBIIBLLY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.2052.64
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.4316.31
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.1330.35
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)10.81120.60