BE vs. PWR: Bloom Energy vs. Quanta Services Stock Comparison
How do Bloom Energy (BE) and Quanta Services (PWR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Bloom Energy (BE) and Quanta Services (PWR) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but BE is classified in Electrical Equipment while PWR is classified in Construction & Engineering.
| Profile Item | BE | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Bloom Energy Corp. Class A Common Stock | Quanta Services, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Electrical Equipment | Construction & Engineering |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Heavy Electrical Equipment | Construction & Engineering |
| Market Capitalization | 51.20 billion USD | 81.50 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | July 25, 2018 | February 12, 1998 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | BE | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 46.07% | 32.97% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 162.89% | 51.81% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 41.93% | 38.19% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Bloom Energy (BE) carries a highly aggressive beta of 3.61, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Quanta Services (PWR) is closer to market-like at 1.29 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.
| Metric | BE | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 112.64% | 50.22% |
| Beta (5Y) | 3.61 | 1.29 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -74.98% | -35.15% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 15.48M | 1.19M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | BE | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.37 | 0.57 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.57 | 0.87 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Bloom Energy (BE) at 39.61% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Quanta Services (PWR) at 18.02% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for BE.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
39.61%
- Max
- 40.55%
- BE
- 39.61%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
18.02%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- PWR
- 18.02%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Bloom Energy (BE) at 13.53% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Quanta Services (PWR) at 4.51%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
13.53%
- Max
- 27.47%
- BE
- 13.53%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
4.51%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- PWR
- 4.51%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Bloom Energy (BE) at 18.49% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Quanta Services (PWR) at 8.63%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
18.49%
- Max
- 36.60%
- BE
- 18.49%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
8.63%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- PWR
- 8.63%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | BE | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 39.61% | 18.02% |
| ROA (TTM) | 7.45% | 5.72% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 13.53% | 4.51% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 18.49% | 8.63% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 31.77% | 15.76% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Bloom Energy (BE) at 37.33% and Quanta Services (PWR) at 20.31% sit in the top peer quartile for revenue growth, so each is growing its top line faster than typical industry peers.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Quanta Services (PWR) reports EPS growth of 12.77%, ranked against its industry; Bloom Energy (BE) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | BE | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 37.33% | 20.31% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 19.06% | 18.60% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | 12.77% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 27.00% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Bloom Energy (BE) at 3.74 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Quanta Services (PWR) at 1.16 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
3.74
- Max
- 5.22
- BE
- 3.74
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
1.16
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- PWR
- 1.16
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Quanta Services (PWR) at 0.71 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Bloom Energy (BE) at 1.42 uses more debt funding than most peers.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
1.42
- Max
- 2.33
- BE
- 1.42
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
0.71
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- PWR
- 0.71
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | BE | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 3.74 | 1.16 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.42 | 0.71 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.50 | 1.43 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Bloom Energy (BE) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Quanta Services (PWR) reports a yield of 0.09%, ranking against industry peers normally.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- BE
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
0.09%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- PWR
- 0.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Bloom Energy (BE) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Quanta Services (PWR) reports a payout of 3.98%, ranking against industry peers normally.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- BE
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
3.98%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- PWR
- 3.98%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | BE | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.09% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 3.98% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both look expensive on trailing earnings: Quanta Services (PWR) at 48.95 sits in the richer P/E ratio quartile, and Bloom Energy (BE) at 104.99 is richer still, above its industry range.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
104.99
- BE
- 104.99
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
48.95
- Max
- 59.38
- PWR
- 48.95
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Quanta Services (PWR) at 2.19 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Bloom Energy (BE) at 13.37 clears its benchmark range — BE looks notably rich on sales.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
13.37
- BE
- 13.37
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
2.19
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- PWR
- 2.19
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both look rich against book: Quanta Services (PWR) at 7.73 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Bloom Energy (BE) at 26.49 prices even higher, above its industry range.
BE
Capital Goods industry group
26.49
- BE
- 26.49
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
PWR
Capital Goods industry group
7.73
- Max
- 9.66
- PWR
- 7.73
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BE | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 104.99 | 48.95 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 13.37 | 2.19 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 26.49 | 7.73 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -0.00% | 3.78% |