BEN vs. FUTU: Franklin Templeton vs. Futu Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Franklin Templeton (BEN) and Futu (FUTU) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though BEN is classified under Asset Management & Custody Banks while FUTU falls under Investment Banking & Brokerage.

Franklin Templeton (BEN) trades as ordinary local shares, while Futu (FUTU) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Franklin Templeton (BEN) has an aggressive beta of 1.52, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Futu (FUTU) is defensive at 0.68 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Futu (FUTU) at 30.52% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 10.51% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for FUTU.

Futu (FUTU) at 46.20% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 11.42%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Futu (FUTU) at 66.75% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 14.61%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Only one side can be read here: Futu (FUTU) reports revenue growth of 68.11%, ranked against its industry; Franklin Templeton (BEN) has no revenue growth figure this period.

Both Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 116.48% and Futu (FUTU) at 106.38% sit in the top peer quartile for EPS growth, so each is compounding per-share earnings faster than typical industry peers.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Franklin Templeton (BEN) in Financial Services and Futu (FUTU) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Franklin Templeton (BEN) in Financial Services and Futu (FUTU) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Futu (FUTU) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Franklin Templeton (BEN) reports a yield of 4.10%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Both Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 89.12% and Futu (FUTU) at 25.80% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Both Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 17.12 and Futu (FUTU) at 9.73 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

Futu (FUTU) at 0.57 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 1.84 prices around its industry’s middle — FUTU costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

On P/B ratio, both Franklin Templeton (BEN) at 1.46 and Futu (FUTU) at 2.75 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics